Literature DB >> 35907851

Burden of phenylketonuria in Latin American patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

A L S Pessoa1,2, A M Martins3, E M Ribeiro1,4, N Specola5, A Chiesa6, D Vilela7, E Jurecki8, D Mesojedovas7, I V D Schwartz9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an inborn error of metabolism caused by a deficiency of the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase. If untreated, the complications of PKU lead to significant neucognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments, placing a burden on both the individual's quality of life and on the healthcare system. We conducted a systematic literature review to characterize the impact of PKU on affected individuals and on healthcare resources in Latin American (LATAM) countries.
METHODS: Searches of the global medical literature as well as regional and local medical literature up to September 2021. Observational studies on patients with PKU from any LATAM country. Pairs of reviewers independently screened eligible articles, extracted data from included studies, and assessed their risk of bias.
RESULTS: 79 unique studies (47 cross-sectional studies, 18 case series, 12 case reports, and two cohort studies) with a total of 4090 patients were eligible. Of these studies, 20 had data available evaluating early-diagnosed PKU patients for meta-analysis of burden outcomes. Intellectual disability in the pooled studies was 18% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.04-0.38; I2 = 83.7%, p = 0.0133; two studies; n = 114]. Motor delay was 15% [95% CI 0.04-0.30; I2 = 74.5%, p = 0.0083; four studies; n = 132]. Speech deficit was 35% [95% CI 0.08-0.68; I2 = 93.9%, p < 0.0001; five studies; n = 162].
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently evidence of high clinical burden in PKU patients in LATAM countries. Recognition that there are many unmet neuropsychological needs and socioeconomic challenges faced in the LATAM countries is the first step in planning cost-effective interventions.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; LATAM; Neurological disease; Overweight; Phenylketonuria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35907851      PMCID: PMC9338521          DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02450-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis        ISSN: 1750-1172            Impact factor:   4.303


Background

Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an inborn error of metabolism caused by a deficiency of the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) which results in elevated levels of phenylalanine (Phe) and reduced levels of tyrosine [1]. The incidence within Latin American (LATAM) countries is estimated at 1 in 23,000 live births [2]. PKU presents a spectrum of severity, and there are several different classifications that have been proposed [2]. Several different classification schemes to determine clinical management have been proposed since PAH deficiency presents a spectrum of severity [1]. Individuals with classical PKU have a complete enzyme deficiency resulting in untreated blood Phe levels > 1200 μmol/L (an average normal Phe level is approximately 60 μmol/L), which is considered the severe form of this disorder [1]. The treatment for PKU is a lifelong dietary restriction of protein supplemented by a Phe-free amino acid fortified medical food [1], and ongoing monitoring of blood Phe levels to maintain a target range of 120–600 μmol/L for patients ≥ 12 years old, and up to 360 μmol/L for those < 12 years old [3]. If left untreated, the disease can manifest as significant intellectual impairment, neuropsychiatric disorders, and seizures [4] which place a burden on the individual’s quality of life, their families, and on the public and private healthcare systems [4]. Even patients diagnosed and treated at an early age face significant challenges related to adherence with the Phe-restricted diet. Latin America comprises of 20 countries that represent a great diversity not only in terms of geography but also demographics, economies, languages, ethnicities, and health care systems [5]. In a recent review from Borrajo [6], newborn screening (NBS) programs were distinctively implemented in Latin America. While some programs date back from the 1980’s, other countries are still implementing regional NBS programs. Additionally, the number of diseases covered varies significantly across programs. Spefically concerning PKU, this genetic disorder is included in the NBS program for 14 countries (Cuba, Costa Rica, Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil, Guatemala, Paraguay, Panama, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Honduras) [6] with on average 92.3% of newborns in those countries screened for PKU. Regarding the availability of PKU treatment, half of the Latin America countries have fully subsidized medical foods by the government though the special low-protein foods are not available in most of the countries [7]. Evaluating the unmet needs and burden of PKU on affected individuals is important to determine the impact on the LATAM public and private healthcare system. Recognition that there are many challenges that the patient with PKU faces is the first step in planning for cost-effective intervention scenarios. We therefore conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to better characterize the impact of PKU in LATAM countries on selected patient-important outcomes as well as at the economic (socioeconomic, healthcare utilization) level.

Material and methods

Our review followed recommendations for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) [8]. This systematic review has been registered in the PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) database under the number CRD42020211417.

Eligibility criteria

We included any epidemiological observational study (ie, cohort, case-control, nested case-control, cross-sectional studies, case series, case reports, surveys) on patients with PKU or phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency (PAH), regardless of disease severity, including classical, moderate, and mild forms of this disorder, from any LATAM country regardless of whether they reported on any of the pre-defined patient-important outcomes and/or economic burden outcomes as defined below. We also included studies on caregivers of PKU patients. Studies that only reported disease prevalence or incidence as well as non-human studies and subjective reports of clinical or observational studies such as letters, editorials and commentaries were excluded. Pre-defined patient-important outcomes of interest included: Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments: intellectual disability, mental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, motor deficits, speech deficits and language delay, tremor, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and hyperactivity, mood, depression, anxiety, phobias, irritability and/or aggressiveness, frustration, social isolation; Executive function deficit: working memory, sustained attention, inhibitory control, processing speed impairments, impairment in visuomotor coordination; Other comorbidities such as overweight, osteopenia, osteoporosis, skin problems, headaches, fatigue and sleeping disorder; Quality of life measured by non-validated and validated questionnaires, as defined by the included studies; and Patient adherence to clinical recommendations, including frequency of blood testing (ideally biweekly to monthly with targeted Phe concentrations of 120–360 μmol/L as recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [1] and 120–600 μmol/L for those ≥ 12 years of age by the European guidelines [9] and dietary management including a Phe-restricted diet supplemented by Phe-free amino acid fortified medical foods as well as the use of sapropterin dihydrochloride in patients who are responsive to this pharmacological treatment. Symptoms of being late-treated for the disease, such as seizures, microcephaly, generalized rash, and peculiar-smelling urine, were not investigated as patient-important outcomes for the purposes of this review. Pre-defined economic outcomes of interest included: Socioeconomic impact (eg, school / education level, work experience and productivity, marital status, personal independence, living situation, employment, social status); Impact of PKU on caregiver health-related quality of life; and Impact of PKU on the healthcare system (eg, direct and/or indirect costs, treatment costs, health care resource use, cost of comedications, hospitalizations).

Data source and searches

Using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) based on the terms “phenylketonuria” and “phenylalanine” (Additional file 1: Table 1) we performed the search in the global medical literature using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE, via PubMed, from 1946 to September 2021), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE, via Elsevier, from 1974 to September 2021), and Web of Science (to September 2021). In the regional and local medical literature, both Spanish and English terms were used to search in Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS, 1982 to September 2021), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO, 1997 to September 2021), SciVerse Scopus via Elsevier (to September 2021), the Spanish Bibliographic Index of the Health Sciences (IBECS, 1983 to September 2021), National Bibliography in Health Sciences Argentina (BINACIS, to September 2021), Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (MedCarib, to September 2021), National Medical Sciences Information Center of Cuba (CUMED, to September 2021), Brazilian Bibliography of Dentistry (BBO, to September 2021), Health Information Locator (LIS, to September 2021), Regional Database of Health Technology Assessment Reports of the Americas (BRISA/RedTESA, to September 2021), Nursing Database (BDENF, to September 2021), Index Psychology (IndexPsi, to September 2021), and the WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing (WHO IRIS, to September 2021). The date the search was conducted was September 24, 2021 and no starting date restrictions, or language restrictions, were imposed. The search strategy was adapted for each database to achieve more specificity and sensitivity. Duplicate records across databases were removed. We searched the gray literature including the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD). In addition, reference lists of relevant primary studies were hand searched and experts in the field were contacted to obtain additional unpublished data where feasible.

Selection of studies

Reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts identified by the literature search using online software Covidence (https://www.covidence.org), obtained full-text articles of all potentially relevant studies, and evaluated them against the eligibility criteria. Reviewers resolved disagreement by discussion or, if necessary, with third party adjudication. We also considered studies reported only as abstracts and we attempted to contact study authors for additional information where needed. We recorded the selection process and documented via a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram

PRISMA flow diagram

Data synthesis and statistical analysis

We performed a systematic review of studies with pooled analysis of proportions [10, 11], using the method of Stuart-Ord (inverse double arcsine square root) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Only case series and cross-sectional studies were considered for quantitative analysis; case reports were excluded. To avoid bias related to the effect of delayed implementation of dietary management in late treated patients, only early-diagnosed patients (ie, diagnosed within first three months of life) were included. Studies that did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age were excluded from the meta-analysis as well as those that did not separate data for the early- or late-diagnosed patients. Since we expected that there were both clinical and methodological differences among the included studies, a random-effects model [12] was used to perform the pooled analysis of proportions [10, 11]. The meta-analysis was performed with the StatsDirect software, version 2.8.0. (StatsDirect Ltd, Altrincham, Cheshire, UK).

Results

Study selection

Our initial searches identified 3917 citations (n = 3854 from electronic searches; n = 63 identified through the gray literature). After removing duplicates from different databases, 3081 potentially relevant articles were further assessed using title and abstract review. A total of 202 articles were identified for full text assessment. After screening the full texts, we included 79 studies with 11 further publications (ie, multiple publications of the same set of patients) (47 cross-sectional studies, 18 case series, 12 case reports, and two retrospective cohort studies) with a total of 4090 patients [7, 18-17-106]. The reasons for exclusion are listed in the PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1). When studies were presented in more than one publication, all applicable references were included. Six of the included studies were published only as an abstract [13-19], ten studies as a thesis [20-29], and the majority (n = 57) were published as full-text in peer-reviewed journals [14, 28, 30–74]. Seven further studies [27, 29, 75–79] were published initially as a thesis followed by a full-text publication [34, 43, 80–83]. When information regarding risk of bias or other aspects related to study criteria were unavailable in the methods, we attempted to contact study authors for additional information.

Study characteristics

Sixty-four of the 79 included studies reported at least one patient-important outcome at individual or population level, and they are displayed in Table 1 for study characteristics. Regarding study design, 18 were case series [22, 23, 33, 34, 40–42, 45, 54, 55, 58, 60, 70, 84–87], 47 cross-sectional studies [6, 7, 13–15, 17–21, 24, 26, 29, 30, 35–39, 43, 46, 47, 53, 56, 59, 61, 62, 67, 68, 71, 73, 75–77, 79–81, 88–91], 13 case reports [34, 44, 48, 51, 63, 64, 69, 74, 84, 87, 92–94], and two cohort studies [57, 95].
Table 1

All LATAM PKU studies evaluating at least one of the pre-specified patient-important or economic burden outcomes (N = 64)

Author, yearLATAM country#of patientsAge, Mean¥ (SD), yFemale (%)Phenotype (%)Exclusion criteriaIndividual and/or population outcomesType of burden outcomesSpecific outcomesEarly or late diagnosed**Specify the type of treatmentAge (days) at start of treatmentFollow-up (months)Reasons why the study was excluded from the analysis
Benítez et al. 2001 [32]Uruguay2120.0NRNRIndividual and economicNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsMental disorders—repetitive behaviors (rocking, flapping, etc.); motor deficits—march with aid; speech deficits—only emits a wordNRNRNRNRNot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Bernal, 2017 [33]Argentina3NR100.0NR (66.66) and classic (33.33)NRIndividual and economicPatient adherence to clinical recommendationsNREarly (66.7%) and late (33.3%)Phe-restricted diet3.80**NRNot included as did not report data separately for early versus late treated
Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsSpeech deficits; intellectual disability; aggressiveness; low frustration tolerance
Cornejo et al. 1995 [42] $Chile1718.8NRNRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsSlight retardation; normal mental developmentEarlyPhe-restricted diet and education program20.3**·NRIncluded in Fig. 3D
Cornejo et al. 2003 [41] $Chile1919.9¢52.63NRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsLow motor developmentEarlyDirect breast feeding, and a special formula without Phe19.9**6Included in Fig. 3E
Cornejo et al. 2012 [40] $Chile1840 to 20₠46.73Classic and moderate (NR)NRIndividualOverweight and obesityEarlyPhe-restricted diet and education program18NRIncluded in Fig. 4A and B
Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsAverage total IQ in preschoolers, schoolers and teenagers
Diament & Lefevre, 1967 [45]Brazil64.3666.66NRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsIrritability; language delay; mental retardation; hyperactive patientLatePhe-restricted dietNRNRNot included as population was not early diagnosed/treated
Figueira, 2018 [22] $Brazil789.259.0Classic (100.0)Patients with less than 4 consultations in medical records and whose medical records are not filled outIndividualPatient adherence to clinical recommendationsNon-adherence to Phe-restricted dietEarly (56.4%) and late (43.6)Phe-restricted dietNRNR

Included in Figs. 3C, E, F, and 4E

Not included as did not report data separately for early versus late treated

Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsLearning disability; neuropsychomotor development delay; neuromotor restriction; aggressivenes; autistic behaviour; speech deficits
Gelvez et al. 2016 [54]Colombia41375.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividual and economicNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsSpeech deficits; neuropsychomotor development delay; aggressiveness; anxiety; attention deficit symptoms; executive function deficitLatePhe-restricted diet and education program13**NRNot included as population was not early diagnosed/treated
Skin problemsHypopigmentation
Socioeconomic impactPoor school performance
Jiménez-Péres et al. 2015 [55] $Mexico6733.33Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsGlobal neurodevelopment impairmentLateNR690NR

Included in Fig. 4C

Not included as population was not early diagnosed/treated

Skin problemsEczema skin; lightening of the skin
Lamônica et al. 2012 [58] $Brazil10NR40.0NRChronic diseaseIndividualExecutive function deficitReceptive auditory, expressive auditory and visual functionsEarlyPhe-restricted diet and mixed formulaBefore 30 days of lifeNRIncluded in Figs. 3A, C; 4D, and 5
Mahfoud et al. 2008 [60] $Venezuela5NR40.0Classic (60.0) and mild (40.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsGlobal development impairment; isolation; hyperactivity; speech deficitsEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula480NRIncluded in Fig. 3A, C, F, and 4D
Executive function deficitIrritability; sleeping disorder
Martins, 2007 [23]Brazil159 to 29₠66.7NRNRIndividualOverweight and obesityNRPhe-restricted dietNR6Not included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
OsteopeniaOsteopenia
Queiroz & Pondé, 2015 [84]Brazil8NR37.5NRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsHyperactivity; attention deficit; aggressiveness; intellectual disability; autismEarly (50%) Late (50%)Phe-restricted diet3,698**NRNot included as did not report data separately for early versus late treated
Sánchez-Peña et al. 2008 [85]Mexico35.6100.0Classic (66.6) and moderate (33.3)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsPersonal-social development delay; adaptive-motor delay; language delay; hyperactivity; aggressiveness; irritability; autistic behaviourEarly (66.7%) Late (33.3%)Phe-restricted diet and special formula2,044**At least 3Not included as did not report data separately for early versus late treated
Silva et al. 2016 [70]Brazil36NR52.77NRNRIndividualPatient adherence to clinical recommendationsNoncompliance to treatmentEarly (80.55%)Phe-restricted dietNRNRNot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Steiner et al. 2007 [86]Brazil317.3333.33NRNRIndividual and economicNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsBody shaking; autism spectrum disorder; no verbal language; aggressivenes; hyperactivityEarlyPhe-restricted dietNRNRNot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Socioeconomic impactSchool for autistic children
Impact of PKU on caregiver health-related quality of lifeDid not acquire toilet training
Tanaka et al. 2018 [72]Brazil181039.0NRPatients who did not adhere to the dietary treatment (evaluated by the food anamnesis) associated with no intake of elemental formula free of Phe in the recommended amount and those who were receiving a drug supplement of calciumIndividualOverweight or obeseNRPhe-restricted diet and special formulaNR34¢Not included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Valle et al. 2019 [87] Argentina1332 months to adulthoodNRModerate (30.8), mild (67.6), and HPA (33.08)NRIndividual

Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments

Others

Neurocognitive evaluation

Successful pregnancies

Patient adherence to clinical recommendations

Early (24.06%) and late (3.75%)Phe-restricted diet + protein substitute (54.13%); Phe-restricted diet + glycomacropeptides (1.50%); and diet counselling (31.57%); BH4 (9.77%)NRUntil age five and monthly thereafterNot included as did not report data separately for early versus late treated
Andere et al. 1988£ [96] $Brazil354* to 11₠48.57Classic (100.0)NRIndividualSkin problemsKeratosis pilaris, ammonia dermatitis, dry skin, reticular livedo and dermographism; during the dietary treatment darkening of skin, hair and eyes; lightening of the skin and hairNRPhe-restricted dietNRNAIncluded in Fig. 4C
Beckhauser et al. 2020 [31] $Brazil341247.0NRPatient who started treatment after 60 days of age, who failed to maintain Phe levels below 6 mg/dL or who failed to adhere to regular medical follow-upsIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsADHDEarlyRegularly treated since birth according to the “Brazilian Phenylketonuria Clinical and Therapeutic Guidelines”, consisting of a diet and protein formula diet, with Phe restrictionsBefore 60 days of life (treated since birth)NAIncluded in Fig. 3A
Brandalize, 2004 [75, 88]Brazil320 to 6₠56.3NR (84.40) and moderate (16)Children who started early treatment in the pioneering program of the Association of Parents and Friends of the Exceptional of São Paulo (APAE-SP), late diagnoses, and early diagnosis due to age above the rest of the group (11, 13 and 14 years)IndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsLow development of gross motor function; mean gross motor function of PKU and HPAP children; for PKU and HPAP, low development of gross motor functionEarlyPhe-restricted dietFor PKU, 8 days to 30 days after born (n = 23 patients) and 31 days to 60 days after born (n = 4 patients); for HPAP, 2 months to 1 year after born (n = 5 patients)NANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Pardo-Campos et al. [3537]£Argentina308 to 11₠10.4NRNRIndividual and economic

Executive function deficit

Impact of PKU on caregiver health-related quality of life

Coping strategies (facing conflicts, relationship with impulsivity); cognitive profile; organization; IQ; memory, visuospatial skills, reaction times, processing speed or in language

Parenting styles perceived by the children

EarlyNRNRNANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Chiesa et al. 2012 [38]ArgentinaNRNRNRNRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsNRNRPhe-restricted diet, and free animal foodNRNANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Camatta, 2020 [76, 80] $Brazil941453.0NRTetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) deficiency, use of pacemaker, pregnancy, growth-related disorder, and abandonment of treatment over the two previous yearsIndividualOverweight and obeseEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formulaUp to 30 days of lifeNAIncluded in Fig. 4A
Castro et al. 2012 [77, 81]Brazil636 to 12₠52.4Classic (82.5) and mild (17.5)Not having a free and informed consent form; child's disagreement; and lack of information on Phe dosages of the transferred patientsIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsIntellectually disabled from total IQEarlyPhe-restricted dietUp to 90 days after bornNANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Cerqueira, 2004 [20]Brazil10134.23§84.2NANRNRNRNRNRNRNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Colombo et al. 1988 [39] $Chile443.11NRNRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsLanguage delay; isolated psychomotor developmental delay; mental retardation; hyperactivity; irritability; psychomotor or mental retardation; psychometric evaluation; MRILatePhe-restricted diet3 years 11 monthsNA

Included in Fig. 3A, C, and D

Not included as population was not early diagnosed/treated

Da Silva et al. 2020 [43]Brazil3117.451.6Classic (30.8) and mild (69.2)To be in an irregular clinical follow-up in the last 12 months; (2) to have a clinical diagnosis of intellectual disability or diagnosis of other associated genetic, psychiatric, or neurological diseases which compromise the assessment of ADHDIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsADHDLatePhe-restricted diet and special formula26**NANot included as population was not early diagnosed/treated
Dutra et al. 2013£ [21]Brazil219.5242.9Classic (4.76) and mild (57.14) and HPAP (38.1)Children and adolescents whose parents or legal guardians have not signed the ICF; with confirmed diagnosis of neurological and / or psychiatric illness or other syndromes that cause delays in cognitive developmentIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsNeuropsychological assessment; executive function of IQ; verbal of IQ; verbal comprehension index; perceptual organization index; distraction resistance index; StroopEarlyNRUp to 90 days after bornNANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Executive function deficitProcessing speed index; RAVLT total score; Late RAVLT; RAVLT recognition; RVDLT total score; Late RVDLT; RVDLT recognition; time for test (seconds) for TMT A and B; number of errors for TMT A and B
Gejão et al. 2009 [53] $Brazil251 to 10₠NRNRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsAlterations in fine motor adaptative, gross motor, language, and personal-social behaviour; motor alterations; language alterations; cognitive alterations; self-care alterations; socialization alterations; alterations in expressive auditory, receptive auditory, and visual auditory; LDES; alterations in PPVT, and Total Score ABFW Child Language Test-phonology; alterations in Visual reception, auditory association, visual association, auditory memory, visual memory, auditory closure, grammatical closure, visual closure, verbal expression, manual expression, sounds combination; difficulty in attention time maintenance; hyperactivityEarlyAccording to national guidelinesUp to 30 days of lifeNAIncluded in Figs. 3A, E, and F
Kanufre et al. 2015 [56]Brazil589.1548.27NRNRIndividualOverweightOverweightNRPhe-restricted dietNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Keselman 2005 et al. [17]£Argentina118.7 to 13₠18.28Classic (100.0)NRIndividualOsteopeniaBone mineralization and lumbar spineEarlyPhe-restricted dietNRNANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Lamônica et al. 2015 [59] $Brazil1710.236.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividual and economicNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsADHD; IQ; low Reading School Performance Test—Number of patients classified as Inferior; low Writing School Performance Test—Number of patients classified as Inferior; irritabilityEarlyPhe-restricted diet76.47% before 30 days of life and 23.53% after 30 days of lifeNAIncluded in Figs. 3A, C; 4D, and 5
Executive function deficitPeabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Number of patients classified as Low
Sleeping disordersSleeping disorder
Socioeconomic impactPoor school performance
Malloy-Diniz et al. 2004 [61] £Brazil21274¢61.9NRAverage phe level below 120 μmol/lIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsBayley Scale of Infant DevelopmentEarlyPhe-restricted diet27.5**NANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Executive function deficitA not B task Piaget
Mancini et al. 2010 [62] £$Brazil337.6752.38NRNRIndividualPatient adherence to clinical recommendationsSerum PKUEarlyPhe-restricted dietUp to 21 days of lifeNAIncluded in Fig. 4E
Martins et al. 2020 [30]Brazil228Newborn, 90%; between 1 and 5 years old, 8%; and over 10 years old (2%)21.49NRNRIndividual and economic

Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments

Socioeconomic impact; the impact of PKU on the daily lives of patients and caregivers; the main difficulties faced by PKU patients and their caregivers; cognitive and emotional symptoms

Irritability, anxiety, and lack of concentration

Financial impact related to the PKU management; stop working to care for the PKU patient; need to hire a caregiver to assist the PKU patient; absence of neuropsychological care; did not receive the support of a day-to-day psychologist; limitation on social activities; impact on professional life; and effect on self-esteem

Early (89.92%) and late (10.08%)Phe-restricted diet and supplementsNRNANot included as did not report data separately for early versus late treated
Mendes, 2006 [19]Brazil17NR70.58NRNRIndividualOsteopeniaOsteopeniaNRPhe-restricted dietNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Morão, 2017 71]Brazil20NRNRNRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsVerbal fluency test; Children Behavior Checklist 6/18; Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV); Word and Pseudoword Reading Competency Test; Snap automatic naming test; SNAP—IV (attention deficits)NRNRNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Executive function deficitChildren Gambling Task; delay of gratification adapted; Rey complex figure; five digit test; RAVLT
Nalin et al. 2010 [66]Brazil451149.0NR (18.0) and classic (53.0) and mild (29.0)NRIndividualPatient adherence to clinical recommendationsPatient adherence to treatmentEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula90NANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Viera Neto et al. 2018 [67] £ $Brazil516 to 17₠43.13NR (2.0) and classic (64.7) and mild/moderate (33.3)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsIntellectual capacity classified as below average or intellectual defectiveEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula48NAIncluded in Figs. 3B and 4E
QoLTotal score; physical health; emotional functioning; social functioning; school functioning; psychosocial health
Patient adherence to clinical recommendationsAdequate serum PKU levels
Paneque et al. 2013 [68]Cuba12NRNRNRNRIndividual and economicNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsIntelligence test, group attention test, and psychometric test (Weil's non-verbal intelligence test)NRPhe-restricted dietNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
OverweightOverweight according to the growth and development tables of the Cuban population (weight for height, height for age and weight for age)
Skin problemsSkin alterations
OsteopeniaBone alterations
Socioeconomic impactCurrent worker
Peredo et al. 2010 [89]Chile2013.4100.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsIQEarlySpecial milk-based formula17.9**NANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
OverweightOverweight
Pérsico et al. 2019 [97]Brazil151653.33Classic (53.3) and mild (46.7)Presence of associated comorbidities and/or use of medications unrelated to specific diet therapy with the possibility of interfering with bone metabolismIndividualOverweightOverweightNRPhe-restricted diet, special formula, and supplementNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Poloni et al. 2021 [7]Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Dominican Republic, Panama, Uruguay, and CubaNRNRNRNRNRIndividual and economic

Poor adherence

Low purchasing power, limited/insufficient availability of low-protein foods, lack of technical resources to manage the diet, and did not have low-protein foods; no alternative treatments available

NRPhe-restricted diet, unflavored powdered amino acid substitutesNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Sena, 2018 [26]Brazil316.548.4NRPatients who were not accompanied by legal guardians advised at the time of collection, individuals hospitalized in any hospital units and patients who were diagnosed with chronic non-communicable diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and cancerIndividualOverweightOverweightNRPhe-restricted dietNRNANot included as did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age
Silva, 2010£ [98] £ $Brazil105.1850.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsHyperactivity; attention deficit; below average for personal-social area; below average for adaptative, language, gross motor, and fine motor; vocabulary classified as below average; mild to moderate speech disorder; deficit for personal-social area, fine motor-adaptative area, language area, and gross motor areaEarlyPhe-restricted diet5.18**NAIncluded in Fig. 3A, E, and F
Silva, 2016 [91]Brazil2415.850.0Classic (50.0) and mild (50.0)There was no exclusion criterion for samplesIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatricNeuropsychomotor impairment; behavioral alterationsEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula92.29**NANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Silva, 2018 [78]$Brazil3117.451.6Classic (51.6) and mild (48.4)Have a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, severe or profound intellectual disability; have a diagnosis of other associated genetic diseases, depression, bipolar mood disorder or epileptic encephalopathyIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric

ADHD

Osteopenia

EarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula26NAIncluded in Fig. 3A
Osteopenia
Silveira et al. 2021 [71]$Brazil10114.045.5Classic (56.4) and mild (43.6)Patients with late diagnosis and patients diagnosed with tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) deficiencyIndividualOverweight and obesityEarlyNRNRNAIncluded in Fig. 4A, and B
Teruya, 2019 [79, 82]Brazil231839.0Classic (47.8) and mild (52.2)NANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paperPatient adherence to clinical recommendationsPoor current adherence to Phe-restricted diet; poor current median adherence to Phe-restricted dietEarly (65.2%)Phe-restricted diet and special formulaUp to 90 days after born
Tonon et al. 2019 [73]£Brazil2519.352.0Classic (52.0) and mild (48.0)NRIndividualOverweight or obeseEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula52.8**NANot included as quantitative data on outcome of interest not provided in paper
Vieira, 2010 [29]$Brazil561255.35NR (12.5), classic (58.9) and mild (28.6)NRIndividual and economicNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatricMental retardation; learning disability; hyperactivity; aggressiveness; attention deficitEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula60NAIncluded in Figs. 3A, C, D, 4E, and 5
Patient adherence to clinical recommendationsNonadherent to treatment
Socioeconomic impactSpecial Education
Blanco et al. 2012 [34]Argentina134100.0Mild (100.0)NRIndividualExecutive function deficitMental retardation mild-moderateLatePhe-restricted diet34 years3Not included due to design
De Lucca et al. 2017 [44]Ecuador115100.0NRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsAutism; psychomotor retardationEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula3 years and 11 monthsNRNot included due to design
Executive function deficitDelayed severe mental
Skin problemsMusty smell; hair hypopigmentation
Escaf, 2003 [48]Colombia1NRNRHPAP (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsIrritability; sporadic seizuresNRPhe-restricted dietNRNRNot included due to design
Skin problemsEczema
OthersVomiting
Figueiró-Filho et al. 2004 [51]Brazil122100.0NRNRIndividualOthersMaternal PKULatePhe-restricted diet and supplementation with protein hydrolyzate22NRNot included due to design
Mariño & Zarzalejo, 2000 [63]Venezuela10.10.0HPA (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsMotor deficits; mental developmentEarlyBreastfeeding and special formula289Not included due to design
Skin problemsErythema
Patient adherence to clinical recommendationsAdherence to Phe-restricted diet
Menezes et al. 2019 [64]Brazil182¢100.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsPsychomotor retardation; language impairmentEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula associated with the milk formula40NRNot included due to design
Executive function deficitAdynamia
Skin problemsPale skin; hair loss
Patient adherence to clinical recommendationsPoor acceptance of the diet
OthersWeight-height deficit; vomiting
Patricio & Maritza, 2018 [92]Ecuador129Φ0.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsSeizures; neurological complicationsEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula306Not included due to design
Executive function deficitAxial hypotonia
OthersPersistent respiratory acidosis; abdominal distention
Pereda-Torales et al. 2008 [93]Mexico10.20.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsNeuropsychomotor developmentEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula6012Not included due to design
Patient adherence to clinical recommendationsAdherence to Phe-restricted diet
Rasner et al. 2014 [90]Uruguay110*0.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsLosing the cephalic support; irritability; myoclonia of all four members; hypotoniaEarlyNR10 monthsNRNot included due to design
Executive function deficitRegression of the tracking with the look; regression picking up objects
Santos & Haack, 2013 [94]Brazil15100.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsSeizuresEarlyPhe-restricted diet and special formula2060Not included due to design
OthersGastroesophageal reflux; bronchitis; vomiting
Schmidt et al. 2016 [69]Brazil1130.0NRNRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsHypoactivityEarlyPhe-restricted dietNRNRNot included due to design
OthersMegaloblastic anemia
Urbanes et al. 2006 [74]Colombia180.0Classic (100.0)NRIndividualNeurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairmentsRestless; aggressive; inconsistent language; neuromotor restriction; intellectual deterioration; poor socializationLateNANANRNot included due to design

ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, HPA hyperphenylalaninemia, HPAP hyperphenylalaninemia persistent, IQ intelligence quotient, LATAM Latin America, LDES Total Score Language Development Evaluation Scale, NR not reported, NA not applicable, Phe phenylalanine, PKU phenylketonuria, PPVT alterations in Total Score Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, RAVLT Rey auditive verbal learning test, RVDLT Rey visual design learning test, SD standard deviation, TMT (partes A e B) Trail making test (partes A e B), USP Universidade de São Paulo, UFMG Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, y years

***We considered that late diagnosed refers to children diagnosed between the ages of 3 months to 7 years (≥ 3 months to < 7 years); untreated PKU refers to patients untreated by 7 years of age and over

¢Days

*Months

**Mean

·Only in two was it done after 30 days

#Number

₠Range

£Comparative cross-sectional studies

ΦWeeks of gestational age

§Caregivers’ age

¥For the case reports, age is expressed as absolute number

$Included in the analysis

All LATAM PKU studies evaluating at least one of the pre-specified patient-important or economic burden outcomes (N = 64) Included in Figs. 3C, E, F, and 4E
Fig. 3

Proportional meta-analysis of neurological, neurocognitive, and neuropsychiatric impairments outcomes in early-diagnosed PKU patients. (A) ADHD and hyperactivity. (B) Intellectual disability. (C) Irritability and aggressiveness. (D) Mental disorders. (E) Motor delay. (F) Speech and language deficits

Fig. 4

Proportional meta-analysis of other outcomes in early-diagnosed PKU patients. (A) Obesity. (B) Overweight. (C) Skin alterations. (D) Sleeping disorders. (E) Patient adherence to clinical recommendations

Not included as did not report data separately for early versus late treated Included in Fig. 4C Not included as population was not early diagnosed/treated Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments Others Neurocognitive evaluation Successful pregnancies Patient adherence to clinical recommendations Executive function deficit Impact of PKU on caregiver health-related quality of life Coping strategies (facing conflicts, relationship with impulsivity); cognitive profile; organization; IQ; memory, visuospatial skills, reaction times, processing speed or in language Parenting styles perceived by the children Included in Fig. 3A, C, and D Not included as population was not early diagnosed/treated Neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments Socioeconomic impact; the impact of PKU on the daily lives of patients and caregivers; the main difficulties faced by PKU patients and their caregivers; cognitive and emotional symptoms Irritability, anxiety, and lack of concentration Financial impact related to the PKU management; stop working to care for the PKU patient; need to hire a caregiver to assist the PKU patient; absence of neuropsychological care; did not receive the support of a day-to-day psychologist; limitation on social activities; impact on professional life; and effect on self-esteem Poor adherence Low purchasing power, limited/insufficient availability of low-protein foods, lack of technical resources to manage the diet, and did not have low-protein foods; no alternative treatments available ADHD Osteopenia ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, HPA hyperphenylalaninemia, HPAP hyperphenylalaninemia persistent, IQ intelligence quotient, LATAM Latin America, LDES Total Score Language Development Evaluation Scale, NR not reported, NA not applicable, Phe phenylalanine, PKU phenylketonuria, PPVT alterations in Total Score Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, RAVLT Rey auditive verbal learning test, RVDLT Rey visual design learning test, SD standard deviation, TMT (partes A e B) Trail making test (partes A e B), USP Universidade de São Paulo, UFMG Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, y years ***We considered that late diagnosed refers to children diagnosed between the ages of 3 months to 7 years (≥ 3 months to < 7 years); untreated PKU refers to patients untreated by 7 years of age and over ¢Days *Months **Mean ·Only in two was it done after 30 days #Number ₠Range £Comparative cross-sectional studies ΦWeeks of gestational age §Caregivers’ age ¥For the case reports, age is expressed as absolute number $Included in the analysis Forty of the included studies were conducted in Brazil [14, 19–24, 26, 27, 29, 31, 43, 45, 51, 56, 58, 59, 62, 64, 67, 69–73, 75–78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 86, 88, 91, 94, 97, 98], seven in Argentina [15, 17, 18, 33–38, 46, 47], five in Chile [39–42, 89], three each in Colombia [48, 54, 74] and Mexico [55, 85, 93], two each in Ecuador [44, 92], Venezuela [60, 63] and Uruguay [32, 90], and one in Cuba [68]. One study [87] was a multicenter conducted in Ecuador, Bolivia, and Paraguay. The case series and cross-sectional studies sample size ranged from two [32] to 420 patients [46, 47]. Patients’ ages ranged from a mean of 3.11 [20] to 19.3 [73] years old (Table 1). The type of patient-important outcomes most frequently reported among the cross-sectional and case series studies were neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments (n = 33 studies, 50.8%) [21, 22, 24, 27, 30–33, 38–40, 43, 45, 53–55, 59–61, 67, 68, 77, 78, 81, 83–89, 91, 98], followed by overweight (n = 11, 16.9%) [23, 26, 40, 56, 68, 71–73, 76, 80, 89, 97], patient adherence to clinical recommendations (n = 10, 15.4%) [7, 22, 33, 62, 66, 67, 70, 79, 82, 83, 87], executive function deficit (n = 6, 92.3%) [21, 24, 58–61], socioeconomic impact (n = 7, 10.8%) [7, 29, 30, 54, 59, 68, 83, 86], skin problems (n = 4, 6.2%) [54, 55, 68, 96], osteopenia (n = 5, 7.7%) [17–19, 23, 27, 68, 78], followed by impact of PKU on caregiver health-related quality of life, quality of life and sleeping disorders (n = 2, 3.1%) [30, 59, 67, 86]. The majority of the cross-sectional, case series, and case report studies (83.1%, n = 64) reported only on patient-important outcomes at an individual level (Table 1). Among the 12 case report studies, the majority (83.3%, n = 10) assessed neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments [44, 48, 63, 64, 74, 90, 92–94], executive function deficit [34, 44, 64, 90, 92], skin problems [43, 48, 63, 64], and patient adherence to clinical recommendations [23, 25, 61]. Six case report studies [48, 51, 64, 69, 92, 94] evaluated other outcomes such as vomiting [48, 64, 94], weight-height deficit [64], abdominal distention [68], persistent respiratory acidosis [68], gastroesophageal reflux [94], bronchitis [94], megaloblastic anemia [69], and maternal phenylketonuria [51] (Table 1). Additional file 2: Table 2 describes the 15 studies evaluating other patient-important or economic burden outcomes than those pre-specified for this review; all of these, except for three studies [15, 46, 47, 49], reported that patients received a Phe-restricted diet and/or a Phe-free amino acid fortified medical food. Six studies out of 15 did not report whether patients were receiving treatment [15, 25, 46, 47, 52, 65]. Additional file 3: Table 3 provides additional details around the specific pre-specified patient-important or economic burden outcomes reported among the 12 case report studies. Five out of the 12 studies reported psychosocial outcomes (ie, severe mental retardation and autism, irritability, aggressiveness and intellectual deterioration) [44, 48, 64, 74, 90]; four on physical outcomes (ie, psychomotor retardation) [44, 64, 74, 90]; one study reported on other outcomes (ie, maternal phenylketonuria) [51]; and two studies reported socioeconomic results (ie, delay in school performance, poor socialization, and withdrawal from formal schooling) [64, 74].

Risk of bias assesment

Figure 2 and Additional files 4 and 5: Tables 4 and 5 describe the risk of bias assessment. Overall, the included studies presented a low risk of bias in the majority of the domains. In the cross-sectional studies (Fig. 2, panel A), at least one of the following domains of sample size, statistical significance, statistics methods, or demographic data were rated as “high risk of bias” in five studies (12.8%) [7, 38, 39, 43, 96]. In the case series studies (Fig. 2, panel B), three domains (ie, clear description of both patient’s history and post-intervention clinical condition, and description of a takeaway lesson) were rated as “high risk of bias” in three studies (25.0%) [32, 58, 86].
Fig. 2

Risk of bias assessment. (A) cross-sectional studies. (B) case series studies

Risk of bias assessment. (A) cross-sectional studies. (B) case series studies

Meta-analysis results

The results were pooled from case series and cross-sectional studies that reported data only on early-diagnosed patients to avoid bias related to the effects of delayed implementation of dietary management in late-diagnosed patients. Studies that did not provide quantitative data on outcome of interest in papers were also excluded from analysis as well as studies that did not report whether the treatment was implemented at an early or late age. Therefore, out of 67 included studies [14, 16, 19–29, 31–34, 39–45, 48–50, 52–57, 59–70, 72–86, 88–101], 20 studies [22, 29, 31, 39–42, 52, 55, 59, 60, 62, 66, 67, 76, 77, 77, 78, 80, 83, 96, 98] qualified for the quantitative analysis described below. None of the included studies evaluating early-diagnosed PKU patients reported symptoms including headache and fatigue, quality of life, or the impact of PKU on the healthcare system.

Neurological, neurocognitive, and neuropsychiatric impairments

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and hyperactivity

The pooled proportion of ADHD and hyperactivity was 40% [95% CI 0.21 to 0.61; I2 = 89.2%, p < 0.0001] from eight studies [29, 31, 39, 53, 59, 60, 78, 83, 98] with a total of 222 patients (Fig. 3A). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses. Proportional meta-analysis of neurological, neurocognitive, and neuropsychiatric impairments outcomes in early-diagnosed PKU patients. (A) ADHD and hyperactivity. (B) Intellectual disability. (C) Irritability and aggressiveness. (D) Mental disorders. (E) Motor delay. (F) Speech and language deficits

Autism, intellectual disability, irritability and aggressiveness

A single study [49] evaluated early-diagnosed PKU patients who were reported to have autism. Out of 78 patients assessed, two were diagnosed with autistic behaviour. The pooled proportion of intellectual disability was 18% [95% CI 0.04–0.38; I2 = 83.7%, p = 0.0133] from two studies [67, 77, 81] including a total of 114 patients (Fig. 3B). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses. The pooled proportion of irritability and aggressiveness was 44% [95% CI 0.12–0.80; I2 = 96.2%, p < 0.0001] from five studies [22, 29, 39, 59, 60, 83] with a total of 200 patients (Fig. 3C). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses.

Mental disorders

The pooled proportion of mental disorder was 16% [95% CI 0.01–0.42; I2 = 89.7%, p < 0.0001] from three studies [29, 39, 42, 83] with a total of 115 patients (Fig. 3 D). A study [42] that reported slight retardation was also considered in this analysis. There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses.

Motor delay

The pooled proportion of motor delay was 15% [95% CI 0.04–0.30; I2 = 74.5%, p = 0.0083] from four studies [22, 27, 41, 53, 98] with a total of 132 patients (Fig. 3E). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses. Any report of motor delay such as low motor development, neuromotor restriction [22], and deficit for gross motor area [27, 98] was considered.

Speech and language deficits

The pooled proportion of speech and language deficits was 35% [95% CI 0.08–0.68; I2 = 93.9%, p < 0.0001] from five studies [22, 27, 39, 53, 60, 98] with a total of 162 patients (Fig. 3F). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses. Additional reports of speech delay included speech deficits such as “only emits a word” [32], alterations in language [53], and mild to moderate speech disorder [27, 98] were reported.

Other comorbidities

Obesity and overweight

The pooled proportion of obesity was 12% [95% CI 0.09–0.15; I2 = 0%, p = 0.6129] from three studies [40, 71, 76, 80] with a total of 379 patients (Fig. 4, panel A). There was no significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses. Proportional meta-analysis of other outcomes in early-diagnosed PKU patients. (A) Obesity. (B) Overweight. (C) Skin alterations. (D) Sleeping disorders. (E) Patient adherence to clinical recommendations The pooled proportion of overweight was 11% [95% CI 0.07–0.16; I2 = 47.2%, p = 0.1504] from three studies [40, 71, 76, 80] with a total of 379 patients (Fig. 4B). There was no significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses.

Osteopenia

Only one study [43, 78] evaluating early-diagnosed PKU patients reported on osteopenia. Out of 31 patients, three were diagnosed with osteopenia.

Skin alterations

The pooled proportion of skin alterations was 34% [95% CI 4.9E-3 to 0.85; I2 = 85.7%, p = 0.0081] from two studies [55, 96] with a total of 40 patients (Fig. 4 C). Both included studies reporting lightening of the skin. There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses.

Sleeping disorders

The pooled proportion of sleeping disorders was 71% [95% CI 0.13–0.99; I2 = 86.2%, p = 0.007] from two studies [59, 60] with a total of 22 patients (Fig. 4D). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses.

Patient adherence to clinical recommendations after treatment

The pooled proportion of patient adherence to clinical recommendation was 53% [95% CI 0.38 to 0.67; I2 = 83.7%, p < 0.0001] from five studies [22, 29, 62, 66, 67, 83] with a total of 260 patients (Fig. 4E). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses.

Socioeconomic impact

The pooled proportion of socioeconomic impact was 37% [95% CI 0.07–0.75; I2 = 88.5%, p = 0.0032] from two studies [29, 59, 83] with a total of 73 patients (Fig. 5). There was significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses. The included studies reported the following socioeconomic impact: poor school performance [18], and special education [29, 83].
Fig. 5

Proportional meta-analysis of economic outcomes in early-diagnosed PKU patients

Proportional meta-analysis of economic outcomes in early-diagnosed PKU patients

Impact of phenylketonuria on caregiver health-related quality of life

The pooled proportion of impact of PKU on caregiver health-related quality of life (ie, did not acquire toilet training [32, 86]) was 42% [95% CI 0.09–0.80; I2 = 0%, p = 0.7519] from two studies [32, 86] with a total of five patients. There was no significant statistical heterogeneity in the analyses.

Descriptive analysis of single studies reporting the outcomes of interest

Four studies [24, 58, 59, 61] reported executive function outcomes with 41% being classified as below average in the assessment of receptive vocabulary using the Peabody Image Vocabulary Test [59]. Malloy-Diniz et al. [61] reported that PKU children with high blood Phe levels (ie, mean Phe levels between 360 and 600 μmol/L) performed significantly worse than both the PKU children with low blood Phe levels and the control children on tasks that assess executive functioning. Morão et al. [24] found that the patients also showed a loss in the score of the Children Gambling Task. Lamônica et al. [58] reported that out of 10 patients, two of them presented outside the normality standards in the development scales. The skills were related to performance in motor, linguistic and cognitive activities. Furthermore, Poloni et al. [7] reported that most LATAM countries did not have low-protein foods, including Phe-free amino acid fortified, and no alternative treatments available. Also, they found that low purchasing power, limited/insufficient availability of low-protein foods, poor adherence, and lack of technical resources to manage the diet were major barriers to treatment. And last, Martins et al. [30] reported that half of the parents and caregivers who completed the survey had financial burden related to PKU management, some had to stop working to care for the PKU patient, and others had to hire a caregiver to assist the PKU patient. With regards to patient’s complaints, irritability was the most reported affected symtom accounting for 78% of the patients, followed by anxiety (67%), and lack of concentration (58%). Despite these findings, 70% of the patients have never undergone a cognitive and/or executive function assessment, and limitation on social activities, impact on professional life, and the effect on self-esteem were also listed as barriers to receive appropriate assessments.

Discussion

Main findings

PKU is a genetic inborn error in the metabolism of Phe. The pathogenic variants that cause PKU are present in high frequency in some LATAM countries such as Brazil and Chile [102]. Based on pooled data from 21 case series and cross-sectional studies [19, 22–24, 26, 29, 31–33, 39, 40, 42, 44, 52, 56, 59, 60, 67, 70, 71, 78, 80–82, 84–86, 88, 96–98] including 1224 patients, we found evidence demonstrating the impact of PKU on affected individuals in LATAM, with pooled proportions of burden ranging from 9% with osteopenia to 53% with speech and language deficits. Furthermore, only 53% of patients were adherent to clinical recommendations with 37% of patients experiencing socioeconomic impact of PKU. These are higher rates as compared to what we were expecting given that there is the ability to effectively diagnose and treat PKU.Query

Strengths and limitations

Strengths of our review include a comprehensive search; assessment of eligibility, risk of bias and data abstraction independently and in duplicate; and an assessment of risk of bias that included a sensitivity analysis addressing homogeneity of study designs. The primary limitation of our study is the highly heterogeneous nature of study samples in all studied clinical burden outcomes, except for the outcomes of obesity (Fig. 4, Panel A), osteopenia, and impact of PKU on caregiver health-related quality of life. Sources of this heterogeneity include both clinical and methodological diversities. The studies differed considerably in their mean age of patient selection, phenotype, modalities of implementation of the treatment (eg, newborn screening, access to treatment, lack of knowledgeable caregivers), and study designs (ie, case series and cross-sectional). Furthermore, out of the 79 studies that met selection criteria, we were only able to include data in the meta-analysis from 21 of them (26.6%). The majority of the studies provided data on only one pre-specified outcome of interest, resulting in small sample sizes for many of the pooled analyses. In addition, there were studies that reported on late diagnosis patients and they were not included in the meta-analysis.

Relation to prior research

One systematic review [103] identified in the literature corroborates our findings showing that even with dietary treatment, long-term physical growth (ie, body weight, height/recumbent length, and body mass index) are not attained in PKU. Another systematic review [104] showed that bone mineral density was lower in PKU patients compared with a control group. With regards to the latter outcome, four studies [105-109] reported a prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis ranging from 5 to 14%, which encompass our findings. Although we did not evaluate anthropometric variables in our review, we found a reasonable high prevalence of overweight individuals (11%) and of obesity (12%). Furthermore, a frequent prevalence of being overweight was described in another systematic review [110] ranging from 7.8 to 32.6% in children and adolescents with PKU, which is also consistent with our findings (23%). A very high prevalence of ADHD and hyperactivity (40%) and a moderate rate of intellectual disability (19%) were found in our review, which is consistent with others systematic reviews [111, 112] indicating that they are more common in both children and adults with PKU, despite being early diagnosed. One study [113] conducted in the United States (US) showed that compared to the general population, PKU was associated with a significantly higher prevalence for intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, Tourette/tic disorders, eating disorders and behavior/conduct disorder in adult population. Of note, increased prevalence of these comorbidities persisted even when the sample was restricted to younger adults (aged 20–38 years), a subgroup with high probality of being diagnosed at birth and had the opportunity for continuos treatment throughout life. In parallel, a German study [114] not only corroborated that adults PKU patients suffered with neurospycholigical disease burden, but also revealed that this population presented additional comorbidities such as cardiometabolic risk factors. Also, these authors reported a higher intake of prescriptions for gastrointestinal agents, analgesics, antipyretics, statins, and antidepressants. Despite the methodological differences (both studies evaluated adult populations from a single country and were based on data retrieved from their respective healthcare systems), both studies are in line wth our findings that PKU potentially increases the neuropsychological comorbidities.

Conclusions

LATAM PKU patients presented with a high prevalence of clinical complications, regardless of whether there is the possibility of residual confounding due to publication bias and the high heterogeneity in the analysis. Although it is widely accepted that PKU treatment is needed for life, the current approach in LATAM is primarily by using dietary management, which does not seem sufficient to avoid the disease burden outcomes investigated in this research. Furthermore, this review showed that there is a high degree of poor adherence to clinical recommendations. This study also highlights the need to address well-conducted burden of illness studies in PKU patients in LATAM to further elucidate the full spectrum of complications seen in this disease, to inform the healthcare providers taking care of these patients as well as the public health authorities on the ongoing and significant complications of this genetic disorder. [115-118] Additional file 1: Table 1 Search strategy. Additional file 2: Table 2 Fifteen LATAM PKU included studies evaluating other outcomes than those pre-specified as patient-important or economic burden outcomes of interest. Additional file 3: Table 3 Reported pre-specified patient-important or economic burden outcomes on 12 LATAM PKU case reports studies. Additional file 4: Table 4 Risk of bias for cross-sectional studies. Additional file 5: Table 5 Risk of bias for case series studies. Additional file 6: Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, subgroup and sensitivity analyses, heterogeneity assessment and publication bias.
  52 in total

1.  Breastfeeding in the treatment of children with phenylketonuria.

Authors:  Viviane C Kanufre; Ana L P Starling; Ennio Leão; Marcos J B Aguiar; Jacqueline S Santos; Rosângelis D L Soares; Adriana M Silveira
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.197

2.  Relationships between phenylalanine levels, intelligence and socioeconomic status of patients with phenylketonuria.

Authors:  Isabel Pimenta Spínola Castro; Juliana Martins Borges; Heloísa Alves Chagas; Jacqueline Tibúrcio; Ana Lúcia Pimenta Starling; Marcos José Burle de Aguiar
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.197

3.  [Phenotypic and molecular characterization of a Colombian family with phenylketonuria].

Authors:  Nancy Gélvez; Johana Acosta; Greizy López; Derly Castro; Juan Carlos Prieto; Martha Bermúdez; Marta L Tamayo
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 0.935

4.  [Executive functions in children with phenylketonuria: variations as a function of phenilalanine plasm level].

Authors:  Leandro Fernandes Malloy-Diniz; Cláudia Cardoso-Martins; Karina Cunha Carneiro; Márcia Maria Magrille Cerqueira; Ana Paula Almeida Ferreira; Marcos José B de Aguiar; Ana Lúcia Starling
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 1.420

5.  [Clinical findings and mutational spectrum in Venezuelan patients with delayed diagnosis of phenylketonuria].

Authors:  A Mahfoud; M de Lucca; C L Domínguez; I Arias; L Casique; K Araujo; T Rodríguez; M Bottaro; A R Colmenares; M E López; R M Merzon
Journal:  Rev Neurol       Date:  2008 Jul 1-15       Impact factor: 0.870

6.  Genotype and natural history in unrelated individuals with phenylketonuria and autistic behavior.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Steiner; Angelina Xavier Acosta; Marilisa Mantovani Guerreiro; Antonia Paula Marques-de-Faria
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.420

7.  Communicative and psycholinguistic abilities in children with phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Mariana Germano Gejão; Amanda Tragueta Ferreira; Greyce Kelly Silva; Fernanda da Luz Anastácio-Pessan; Dionísia Aparecida Cusin Lamônica
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  OVERWEIGHT AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH PHENYLKETONURIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Berilany Dos Santos Sena; Maria Izabel Siqueira de Andrade; Ana Paula Ferreira da Silva; Keila Fernandes Dourado; Andressa Laís Ferreira Silva
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2020-03-09

9.  Bone Status in Patients with Phenylketonuria: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  María José de Castro; Carmela de Lamas; Paula Sánchez-Pintos; Domingo González-Lamuño; María Luz Couce
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Overweight/obesity in adolescents with phenylketonuria: protective and predisposing factors.

Authors:  Adriana Márcia Silveira; Poliane Lopes Lima; Michelle Rosa Andrade Alves; Rosângelis Del Lama Soares; Viviane de Cássia Kanufre; Valéria de Melo Rodrigues; Ana Lúcia Pimenta Starling; Rocksane de Carvalho Norton; Marcos José Burle de Aguiar
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.990

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.