Literature DB >> 35906304

Factors associated with MRI success in children cooled for neonatal encephalopathy and controls.

Kathryn Woodward1, Arthur P C Spencer1,2, Sally Jary1, Ela Chakkarapani3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if an association exists between motion artefacts on brain MRI and comprehension, co-ordination, or hyperactivity scores in children aged 6-8 years, cooled for neonatal encephalopathy (cases) and controls.
METHODS: Case children (n = 50) without cerebral palsy were matched with 43 controls for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Children underwent T1-weighted (T1w), diffusion-weighted image (DWI) brain MRI and cognitive, behavioural, and motor skills assessment. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between unsuccessful MRI and comprehension (including Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) verbal comprehension, working memory, processing speed and full-scale IQ), co-ordination (including Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC-2) balance, manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and total scores) and hyperactivity (including Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) hyperactivity and total difficulties scores).
RESULTS: Cases had lower odds of completing both T1w and DWIs (OR: 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.89). After adjusting for case-status and sex, lower MABC-2 balance score predicted unsuccessful T1w MRI (OR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, p = 0.022). Processing speed was negatively correlated with relative motion on DWI (r = -0.25, p = 0.026) and SDQ total difficulties score was lower for children with successful MRIs (p = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: Motion artefacts on brain MRI in early school-age children are related to the developmental profile. IMPACT: Children who had moderate/severe neonatal encephalopathy are less likely to have successful MRI scans than matched controls. Motion artefact on MRI is associated with lower MABC-2 balance scores in both children who received therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy and matched controls, after controlling for case-status and sex. Exclusion of children with motion artefacts on brain MRI can introduce sampling bias, which impacts the utility of neuroimaging to understand the brain-behaviour relationship in children with functional impairments.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35906304     DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-02180-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.953


  40 in total

1.  Practical aspects of conducting large-scale functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in children.

Authors:  Anna Weber Byars; Scott K Holland; Richard H Strawsburg; Wendy Bommer; R Scott Dunn; Vince J Schmithorst; Elena Plante
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Prospective motion correction of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data in children.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown; Joshua M Kuperman; Matthew Erhart; Nathan S White; J Cooper Roddey; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Eric T Han; Dan Rettmann; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The fMRI success rate of children and adolescents: typical development, epilepsy, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Benjamin E Yerys; Kathryn F Jankowski; Devon Shook; Lisa R Rosenberger; Kelly Anne Barnes; Madison M Berl; Eva K Ritzl; John Vanmeter; Chandan J Vaidya; William D Gaillard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study.

Authors:  Anastasia Yendiki; Kami Koldewyn; Sita Kakunoori; Nancy Kanwisher; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Imaging the developing brain with fMRI.

Authors:  M C Davidson; K M Thomas; B J Casey
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2003

6.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI.

Authors:  Koene R A Van Dijk; Mert R Sabuncu; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Motion-related artifacts in structural brain images revealed with independent estimates of in-scanner head motion.

Authors:  Neil K Savalia; Phillip F Agres; Micaela Y Chan; Eric J Feczko; Kristen M Kennedy; Gagan S Wig
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Inger Havsteen; Anders Ohlhues; Kristoffer H Madsen; Janus Damm Nybing; Hanne Christensen; Anders Christensen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Predicting multiscan MRI outcomes in children with neurodevelopmental conditions following MRI simulator training.

Authors:  Anish K Simhal; José O A Filho; Patricia Segura; Jessica Cloud; Eva Petkova; Richard Gallagher; F Xavier Castellanos; Stan Colcombe; Michael P Milham; Adriana Di Martino
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.811

10.  Widespread effects of dMRI data quality on diffusion measures in children.

Authors:  Nabin Koirala; Daniel Kleinman; Meaghan V Perdue; Xing Su; Martina Villa; Elena L Grigorenko; Nicole Landi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.