| Literature DB >> 35906584 |
Yanling Li1, Xiancong Wu2, Jihong Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Internet search volume reflects the level of Internet users' risk perception during public health events. The Internet search volume index model, an algorithm of concentration of Internet users, and statistical analysis of popular topics on Weibo are used to analyze the effects of time, space, and space-time interaction. We conducted in-depth research on the characteristics of the spatial and temporal distribution of Internet users' risk perceptions of public health events and the associated influential factors.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Internet search; Linear regression model; Risk perception; Space-time distribution
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35906584 PMCID: PMC9336523 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13852-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Variable definitions and relationship hypotheses
| Variable types and names | Definition of variables (quantitative units or symbols) | Relationship Hypothesesa |
|---|---|---|
| Explained variables: | ||
| Internet search volume density | The proportion of information demand of Internet users in each province to the total information demand of Internet users nationwide (%) | |
| Explanatory variables: | ||
| Male to female sex ratio ( | Male share of total population (%) | Higher risk perception among men (+) |
| Age structure ( | Population aged 15–64 as a percentage of total population (%)b | The higher the ratio, the higher the risk perception (+) |
| Years of education per capita ( | Years of formal education only (Years) | The longer the number of years of education, the higher the risk perception (+) |
| Mortality ( | Ratio of the number of deaths by province in a year to the average number for the same period (%) | The higher the mortality rate (lower the regional health level), the lower the risk perception (−) |
| Per capita GDP ( | Final results of production activities of all resident units in the provinces during the year (billion yuan, RMB) | Higher risk perception in provinces with higher GDP (economically developed areas) |
| Rate of decline in risk perception ( | The probability of Internet users searching for the COVID-19 event reflects the extent of Internet information disclosure | The higher the search volume, i.e., the faster the rate of decline, the higher the risk perception (+) |
aIn the relationship hypotheses, “+” indicates the explanatory variables have a positive correlation with the explained variables, and “-” indicates a negative correlation
bThis paper defines Internet users aged 15–64 as Internet users with sanity. According to this definition, the search volume of Internet users collected in this paper may have a small systemic error
Fig. 1Trends of internet users’ perception and epidemic changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends in risk perception and offline epidemic among netizens in the 8 weeks after the COVID-19 event in Wuhan. The time duration in the above figure is within 8 weeks after the “city closing” in Wuhan
Fig. 2Trend in daily risk perception of netizens after the COVID-19 event in Wuhan. The time duration shown is only 8 weeks (56 days) to emphasize the daily change in the density of Internet users’ search after the “city closing” in Wuhan
Descriptive statistics of internet search density on COVID-19 events after “CC” in Wuhan
| Observation time | Internet users network search volume density/province name | Descriptive statistics results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max | Min | Mean | Range | Standard deviation | |
| Total national two-month period (8 weeks in total) | |||||
| Internet search volume density ( | Beijing | Xinjiang | 5.2 | 8.83 | 1.71 |
| 7.84% | 1.98% | ||||
| Number of new confirmed cases (persons) | Guangdong | Qinghai | 431.62 | 1278 | 392.76 |
| 1295 | 17 | ||||
| The day after the outbreak (Jan 23rd) | |||||
| Internet search volume density ( | Beijing | Guangdong | 0.1366 | 0.058 | 0.34 |
| 8.85% | 0.33% | ||||
| Number of new confirmed cases (persons) | Chongqing | Shanxi, Zhejiang, Shandong, Guangdong, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Xinjiang | 3.65 | 18 | 4.85 |
| 18 | 0 | ||||
| First week after the outbreak | |||||
| Internet search volume density ( | Beijing | Xinjiang | 1.31 | 2.11 | 0.38 |
| 7.41% | 1.86% | ||||
| Number of new confirmed cases (persons) | Zhejiang | Qinghai | 119.76 | 487 | 120.45 |
| 494 | 7 | ||||
| Week 2 after the outbreak | |||||
| Internet search volume density ( | Beijing | Xinjiang | 1 | 1.75 | 0.31 |
| 8.04% | 2.02% | ||||
| Number of new confirmed cases (persons) | Guangdong | Qinghai | 176.07 | 615 | 174.52 |
| 625 | 10 | ||||
| Week 5 after the outbreak | |||||
| Internet search volume density ( | Beijing | Guangxi | 0.43 | 0.78 | 0.16 |
| 8.44% | 2.21% | ||||
| Number of new confirmed cases (persons) | Guangdong | Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Hainan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Xinjiang | 3.52 | 15 | 4.61 |
| 15 | 0 | ||||
| Week 8 after the outbreak | |||||
| Internet search volume density ( | Beijing | Xinjiang | 0.23 | 0.51 | 0.11 |
| 9.34% | 1.83% | ||||
| Number of new confirmed cases (persons) | Beijing | Hebei, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jilin, Jiangsu, Anhui, Fujian, Jiangxi, Henan, Hunan, Hainan, Chongqing, Guizhou, Qinghai, Ningxia, Xinjiang | 4.69 | 49 | 11.76 |
| 49 | 0 | ||||
The data of the first week after the “city closing” of Wuhan is the average data of seven days in that week, and so on; The number of new confirmed cases in a week is the sum of the number of new confirmed cases per day in that week; The mean, range, and standard deviation in the descriptive statistical results refer to the statistical results of the national provinces with provinces as samples; We excluded the data of Hubei Province and Tibet Autonomous Region and did not include them in the comparison of provinces throughout the country
Calculation results of partition statistics of RIi values
| Jan 23 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 5 | Week 8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New confirmed cases (persons) | Weekly | New confirmed cases (persons) | Weekly | New confirmed cases (persons) | Weekly | New confirmed cases (persons) | Weekly | New confirmed cases (persons) | |
| > = 7.5% Risk Perception Level I | |||||||||
| Beijing | 12 | Beijing | 160 | Beijing | 14 | Beijing | 49 | ||
| 5% ~ 7.5% Risk Perception Level II | |||||||||
| Shanghai | 4 | Beijing | 103 | Shanghai | 3 | Shanghai | 25 | ||
| Zhejiang | 7 | ||||||||
| 2.5% ~ 5% Risk Perception Level III | |||||||||
| Zhejiang | 0 | Zhejiang | 494 | Shanghai | 141 | Zhejiang | 2 | Guangdong | 37 |
| Hainan | 4 | Shandong | 154 | Zhejiang | 469 | Guangdong | 15 | Tianjin | 1 |
| Jiangsu | 8 | Liaoning | 41 | Tianjin | 48 | Chongqing | 9 | Hainan | 0 |
| Chongqing | 18 | Shanghai | 108 | Shandong | 201 | Jiangsu | 0 | Jiangsu | 0 |
| Shandong | 0 | Jiangsu | 159 | Liaoning | 39 | Tianjin | 5 | Chongqing | 0 |
| Fujian | 3 | Hebei | 80 | Hebei | 89 | Shandong | 8 | Fujian | 0 |
| Shaanxi | 0 | Chongqing | 179 | Jiangsu | 240 | Sichuan | 13 | Qinghai | 0 |
| Sichuan | 10 | Tianjin | 26 | Jilin | 51 | Hebei | 5 | Liaoning | 0 |
| Anhui | 6 | Anhui | 222 | Chongqing | 205 | Hainan | 0 | Shandong | 2 |
| Hebei | 1 | Hainan | 41 | Ningxia | 22 | Fujian | 3 | Sichuan | 2 |
| Tianjin | 1 | Sichuan | 163 | Qinghai | 10 | Liaoning | 0 | Hebei | 0 |
| Jiangxi | 4 | Jiangxi | 233 | Sichuan | 167 | Jilin | 2 | Ningxia | 0 |
| Liaoning | 2 | Qinghai | 7 | Hainan | 62 | Ningxia | 1 | Jilin | 0 |
| Hunan | 15 | Jilin | 11 | Anhui | 428 | Qinghai | 0 | Guizhou | 0 |
| Shanxi | 0 | Fujian | 114 | InnerMongolia | 28 | Anhui | 2 | Shaanxi | 1 |
| Henan | 4 | InnerMongoli | 14 | Guangdong | 625 | InnerMongolia | 0 | Jiangxi | 0 |
| Qinghai | 0 | Guangdong | 295 | Jiangxi | 423 | Gansu | 0 | Heilongjiang | 2 |
| Heilongjiang | 2 | Shanxi | 38 | Guizhou | 62 | Shanxi | 1 | InnerMongolia | 0 |
| Guizhou | 0 | Ningxia | 19 | Shanxi | 57 | Guizhou | 0 | Shanxi | 0 |
| Gansu | 0 | Shaanxi | 60 | Shaanxi | 111 | Jiangxi | 1 | ||
| InnerMongolia | 1 | Hunan | 308 | Fujian | 104 | Henan | 5 | ||
| Jilin | 2 | Heilongjiang | 55 | Heilongjiang | 218 | Hunan | 6 | ||
| Guizhou | 12 | Henan | 513 | Heilongjiang | 1 | ||||
| Gansu | 27 | Hunan | 440 | Shaanxi | 0 | ||||
| Gansu | 33 | ||||||||
| 0 ~ 2.5% Risk perception level IV | |||||||||
| Xinjiang | 0 | Henan | 343 | Yunnan | 53 | Xinjiang | 0 | Henan | 0 |
| Ningxia | 1 | Yunnan | 78 | Guangxi | 85 | Yunnan | 0 | Hunan | 0 |
| Guangxi | 8 | Guangxi | 74 | Xinjiang | 22 | Guangxi | 0 | Guangxi | 1 |
| Yunnan | 0 | Xinjiang | 15 | Gansu | 7 | ||||
| Guangdong | 0 | Yunnan | 2 | ||||||
| Anhui | 0 | ||||||||
| Xinjiang | 0 | ||||||||
RIi values are listed in order of magnitude by province within the same interval. The weekly RIi mean value refers to the weighted average of that week. New confirmed cases refer to the cumulative number of cases in that week
Topics of COVID-19 event that netizens were concerned about after the “city closing” in Wuhan
| Topics | Week | Public opinion ranking | Total public opinions (million times) | Public opinion categories | Topics | Week | Public opinion ranking | Total public opinions (million times) | Public opinion categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuanghuanglian inhibits 2019-nCoV | 2 | 1 | 2220.555 | 1 | CCTV reporter visited the Wuhan Red Cross | 2 | 5 | 850.335 | 1 | |
| Dr. Li Wenliang dies | 3 | 1 | 2011.394 | 1 | Large number of 2019-nCoV present in South China seafood market | 1 | 3 | 830.144 | 1 | |
| Epidemiologist says epidemic cannot wait | 1 | 1 | 1640.293 | 2 | Zhang Wenhong predicts eventual development of new coronavirus | 6 | 2 | 820.116 | 2 | |
| The epidemic is still spreading | 1 | 2 | 1590.255 | 1 | Experts advise teachers to wear masks after school starts | 5 | 1 | 810.076 | 2 | |
| Many places clarify school start time | 8 | 1 | 1550.123 | 1 | Zhang Wenhong said the epidemic is basically impossible to end this summer | 8 | 2 | 800.085 | 2 | |
| Hubei deputy governor responds to Wuhan residents’ online requests for help | 2 | 2 | 1440.396 | 1 | Children of front-line volunteers in Hubei added 10 points for admission to the high school entrance examination | 4 | 4 | 780.079 | 1 | |
| New pneumonia help channel opens | 2 | 3 | 1304.721 | 1 | Zhong Nanshan talks about specific antiviral drugs | 2 | 6 | 770.06 | 2 | |
| Wuhan will be held accountable for finding home-diagnosed patients | 4 | 1 | 1180.052 | 1 | Trump declares national emergency in response to epidemic | 8 | 3 | 750.051 | 3 | |
| 16 provinces a province package a city to support Hubei | 3 | 2 | 1120.192 | 1 | Trump praises China’s epidemic prevention and control achievements | 8 | 6 | 680.061 | 3 | |
| Zhong Nanshan talks about the peak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic | 4 | 2 | 1020.082 | 2 | South Korea confirms for the first time that Xintiandi believers have been to Wuhan | 6 | 7 | 680.023 | 3 | |
| Change in responsibilities of main comrade of Hubei provincial party | 3 | 3 | 970.113 | 1 | Zhong Nanshan says end of epidemic is to be expected in June | 7 | 3 | 590.024 | 2 | |
| Italian residents refuse to wear masks | 6 | 1 | 960.099 | 3 | Italy’s mask supply goes missing after being withheld by Germany | 8 | 10 | 570.018 | 3 | |
| The first person to report the epidemic is lauded by Hubei Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security and Hubei Provincial Health Commission. | 2 | 4 | 870.08 | 1 | Zhong Nanshan says foreign epidemic much like early Wuhan situation | 7 | 6 | 546.014 | 2 | |
| Autopsy of the body of the first patient who died from COVID-19 in China | 4 | 3 | 860.077 | 1 | Congressional physicians predict nearly half of Americans could be infected | 7 | 9 | 520.014 | 3 | |
Only topics with total public opinion of 500 million or more are counted
Simulated goodness of Internet users’ risk perception index of COVID-19 city closing in Wuhan
| Wuhan “city closing” day | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 5 | Week 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λ | 0.153 | 0.337 | 0.315 | 0.169 | 0.034 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.831 | 0.875 | 0.903 | 0.914 | 0.922 |
Linear Regression Model Analysis of Internet Users’ Risk Perceptions in the COVID-19 Event
| Variable | Equation I | Equation II | Equation III | Equation IV | Equation V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.00135 (0.613959) | 3.77E-02a (1.991287) | 0.006534 (0.83375) | 1.71E-03 (1.64111) | 0.001736 (1.86153) |
| X2 | 0.060085 (1.486521) | 0.001965 (1.825641) | 7.66E-04 (1.852471) | 1.003657a (2.663358) | 0.904527 (1.375526) |
| X3 | 8.257481b (2.307547) | 1.10E-06a (2.085241) | -0.82E-03 (−1.754117) | 0.066856a (2.15417) | 1.021367a (2.875502) |
| X4 | -1.214574a (−1.985114) | -1.70063b (−2.425471) | -1.004772a (−2.036574) | −0.001845 (−1.00036) | 4.54E-05b (2.000067) |
| X5 | 6.85E-02b (4.195523) | 3.345E-02c (5.145672) | 2.87E-05c (4.837169) | 1.66E-04b (2.105878) | 1.37E-05a (2.052741) |
| X6 | 1.978421b (2.854632) | 1.003527c (3.745811) | 1.643589b (2.107952) | 0.000275 (1.795422) | 1.087235a (2.111253) |
| Adjusted -squared | 0.685411 | 0.073251 | 0.453375 | 0.268742 | 0.204685 |
| F-statistic | 10.852311c | 3.114785b | 2.728768a | 5.416758c | 3.000256b |
a, b, c in the table indicate statistically significant at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively