| Literature DB >> 35906332 |
Emilia Ruggiero1, Augusto Di Castelnuovo2, Simona Costanzo1, Simona Esposito1, Amalia De Curtis1, Mariarosaria Persichillo1, Chiara Cerletti1, Maria Benedetta Donati1, Giovanni de Gaetano1, Licia Iacoviello3,4, Marialaura Bonaccio1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35906332 PMCID: PMC9336117 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-022-01185-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0954-3007 Impact factor: 4.884
Dietary intake and cardiovascular risk factors at baseline, during follow-up and change over 12.7 years.
| Moli-sani Study ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (2005–2010) | Follow-up (2017–2010) | 12.7 years change | ||
| Means (SD) | Means (SD) | Means (SD) | ||
| Energy intake (Kcal/d) | 2156.7 (572.0) | 1781.6 (458.9) | −375.2 (578.0) | <0.0001 |
| Carbohydrate (% energy intake) | 48.9 (6.8) | 47.1 (6.6) | −1.8 (7.9) | <0.0001 |
| Proteins (% energy intake) | 16.1 (2.1) | 14.3 (4.5) | −1.8 (4.3) | <0.0001 |
| Total fats (% of total energy) | 33.1 (5.6) | 34.9 (5.3) | 1.8 (6.1) | <0.0001 |
| SFA (% of total energy) | 11.8 (2.6) | 12.5 (2.5) | 0.6 (2.9) | <0.0001 |
| MUFA (% of total energy) | 15.9 (3.0) | 16.4 (2.7) | 0.5 (3.3) | <0.0001 |
| PUFA (% of total energy) | 3.5 (0.6) | 3.9 (0.7) | 0.4 (0.8) | <0.0001 |
| MUFA-to-SFA ratio | 1.38 (0.30) | 1.35 (0.25) | −0.04 (0.32) | <0.0001 |
| Fibre (g/d) | 22.0 (7.0) | 18.4 (4.9) | −3.5 (7.4) | <0.0001 |
| Total polyphenol intake (mg/d) | 701.8 (264.6) | 564.3 (215.6) | −137.5 (258.5) | 0.0014 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 141.0 (19.6) | 136.7 (17.1) | −4.3 (18.2) | <0.0001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 83.6 (9.5) | 81.6 (8.9) | −2.0 (9.8) | <0.0001 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 66.1 (9.5) | 65.6 (10.0) | −0.6 (9.7) | <0.0001 |
| Serum cholesterol (mg/dL) | 213.6 (38.0) | 206.2 (41.6) | −7.4 (45.8) | <0.0001 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 58.0 (14.3) | 60.2 (14.0) | 2.3 (10.7) | 0.0076 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 123.9 (63.7) | 127.5 (60.4) | 3.6 (63.6) | 0.16 |
| Blood glucose (mg/dL) | 99.0 (19.8) | 109.3 (25.0) | 10.2 (23.4) | 0.020 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.4 (4.3) | 28.2 (4.7) | 0.8 (2.5) | 0.24 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.92 (0.07) | 0.99 (0.05) | 0.07 (0.06) | <0.0001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.80 (0.19) | 0.88 (0.24) | 0.07 (0.21) | 0.013 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 2.3 (3.0) | 2.9 (4.3) | 0.6 (4.4) | 0.45 |
| White blood cells (x109/L) | 6.1 (2.1) | 5.7 (1.6) | −0.3 (2.0) | <0.0001 |
| Granulocyte to lymphocyte ratio | 1.97 (1.57) | 2.07 (0.89) | 0.10 (1.65) | <0.0001 |
| CVD risk factors score | 0.01 (13.8) | −0.05 (13.6) | −0.06 (11.4) | 0.029 |
BMI Body mass index, CVD Cardiovascular disease, SFA Saturated fats, MUFA Monounsaturated fats, PUFA Polyunsaturated fats.
P-value for changes in dietary factors were obtained from a general linear model adjusted for duration of follow-up, baseline energy intake and changes in energy intake, and baseline consumption of each dietary factor.
P-value for changes in CVD risk factors and the CVD risk score were obtained from a general linear model adjusted for duration of follow-up and baseline levels of each risk factor or cardiovascular risk score.
Characteristics of the study participants at baseline and change over 12.7 years.
| Baseline (2005–2010) | Follow-up (2017–2020) | 12.7 years change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N of subjects (%) | 2023 (100.0) | - | |
| Women | 55.7 | - | |
| Age (y; means, SD) | 54.5 (8.8) | 67.2 (8.7) | 12.8 (0.7) |
| Educational level | |||
| Up to lower secondary | 35.8 | 35.4 | −0.4 |
| Upper secondary | 44.0 | 43.4 | −0.6 |
| Postsecondary | 20.2 | 21.0 | 0.8 |
| Missing data | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Housing | |||
| Rent | 8.1 | 6.3 | −1.8 |
| 1 dwelling ownership | 74.5 | 68.3 | −6.2 |
| >1 dwelling ownership | 17.2 | 25.0 | 7.8 |
| Missing data | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Occupational class | |||
| Professional/Managerial | 28.8 | 27.0 | −1.8 |
| Skilled Non-Manual | 45.9 | 35.5 | −10.4 |
| Skilled Manual | 10.8 | 7.9 | −2.9 |
| Semi-Skilled/Unskilled | 10.7 | 7.5 | −3.2 |
| Unemployed/Unclassified | 3.8 | 21.8 | 18 |
| Missing data | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Marital status | |||
| Married/in couple | 89.8 | 84.5 | −5.3 |
| Separated/divorced | 2.3 | 3.0 | 0.7 |
| Unmarried | 4.0 | 3.5 | −0.5 |
| Widower | 3.8 | 9.0 | 5.2 |
| Missing data | 0.1 | 0.0 | −0.1 |
| Smoking status | |||
| Non-smoker | 47.1 | 50.0 | 2.9 |
| Smoker | 23.0 | 13.3 | −9.7 |
| Former | 29.7 | 36.7 | 7.0 |
| Missing data | 0.2 | 0.0 | - |
| Physical exercise at baseline (MET-h/d) | 42.2 (7.7) | 40.8 (4.0) | −1.4 (7.9) |
| Cardiovascular disease | 2.3 | 8.3 | 6.0 |
| Cancer | 3.0 | 9.4 | 6.4 |
| Diabetes | 3.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Hypertension | 22.5 | 49.4 | 26.9 |
| Dyslipidaemia | 6.0 | 22.3 | 16.3 |
Values are percentages, unless otherwise indicated.
Changes in the composite score of cardiovascular disease risk factors (1 SD-increment) associated with changes in the consumption of total fat, fat subtypes, fibre and polyphenols (1 SD-increment) over 12.7 years follow-up in the Moli-sani Study cohort (n = 2023).
| Δ Cardiovascular disease risk factors score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression coefficient | Lower 95%CI | Upper 95%CI | ||
| Δ Total fat (% of energy) | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.069 | 0.019 | 0.119 | 0.007 |
| Model 2 | 0.074 | 0.021 | 0.126 | 0.006 |
| Model 3 | 0.104 | 0.030 | 0.179 | 0.006 |
| Δ MUFA (% of energy) | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.050 | −0.003 | 0.102 | 0.062 |
| Model 2 | 0.041 | −0.013 | 0.095 | 0.139 |
| Model 3 | 0.032 | −0.046 | 0.109 | 0.426 |
| Δ PUFA (% of energy) | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.023 | −0.026 | 0.072 | 0.363 |
| Model 2 | 0.019 | −0.032 | 0.070 | 0.468 |
| Model 3 | 0.012 | −0.053 | 0.077 | 0.712 |
| Δ MUFA-to-SFA | ||||
| Model 1 | −0.062 | −0.117 | −0.006 | 0.029 |
| Model 2 | −0.085 | −0.142 | −0.028 | 0.004 |
| Model 3 | −0.086 | −0.150 | −0.021 | 0.009 |
| Δ SFA (% of energy) | ||||
| Model 1 | 0.083 | 0.033 | 0.133 | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.099 | 0.047 | 0.150 | 0.0002 |
| Model 3 | 0.103 | 0.034 | 0.172 | 0.003 |
| Δ Fibre (g/d) | ||||
| Model 1 | −0.072 | −0.105 | −0.040 | <0.0001 |
| Model 2 | −0.073 | −0.107 | −0.040 | <0.0001 |
| Model 3 | −0.051 | −0.091 | −0.012 | 0.011 |
| Δ Total polyphenols (mg/d) | ||||
| Model 1 | −0.041 | −0.101 | 0.019 | 0.18 |
| Model 2 | −0.053 | −0.115 | 0.009 | 0.096 |
| Model 3 | −0.053 | −0.124 | 0.018 | 0.15 |
Model 1: Regression coefficient β with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) obtained from the linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, duration of follow-up, baseline energy intake and changes in energy intake, baseline levels of the dietary exposure and initial levels of the score of cardiovascular disease risk factors.
Model 2: As in model 1 and further controlled for baseline marital status, educational level, housing, occupational class, history of CVD (at baseline and follow-up), history of cancer (at baseline and follow-up), diabetes (at baseline and follow-up), hypertension (at baseline and follow-up), dyslipidaemia (at baseline and follow-up), baseline physical activity and changes in physical activity, smoking status (at baseline and follow-up), baseline levels of the dietary exposure and initial levels of the score of cardiovascular disease risk factors.
Models 3 were further controlled for changes in alcohol intake (g/d), energy from carbohydrates and protein, and includes all the listed dietary variables simultaneously.
Fig. 1Changes over time in the intake of fats, fibre and polyphenols (tertiles of) associated with 1-SD change of the composite score of cardiovascular disease risk factors over 12.7 years in the Moli-sani cohort (n = 2023).
Regression coefficient β with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) obtained from the linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, duration of follow-up, baseline marital status, educational level, housing, occupational class, baseline energy intake and changes in energy intake, history of CVD (at baseline and follow-up), history of cancer (at baseline and follow-up), diabetes (at baseline and follow-up), hypertension (at baseline and follow-up), dyslipidaemia (at baseline and follow-up), baseline physical activity and changes in physical activity, smoking status (at baseline and follow-up), baseline levels of each the dietary exposure and initial levels of the score of cardiovascular disease risk factors, changes in alcohol intake (g/d), energy from carbohydrates and protein, and included all the listed dietary variables simultaneously.