| Literature DB >> 35906560 |
Zengmeng Wang1, Chunhui Peng1, Dongyang Wu1, Kai Wang1, Jiatong Xu2, Jihang Sun3, Wenbo Pang1, Cailin Ding1, Yajun Chen4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Benign splenic lesions are rarely encountered. This study aimed to review the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes in a case series of 30 pediatric patients.Entities:
Keywords: Imaging; Pathology; Pediatric; Prognosis; Spleen benign lesion; Splenectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35906560 PMCID: PMC9335990 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01745-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.030
Detailed clinical information of 30 cases
| No. | Sex | Age (Mon) | Clinical presentation | Lesion size (cm) | Lesion feature | Pathology | Surgery | Addition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 72.3 | Abdominal pain | 7.0 × 6.5 × 5.5 | Focal Cystic H | CEC | O + T | |
| 2 | M | 147.5 | Hemolytic anemia with jaundice | 7.5 × 6.0 × 5.0 | Focal Solid Lo | hamartoma | O + T | |
| 3 | F | 122.1 | Abdominal pain | 5.5 × 5.0 × 5.0 | Focal Solid U + H | SANT | O + P | |
| 4 | M | 66.8 | Abdominal pain | 3.9 × 3.8 × 3.1 | Focal Cystic U + H | CEC | O + P | |
| 5 | M | 196.3 | Splenomegaly | 13.0 × 11.0 × 8.0 | Focal Cystic Lo | CEC | O + P | |
| 6 | F | 69.5 | Abdominal pain | 4.5 × 3.5 × 3.2 | Focal Solid H | SANT | O + T | |
| 7 | F | 85.2 | Abdominal pain | 4.5 × 4.5 × 4.3 | Focal Solid H | Leiomyoma | O + T | |
| 8 | M | 109.1 | Abdominal pain | 4.5 × 4.0 × 3.2 | Focal Solid Lo | SANT | O + T | |
| 9 | M | 114.3 | Abdominal pain | 7.5 × 7.5 × 7.5 | Focal Cystic H | CEC | O + T | |
| 10 | M | 93.8 | Skin petechia | 10.0 × 6.0 × 2.5 | Diffused Cystic + Solid U + H + Lo | Lymphangio-hemangiomatosis | O + T | Consumptive coagulopathy |
| 11 | M | 176.7 | No symptom | 9.2 × 8.8 × 7.7 | Focal Cystic U | CEC | O + P | Recurrent case after unroofing |
| 12 | M | 176.1 | No symptom | 17.0 × 16.0 × 13.0 | Focal Cystic U | CEC | O + P | Recurrent case after unroofing |
| 13 | M | 102.6 | No symptom | 5.1 × 4.0 × 3.4 | Focal Solid Lo | Lymphangioma | O + P | |
| 14 | F | 169.4 | Abdominal pain | 8.9 × 7.7 × 7.1 | Focal Cystic U + H | CEC | L + T | |
| 15 | M | 48.1 | Abdominal pain | 7.3 × 6.6 × 6.6 | Focal Cystic U | CEC | O + P | |
| 16 | M | 144.3 | Abdominal pain | 15.1 × 15.1 × 12.3 | Focal Cystic U + H | CEC | O + P | |
| 17 | F | 103.3 | No symptom | 7.5 × 6.8 × 5.9 | Focal Solid H | Lymphangioma | L + T | |
| 18 | F | 151.1 | Splenomegaly | 5.3 × 5.0 × 4.9 | Focal Solid H + Lo | Lymphangioma | O + P | |
| 19 | M | 144.7 | Abdominal pain | 6.6 × 6.5 × 5.4 | Multifocal Cystic + Solid U | CEC + hemangioma | O + P | Simultaneous separate CEC and hemangioma |
| 20 | F | 28.6 | Splenomegaly | 16.0 × 10.0 × 5.0 | Diffused Solid U + H + Lo | Lymphangiomatosis | O + T | |
| 21 | F | 149.4 | Abdominal pain | 8.0 × 7.6 × 6.4 | Multifocal Cystic U + H | CEC | O + T | Recurrent case after unroofing |
| 22 | M | 79.3 | No symptom | 8.1 × 7.7 × 7.3 | Focal Cystic U | CEC | O + T | |
| 23 | F | 97.8 | Splenomegaly | 22.4 × 13.6 × 6.9 | Focal Cystic H | Lymphangioma | O + T | Involving omentum at splenic hilum |
| 24 | M | 130.4 | Abdominal pain | 10.7 × 10.4 × 5.7 | Focal Cystic U + H | CEC | O + T | |
| 25 | F | 56.7 | Skin petechia | 20.0 × 15.0 × 8.0 | Diffused Solid U + H + Lo | Lymphangio-hemangiomatosis | O + T | Consumptive coagulopathy |
| 26 | M | 144.7 | Splenomegaly | 19.9 × 17.4 × 15.1 | Focal Cystic U | CEC | L + P | Postoperative focal spleen infarction |
| 27 | M | 151.4 | Splenomegaly | 15.1 × 13.9 × 8.0 | Multifocal Cystic U + H + Lo | CEC | L + T | |
| 28 | M | 96.1 | Abdominal pain | 12.9 × 10.4 × 9.5 | Multifocal Cystic U + H + Lo | CEC | O + T | simultaneous omental mesothelial cyst |
| 29 | F | 179.5 | Abdominal pain | 18.5 × 15.3 × 13.4 | Focal Cystic U + H | CEC | L + P | |
| 30 | F | 83.7 | Abdominal pain | 6.2 × 4.9 × 4.4 | Focal Solid U | Lymphangioma | L + P | focal endothelial papillary projections |
M male, F female, U upper pole, H hilum, Lo lower pole, CEC congenital epithelial cyst, SANT sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation, O open, L laparoscopic, T total splenectomy, P partial splenectomy
Fig. 1Splenic CECs (“*” marks the cysts). A A recurrent cyst after unroofing (Case 21). B The cyst compressing left renal and renal artery (Case 26). C Stratified squamous epithelium (HE staining). D Simultaneous separate CEC and hemagioma (white arrow shows the enhanced hemangioma, Case 19). E Cytokeratin immunohistochemical staining labels the epithelium. F Simultaneous separate CEC and omentum mesothelial cyst (white triangle shows the omentum mesothelial cyst, Case 28)
Fig. 2Splenic vascular malformations. A CT of splenic diffused lymphangiohemangiomatosis (white arrow shows the accessory spleen involved, Case 25). B Intraoperative picture of Case 25. C MRI of splenic diffused lymphangiomatosis (Case 20). D Intraoperative picture of Case 20. E HE staining of Case 25 shows lymphatic malformation space filled with eosinophilic amorphous proteinaceous fluid (black arrow) and capillary malformation space filled with blood (hollow arrow). F D2-40 immunohistochemical staining of Case 20 labels lymphatic endothelium
Fig. 3Imaging pictures (contrast CT) with corresponding pathology pictures (HE staining) of splenic focal lymphatic malformation, SANT, and splenic hamartoma. A, B Splenic focal lymphatic malformation (Case 30, black arrow shows focal endothelial papillary projections). C, D: SANT (Case 3, CT shows a typical “spoke-wheel” sign). E, F: Splenic hamartoma (Case 2, CT shows a heterogeneously enhanced hypodense mass)
Adjusted and unadjusted means and variability of 7-day postoperative platelet level in total and partial splenectomy patients with preoperative platelet level as a covariate
| Group | N | Unadjusted (× 109/L) | Adjusted* (× 109/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SE | ||
| Total splenectomy | 15 | 694.0 | 266.7 | 694.4 | 58.7 |
| Partial splenectomy | 15 | 402.8 | 158.3 | 402.4 | 58.7 |
N number of patients, SD standard deviation, SE standard error
*F = 11.97, P = 0.002