| Literature DB >> 35909115 |
Melkalem Mamuye Azanaw1, Dawit Tefera Fentie2, Yeaynmarnesh Asmare Bukayaw3, Ayenew Molla Lakew4, Malede Mequanent Sisay4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unmet need for family planning has been remaining high in developing countries than developed countries, notably in sub-Saharan Africa. Data on unmet needs can help countries set service priorities. This study aimed to explore the geographical disparities of unmet need among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia using a 2016 national population-based survey.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; Multi-level logistic analysis; Spatial Analysis; Unmet need; Women
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909115 PMCID: PMC9341114 DOI: 10.1186/s40834-022-00178-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contracept Reprod Med ISSN: 2055-7426
Socio-demographic characteristics of reproductive age women in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016(n = 15,683)
| Variables | Weighted frequency | Weighted percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age of the respondents | ||
| Mean ± SD of the women | 28.2 ± 9.2 | |
| 15–19 years | 3381 | 21.6 |
| 20–24 years | 2762 | 17.6 |
| 25–49 years | 9540 | 60.8 |
| Place of Residence | ||
| Urban | 3476 | 22.2 |
| Rural | 12,207 | 77.8 |
| Region | ||
| Tigray | 1129 | 7.2 |
| Afar | 128 | 0.8 |
| Amhara | 3714 | 23.7 |
| Oromia | 5701 | 36.4 |
| Somali | 460 | 2.9 |
| Benishangul Gumuz | 160 | 1.0 |
| SNNP | 3288 | 21.0 |
| Gambela | 44 | 0.3 |
| Harari | 39 | 0.3 |
| Addis Ababa | 930 | 5.8 |
| Dire Dawa | 90 | 0.6 |
| Religion | ||
| Orthodox Christian | 6786 | 43.3 |
| Muslim | 4893 | 31.2 |
| Protestant | 3674 | 23.4 |
| Catholic/tradition/others | 330 | 2.1 |
| Educational status of women | ||
| No education | 7498 | 47.8 |
| Primary education | 5490 | 35.0 |
| Secondary education | 1818 | 11.6 |
| Higher Education | 877 | 5.6 |
| Marital status | ||
| Never in union | 4036 | 25.7 |
| Married or in union | 10,223 | 65.2 |
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 1423 | 9.1 |
| Wealth status | ||
| Rich | 7263 | 46.3 |
| Average | 2978 | 19.0 |
| Poor | 5442 | 34.7 |
| Total living children | ||
| Less than five | 11,890 | 75.8 |
| Five or more | 3793 | 24.2 |
| Age at first marriage | ||
| < 15 years | 3055 | 19.5 |
| 15–24 years | 8029 | 51.2 |
| > 24 years | 4599 | 29.3 |
Variables related to women's knowledge of contraceptive methods andsource of information on family planning of women of reproductive age in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016(n = 15,683)
| Variables | Weighted frequency | Weighted percent |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of any methods | ||
| No | 264 | 1.7 |
| Yes | 15,419 | 98.3 |
| Visited by family planning workers within 12 months | ||
| No | 11,793 | 75.2 |
| Yes | 3890 | 24.8 |
| Did the fieldworker talk about family planning | ||
| No | 1732 | 44.5 |
| Yes | 2158 | 55.5 |
| Visited health facility within 12 months | ||
| No | 9157 | 58.4 |
| Yes | 6526 | 41.6 |
| AT health facility, told about family planning | ||
| No | 4176 | 64.0 |
| Yes | 2350 | 36.0 |
| Media exposure (Radio, TV, magazine/news) | ||
| No | 10,825 | 69.0 |
| Yes | 4858 | 31.0 |
Fig. 1Percentage of reproductive-age women with unmet need for family planning by region, in Ethiopia, 2016
Multivariable multilevel logistic regression analysis result of both individual and community-level factors associated with unmet need for family planning in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016
| Individual and community | Null model | Model II | Model III | Model IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 1 | 1 | ||
| Rural | 1.96 (1.41, 2.72) | 1.37*(1.01,1.93) | ||
| Region | ||||
| Tigray | 1 | 1 | ||
| Amhara | 0.87 (0.66, 1.16) | 0.89 (0.66,1.20) | ||
| Afar | 1.03 (0.74,1.42) | 0.69 (0.45,1.05) | ||
| Oromia | 1.79 (1.38,2.31) | 1.53*(1.10,2.11) | ||
| Somali | 0.55 (0.37,0.82) | 0.37***(0.22,0.61) | ||
| Benishangul Gumuz | 1.32 (1.01,1.73) | 0.99 (0.73,1.37) | ||
| SNNPR | 1.23 (0.93,1.61) | 1.02 (0.74,1.40) | ||
| Gambella | 1.90 (1.28,2.81) | 1.94**(1.26,3.01) | ||
| Harari | 1.69 (1.26,2.26) | 1.26 (0.86,1.84) | ||
| Addis Ababa | 0.87 (0.59,1.29) | 1.19 (0.80,1.77) | ||
| Dire-Dawa | 1.56 (1.07,2.28) | 1.25 (0.80,1.96) | ||
| Age of respondents | ||||
| 15–19 years | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20–24 years | 0.90 (1.10,1.74) | 0.89 (0.62,1.28) | ||
| 25–49 years | 0.97 (0.69,1.35) | 0.97 (0.69,1.36) | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| Never in union | 1 | 1 | ||
| Married or in unions | 26.72 (11.55,61.83) | 25.70***(11.50, 60.42) | ||
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 1.51 (0.46,4.95) | 1.55 (0.47,5.09) | ||
| Religion | ||||
| Orthodox | 1 | 1 | ||
| Muslim | 1.38 (1.11,1.74) | 1.35*(1.03,1.76) | ||
| Protestant | 0.87 (0.67,1.13) | 0.73*(0.54,0.99) | ||
| Catholic/traditions/others | 2.08 (1.22, 3.54) | 1.67 (0.96,2.91) | ||
| Wealth status | ||||
| Rich | 1 | 1 | ||
| Average | 1.22 (0.96,1.55) | 1.15 (0.90,1.48) | ||
| Poor | 1.46 (1.18,1.81) | 1.43**(1.14,1.79) | ||
| Women’s education | ||||
| No education | 1 | 1 | ||
| Primary education | 1.17 (0.96,1.42) | 1.16 (0.95, 1.42) | ||
| Secondary education | 1.14 (0.76,1.70) | 1.23 (0.82,1.86) | ||
| Higher education | 1.20 (0.75,1.93) | 1.37 (0.71,1.74) | ||
| Living children with the current pregnancy | ||||
| Less than five | 1 | 1 | ||
| Five and above | 2.00 (1.65,2.43) | 1.98***(1.62,2.41) | ||
| Age at first marriage | ||||
| Below 15 years | 1 | 1 | ||
| 15–24 years | 0.89 (0.74,1.07) | 0.89 (0.74,1.07) | ||
| 25 and above years | 0.76 (0.46,1.24) | 0.76 (0.46,1.24) | ||
| Knowledge of any FP methods | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 2.28 (1.26,4.14) | 1.56 (0.84,2.87) | ||
| Media exposure | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.94 (0.76,1.16) | 0.95 (0.77,1.17) | ||
| Visited by family planning workers within 12 months | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.98 (0.84,1.15) | 0.96 (0.83,1.14) | ||
| Visited health facility within 12 months | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.92 (0.76,1.01) | 0.92 (0.77,1.11) | ||
| Community-level education | ||||
| Low | 1 | 1 | ||
| High | 0.85 (0.69,1.04) | 0.90 (0.72,1.14) | ||
| Community-level media exposure | ||||
| Low | 1 | 1 | ||
| High | 0.69 (0.55,0.85) | 0.98 (0.79,1.21) | ||
| Random effects | ||||
| ICC | 35.8 | 24.9 | 23.3 | 20.3 |
| Log-likelihood (LL) | -6021.24 | -5160.85 | -5938.67 | -5126.52 |
| Deviance(-2LL) | 12,042.48 | 10,321.70 | 11,877.34 | 10,253.04 |
| PCV-Explained variation | Ref | 40.5 | 46.6 | 54.3 |
| MOR | 2.07 | 1.75 | 1.69 | 1.62 |
Key: COR Crude odds ratio AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; CI Confidence interval, ICC; 1: reference group; p-value 0.05–0.01 *: P-value < 0.01 **: p-value < 0.001***
Fig. 2Spatial distribution of unmet need family planning among reproductive age group women in Ethiopia, 2016
Fig. 3Hot spot analysis of unmet need family planning among reproductive age group women in Ethiopia, 2016
Fig. 4Interpolation of unmet need family planning among reproductive age group women in Ethiopia, 2016
SaT Scan analysis of the unmet need for family planning among reproductive age group women within the last five years in Ethiopia, 2016
| Cluster | Coordinate/radius | No_ of Clusters | population | cases | Expected cases | RR | LLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | (6.441558 N, 42.095158 E) / 348.82 km | 122 | 2361 | 541 | 327 | 1.88 | 85.16 | < 0.001 |
| Secondary | (7.896075 N, 38.358570 E) / 77.01 km | 19 | 941 | 226 | 130 | 1.82 | 37.24 | < 0.001 |
| Tertiary | (7.858150 N, 36.733551 E) / 78.67 km | 8 | 603 | 135 | 84 | 1.66 | 16.71 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 5SaTScan analysis of the unmet need for family planning among all women in the last five years in Ethiopia, 2016