Anthony Vipin Das1,2, Joveeta Joseph3,4. 1. Department of eyeSmart EMR & AEye, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Indian Health Outcomes, Public Health and Economics Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 3. Jhaveri Microbiology Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. joveeta@lvpei.org. 4. The Ramoji Foundation for Ocular Infections, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. joveeta@lvpei.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the epidemiology and landscape of ocular infections in patients undergoing microbiological investigations across a multi-tier ophthalmology network in India. METHODS: This cross-sectional hospital-based study included 15,822 patients in whom microbiology samples were analysed between September 2013 and December 2021. Ocular tissue of patients in whom a microbiology sample was processed in at least one eye were included. The data were collected using an indigenously developed electronic medical record system. RESULTS: Among the 15,822 patients, bacteria (51.06%) was the most common aetiology followed by fungus (38.27%). The majority of the patients were male (68.10%) and adults (90.01%). The most common age group was during the sixth decade of life with 2,914 (18.42%) patients. The patients were more commonly from the lower socio-economic status (51.61%) and from the rural geography (46.82%). Majority of the specimens sent for microbiological analysis were corneal scrapings (68.61%) followed by vitreous (8.77%). The most common bacteria isolated was Staphylococcus aureus (14.45%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.53%) and among the fungus were Fusarium (30.53%) and Aspergillus species (29.86%). Acanthamoeba (1.26%) and Microsporidia (0.38%) accounted for a minority of the infections in the samples. Fungus (53.10%; p ≤ 0.00001) and virus (51.08%; p = 0.000673) aetiology was found to be significantly higher in patients presenting from the rural geography. CONCLUSION: The most common aetiology of infection in ocular disease is bacterial but fungal infections also accounted for a significant proportion. The majority of the patients with ocular infections presented from the rural geography and from lower socio-economic status.
OBJECTIVE: To study the epidemiology and landscape of ocular infections in patients undergoing microbiological investigations across a multi-tier ophthalmology network in India. METHODS: This cross-sectional hospital-based study included 15,822 patients in whom microbiology samples were analysed between September 2013 and December 2021. Ocular tissue of patients in whom a microbiology sample was processed in at least one eye were included. The data were collected using an indigenously developed electronic medical record system. RESULTS: Among the 15,822 patients, bacteria (51.06%) was the most common aetiology followed by fungus (38.27%). The majority of the patients were male (68.10%) and adults (90.01%). The most common age group was during the sixth decade of life with 2,914 (18.42%) patients. The patients were more commonly from the lower socio-economic status (51.61%) and from the rural geography (46.82%). Majority of the specimens sent for microbiological analysis were corneal scrapings (68.61%) followed by vitreous (8.77%). The most common bacteria isolated was Staphylococcus aureus (14.45%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.53%) and among the fungus were Fusarium (30.53%) and Aspergillus species (29.86%). Acanthamoeba (1.26%) and Microsporidia (0.38%) accounted for a minority of the infections in the samples. Fungus (53.10%; p ≤ 0.00001) and virus (51.08%; p = 0.000673) aetiology was found to be significantly higher in patients presenting from the rural geography. CONCLUSION: The most common aetiology of infection in ocular disease is bacterial but fungal infections also accounted for a significant proportion. The majority of the patients with ocular infections presented from the rural geography and from lower socio-economic status.