| Literature DB >> 35905257 |
Hao Xu1, Li Zhang2, Jin Gao3, Jiajing Wang4, Yihao Wang4, Dongdong Xiao4, Songshan Chai3.
Abstract
Glioma represents the most prevalent malignant primary brain cancer, and its treatment remains a tremendous challenge. Novel and efficient molecular targets are therefore required for improving diagnosis, survival prediction, and treatment outcomes. Additionally, some studies have shown that immunity is highly associated with glioma progression. Our study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features, prognostic significance, and immunotherapeutic targetability of ELK3, a member of the erythroblast transformation-specific transcription factor family, in glioma using bioinformatics analyses. ELK3 transcript levels in glioma tissues were evaluated using the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases. Clinical and transcriptomic data of The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma patients were analyzed to identify the molecular and clinical characterizations of ELK3. The prognostic significance of ELK3 was assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The biological pathways related to ELK3 expression were identified by gene set enrichment analysis. The relationships between ELK3 and inflammatory responses, immune cell infiltration, and immune checkpoints were explored using canonical correlation analysis and gene set variation analysis. ELK3 was upregulated in gliomas, and its high expression was correlated with advanced clinicopathologic features and unfavorable prognosis. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that several immune-related pathways were tightly linked to high ELK3 expression. gene set variation analysis and correlograms demonstrated that ELK3 was robustly associated with inflammatory and immune responses. Correlation analyses indicated that ELK3 was positively associated with infiltrating immune cells and synergistic with several immune checkpoints. ELK3 may serve as a novel marker of poor prognosis and a potential immunotherapeutic target in glioma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35905257 PMCID: PMC9333475 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1.ELK3 expression in glioma samples from the GSE50161 (A) and TCGA datasets (B); ROC curves of HLA-F expression to predict glioma in the GSE50161 (C) and TCGA datasets (D). Abbreviations: ROC = receiver operating characteristic, TCGA = The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Patient clinical characteristics.
| Characteristic | No. of patients (available data) |
|---|---|
| Median age | 52 y |
| Gender | |
| Male | 651 (58.4%) |
| Female | 460 (41.3%) |
| KPS | |
| <80 | 151 (13.6%) |
| ≥80 | 584 (52.4%) |
| IDH1 status | |
| Mutation | 91 (8.17%) |
| Wild-type | 34 (3.05%) |
| Tumor status | |
| Tumor free | 209 (18.8%) |
| With tumor | 783 (70.3%) |
| Vital status | |
| Alive | 570 (51.2%) |
| Dead | 539 (48.4%) |
| Grade | |
| II | 249 (22.4%) |
| III | 265 (23.8%) |
| IV | 596 (53.5%) |
| Histological type | |
| Oligoastrocytoma | 130 (11.7%) |
| Oligodendroglioma | 191 (17.2%) |
| Astrocytoma | 194 (17.4%) |
| GBM | 596 (53.5%) |
Figure 2.The interactions between ELK3 transcript levels and clinicopathological characteristics in TCGA dataset: age (A); gender (B); KPS (C); vital status (D); tumor status (E); histological type (F); IDH mutation (G); WHO grade (H). Abbreviations: IDH = isocitrate dehydrogenase, KPS = Karnofsky performance status, TCGA = The Cancer Genome Atlas, WHO = World Health Organization.
ELK3 expression correlated with clinicopathologic variables based on logistic regression.
| Variable | Odds ratio in ELK3 expression |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| ≥52 vs <52 | 3.07 (2.23–4.26) | |
| Gender | ||
| Male vs female | 1.16 (0.85–1.57) | .35 |
| KPS | ||
| <80 vs ≥80 | 1.56 (0.93–2.65) | .09 |
| Vital status | ||
| Dead vs alive | 3.78 (2.65–5.44) | |
| Tumor status | ||
| With tumor vs tumor free | 2.62 (1.84–3.77) | |
| Histological type | ||
| GBM vs oligoastrocytomas | 15.59 (8.63–29.49) | |
| GBM vs oligodendroglioma | 27.80 (15.63–51.93) | |
| GBM vs astrocytoma | 6.14 (3.55–11.10) | |
| IDH1 status | ||
| Wild-type vs mutation | 3.35 (1.47–8.10) | .005 |
| Grade | ||
| III vs II | 2.87 (1.98–4.19) | |
| IV vs II | 23.17 (13.43–42.00) |
Figure 3.Survival analysis of ELK3 in gliomas from TCGA dataset. Abbreviation: TCGA = The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Univariate (A) and multivariate (B) Cox regression analysis of clinical prognostic variables in TCGA dataset.
| Variable | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P |
|---|---|---|
| A | ||
| Age | 1.07 (1.05–1.08) | |
| Gender (male) | 0.98 (0.70–1.38) | .92 |
| KPS | 0.95 (0.94–0.96) | |
| Grade (IV) | 4.66 (3.48–6.25) | |
| Tumor status (with tumor) | 37.06 (5.18–265.21) | |
| Histological type (GBM) | 2.45 (2.00–3.00) | |
| ELK3 expression | 1.12 (1.09–1.15) | |
| B | ||
| Age | 1.05 (1.03–1.06) | |
| KPS | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | .004 |
| Tumor status (with tumor) | 22.07 (3.07–158.51) | .002 |
| Histological type (GBM) | 1.55 (1.27–1.90) | |
| ELK3 expression | 1.05 (1.01–1.09) | .002 |
Gene sets enriched with the high ELK3 expression phenotype.
| Gene set term | Normalized enrichment score | Nominal P-value | FDR q-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEGG_ANTIGEN_PROCESSING_AND_PRESENTATION | 2.01 | 0.0053 | |
| KEGG_B_CELL_RECEPTOR_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 1.87 | .006 | 0.0131 |
| KEGG_CYTOKINE_CYTOKINE_RECEPTOR_INTERACTION | 2.01 | 0.0049 | |
| KEGG_FC_GAMMA_R_MEDIATED_PHAGOCYTOSIS | 1.86 | .006 | 0.0124 |
| KEGG_JAK_STAT_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 1.86 | .002 | 0.0121 |
| KEGG_NATURAL_KILLER_CELL_MEDIATED_CYTOTOXICITY | 1.97 | .002 | 0.0067 |
| KEGG_PATHWAYS_IN_CANCER | 1.70 | .004 | 0.0479 |
| KEGG_T_CELL_RECEPTOR_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 1.72 | .011 | 0.0436 |
| KEGG_TOLL_LIKE_RECEPTOR_SIGNALING_PATHWAY | 1.87 | .002 | 0.0132 |
Figure 4.Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identifying biological pathways enriched in the high-ELK3 expression group.
Figure 5.ELK3-related inflammatory response: the heatmap of ELK3 related inflammatory metagenes (A); corrgram of ELK3 and these inflammatory metagenes (B).
Figure 6.Relationships between ELK3 and immune cell-specific markers (A); correlations of ELK3 with immune checkpoints (B).