Alessandro Cannavale1, Mariangela Santoni2,3, Piergiorgio Nardis1, Pierleone Lucatelli1, Mario Corona1, Giuseppe Cannavale1, Carlo Catalano1, Paolo Ricci4. 1. Department of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. 2. Department of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. mariangelasantoni@hotmail.it. 3. Department of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, 166 Viale del Policlinico, 00161, Rome, Italy. mariangelasantoni@hotmail.it. 4. Department of Emergency Radiology and Department of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the role of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of spondylodiscitis, identifying the best target structures for biopsy to increase the likelihood of positive cultures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board, and requirement for specific consent form was waived. In this retrospective single Institution study, we evaluated clinical and imaging records of 60 patients who underwent spine biopsy for suspected spondylodiscitis from January 2016 to May 2021. CT and MRI sensitivity and inter-reader agreement were assessed according to the phase of spondylodiscitis, defined as acute, subacute or chronic. Inter-reader agreement for the diagnosis and identification of spondylodiscitis phase was assessed using K statistics. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess any relationship between MRI/CT findings, spondylodiscitis phase and positive cultures. RESULTS: Sixty patients (48 males) with mean age 59, 2 ± 29 were enrolled in this study. MRI showed higher sensitivity (96% vs 65% of CT) in the diagnosis and good inter-reader agreement (k = 0.8) in the identification of the acute and subacute phase of spondylodiscitis, and moderate inter-reader agreement (k = 0.7) and lower sensitivity (80% vs 95% of CT) for the chronic phase. Univariate analysis showed as MRI-specific findings such as extensive hyperintensity of vertebral body and/or disc on Short Tau Inversion Recovery-T2w images, paravertebral collections, preserved or augmented disc height and presence of a vertebral fractures were mainly found in the acute/subacute phase and was a predictor for positive cultures (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MRI and CT are both able to identify the different phases of spondylodiscitis, although MRI is more sensitive in the acute phase. Findings such as extensive hyperintensity of the disc/vertebral body, fractures and paravertebral collections, represent the main targets for biopsy related to a positive culture.
PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the role of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of spondylodiscitis, identifying the best target structures for biopsy to increase the likelihood of positive cultures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board, and requirement for specific consent form was waived. In this retrospective single Institution study, we evaluated clinical and imaging records of 60 patients who underwent spine biopsy for suspected spondylodiscitis from January 2016 to May 2021. CT and MRI sensitivity and inter-reader agreement were assessed according to the phase of spondylodiscitis, defined as acute, subacute or chronic. Inter-reader agreement for the diagnosis and identification of spondylodiscitis phase was assessed using K statistics. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess any relationship between MRI/CT findings, spondylodiscitis phase and positive cultures. RESULTS: Sixty patients (48 males) with mean age 59, 2 ± 29 were enrolled in this study. MRI showed higher sensitivity (96% vs 65% of CT) in the diagnosis and good inter-reader agreement (k = 0.8) in the identification of the acute and subacute phase of spondylodiscitis, and moderate inter-reader agreement (k = 0.7) and lower sensitivity (80% vs 95% of CT) for the chronic phase. Univariate analysis showed as MRI-specific findings such as extensive hyperintensity of vertebral body and/or disc on Short Tau Inversion Recovery-T2w images, paravertebral collections, preserved or augmented disc height and presence of a vertebral fractures were mainly found in the acute/subacute phase and was a predictor for positive cultures (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MRI and CT are both able to identify the different phases of spondylodiscitis, although MRI is more sensitive in the acute phase. Findings such as extensive hyperintensity of the disc/vertebral body, fractures and paravertebral collections, represent the main targets for biopsy related to a positive culture.
Authors: Sarah C Foreman; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Jens Gempt; Pia M Jungmann; Victoria Kehl; Claire Delbridge; Nina Wantia; Claus Zimmer; Jan S Kirschke Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: My-Linh Nguyen; Bhargavi Guddanti; Marcos C Schechter; Monica Umpierrez; Philip Wong; Felix M Gonzalez; Adam D Singer Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Enrico Pola; F Taccari; G Autore; F Giovannenze; V Pambianco; R Cauda; G Maccauro; M Fantoni Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Jad S Husseini; Sina Habibollahi; Sandra B Nelson; Daniel I Rosenthal; Connie Y Chang Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Elie F Berbari; Souha S Kanj; Todd J Kowalski; Rabih O Darouiche; Andreas F Widmer; Steven K Schmitt; Edward F Hendershot; Paul D Holtom; Paul M Huddleston; Gregory W Petermann; Douglas R Osmon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 9.079