Literature DB >> 35903779

Isolation of rfk-2 UV , a mutation that blocks spore killing by Neurospora Spore killer-3.

Abraham Velazquez1, Elise Webber1, Devonte O'Neil1, Thomas Hammond1, Nicholas Rhoades1.   

Abstract

Neurospora Spore killer-3 ( Sk-3 ) is a selfish genetic element that kills spores to achieve gene drive. Here, we describe the isolation and mapping of rfk-2 UV , a mutation that disrupts spore killing. The rfk-2 UV mutation is located 15.6 cM from mus-52 on Chromosome III. The significance of this discovery with respect to Sk-3 evolution is discussed. Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35903779      PMCID: PMC9315408          DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MicroPubl Biol        ISSN: 2578-9430


(A) Spore killing and gene drive are present in SkS (ISU-3037) × Sk-3 (ISU-3291) crosses. Left: Asci possess a spore killing phenotype. Asci develop asynchronously in N. crassa . Asci with dark pigmented ascospores are more mature than those with light pigmented ascospores. Right: Offspring were randomly collected and examined for Sk-3 gene drive with a PCR-based gene drive assay. All 34 offspring possess the Sk-3 genotype, demonstrating that Sk-3 gene drive occurs in this cross. Lanes: K, Sk-3 control, ISU-3291; S, SkS control, FGSC 10340; two lanes contain a DNA ladder, the remaining 34 lanes correspond to 34 offspring. (B) Spore killing and gene drive are absent from SkS (ISU-3036) × Sk-3 rfk-2 (ISU-4684) crosses. Left: Spore killing is absent from asci. Right: Of the 34 offspring examined, there are 18 with an Sk-3 genotype and 16 with an SkS genotype, demonstrating that rfk-2 disrupts gene drive (χ 2 = 0.12, p-value = 0.73). (C) The Sk-3 interval is on Chromosome III. The relative positions of the centromere, hph , hph , and mus-52 Δ are shown in the diagram. (D) Left: A three-point cross was performed with strains Sk-3 rfk-2 (ISU-4685/6) and Sk-3 mus-52 Δ (ISU-4689). Right: A total of 213 offspring were collected and genotyped for rfk-2 hph and mus-52 Δ alleles. Recombination analysis indicates that rfk-2 is located centromere-proximal of hph and mus-52 Δ. “Y” means that the indicated allele is present in a genotype. Abbreviations: SCO1, genotypes result from a crossover between rfk-2 and hph ; SCO2, genotypes result from a crossover between hph and mus-52 Δ; DCO, genotypes result from a double crossover. (E) Left: A three-point cross was performed with strains Sk-3 rfk-2 (ISU-4687/8) and Sk-3 mus-52 Δ (ISU-4689). Right: A total of 186 offspring were collected and genotyped for rfk-2 hph and mus-52 Δ alleles. Recombination analysis indicates that rfk-2 is located centromere-proximal of hph and mus-52 Δ.

Description

Spore killer-3 ( Sk-3 ) is a selfish genetic element that was discovered over four decades ago in the filamentous fungus Neurospora intermedia (Turner and Perkins 1979). Sk-3 is interesting because it is transmitted to nearly all offspring of an Sk-3 × SkS cross, where Sk-3 refers to a strain carrying the selfish genetic element, and SkS refers to a strain that is sensitive to Sk-3 -based spore killing. The biased transmission of Sk-3 is an example of gene drive that occurs through spore killing (Zanders and Johannesson 2021). Specifically, during an Sk‑3 × SkS cross, spore killing eliminates ascospores (offspring) with an SkS genotype while sparing those with an Sk‑3 genotype. As a result, Sk-3 × SkS crosses produce asci with four viable and four inviable ascospores, rather than the eight viable ascospores typical of Neurospora crosses. Sk-3 has been mapped to a 30 cM interval of Chromosome III (Turner and Perkins 1979). This interval contains hundreds of genes and it is transmitted to offspring as a single unit (Campbell and Turner 1987). At least two genes within the interval are thought to mediate gene drive. One gene is rsk, which is required for resistance to spore killing but not for spore killing itself (Hammond et al. 2012). The second gene has yet to be identified, but it is believed to encode Sk‑3 ’s killer (Hammond et al. 2012). Sk‑3 is one of two complex selfish genetic elements known to exist in Neurospora fungi. The second is Sk‑2 (Turner and Perkins 1979). Sk‑2 shares many similarities with Sk‑3 . Sk-2 is transmitted to offspring in a biased manner, resides on a similar interval of Chromosome III, and uses rsk for resistance to spore killing but not spore killing itself. Despite these similarities, Sk‑2 and Sk-3 are distinct elements. For example, Sk-2 ’s rsk allele ( rsk ) provides resistance to spore killing by Sk-2 but not Sk-3 , and Sk-3 ’s rsk allele ( rsk ) provides resistance to spore killing by Sk‑3 but not Sk-2 (Hammond et al. 2012). A recent finding suggests that some of the similarities between Sk-2 and Sk-3 , such as their complex genomic rearrangements, may have evolved by convergent evolution (Svedberg et al. 2018). Other similarities, such as the role of rsk in the drive mechanisms of both Sk-2 and Sk-3 , appear to be the result of descent from a common ancestral selfish genetic element. However, a complete understanding of the evolutionary relationship between Sk-2 and Sk-3 will likely require additional knowledge, such as the identity of Sk-3 ’s killer. The Sk-2 killer is encoded by rfk-1 and spore killing is absent in Sk‑2 rfk-1 Δ × Sk crosses (Rhoades et al. 2019). In contrast, deletion of the most likely rfk-1 ortholog from an Sk-3 strain had no effect on spore killing, leaving the identity of Sk-3’s killer unknown (Svedberg et al. 2018). Here, to help identify Sk-3 ’s killer, we performed a genetic screen for required for killing ( rfk ) mutations (see methods). The genetic screen uses Sk‑3 rsk Δ × SkS crosses, which abort development before the production of viable ascospores (Hammond et al. 2012; Harvey et al. 2014). We isolated a few candidate rfk mutations with our genetic screen and chose the most promising candidate, rfk-2 , for additional analysis. As demonstrated in Figure 1 (A and B), rfk-2 disrupts spore killing and gene drive. To determine the approximate genomic location of rfk-2 , we performed two sets of three-point crosses (Figure 1C). Recombination analysis of 213 offspring from the first set of crosses ( rfk-2 hph × mus-52 Δ) indicates that rfk-2 is located 2.8 cM from hph and 15.0 cM from mus-52 Δ (Figure 1D). For the second set of crosses ( rfk-2 hph × mus-52 Δ), recombination analysis of 186 offspring indicates that rfk-2 is located 7.5 cM from hph and 16.1 cM from mus-52 Δ (Figure 1E). In addition to providing genetic distances from physical positions on Sk-3 Chromosome III, our recombination data indicate that rfk-2 is located centromere-proximal of hph , hph , and mus‑52 Δ (Figure 1, D and E). This is somewhat surprising given that Sk-2 rfk-1 is located at the junction of Sk-2 and SkS sequences on the right arm of Chromosome III (Rhoades et al. 2019). rfk-1’s location within Sk-2 allows it to escape inactivation by a genome defense process called meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA (MSUD) (Aramayo and Selker 2013; Hammond 2017; Rhoades et al. 2019), and thus, given the importance of rfk-1 's location, we initially predicted that Sk-3 's killer gene would be found centromere-distal of hph , hph , and mus‑52 Δ. Our finding that rfk-2 is centromere-proximal to all three of these genetic markers indicates that Sk-2 and Sk-3 may have evolved different relative positions for their killer genes. In summary, the future cloning and characterization of rfk-2 should help clarify the organizational patterns of critical gene drive genes within Sk-2 and Sk-3 , as well as the evolutionary relationship between these two complex selfish genetic elements.

Methods

Strains and alleles used in this study Sk-3 was introgressed into N. crassa for genetic analysis shortly after its discovery in N. intermedia (Turner and Perkins 1979). Only N. crassa strains were used in the present study. The rid genotype suppresses a genome defense process called RIP, which mutates duplicated sequences during sexual reproduction (Freitag et al. 2002; Aramayo and Selker 2013). mus-51 Δ, and mus-52 Δ alleles suppress NHEJ, thereby increasing the efficiency of genetic transformation (Ninomiya et al. 2004). The sad-2 Δ allele inhibits MSUD, which suppresses the expression of unpaired genes during meiosis (Aramayo and Selker 2013; Hammond 2017). The his-3 and leu-1 genes are required for histidine and leucine biosynthesis, respectively, and fl controls macroconidiation (Perkins et al. 2000). Culture conditions and ascus analysis Vegetative propagation was performed on VMM/VMA and crosses were performed on SCA as previously described (Harvey et al. 2014; Rhoades et al . 2020). For imaging asci, syringe needles were used to dissect asci from perithecia into 50% glycerol at 18 days post fertilization. Asci were imaged by standard light microscopy. Screen for To isolate Sk‑3 rfk‑2 , we made one change to a previously developed screen for Sk-2 rfk mutations (Harvey et al. 2014). Specifically, we irradiated Sk‑3 rsk Δ conidia (from strain ISU-4677) instead of Sk-2 rsk Δ conidia. We then followed the protocol as previously described by fertilizing Sk protoperithecia with the UV irradiated conidia, incubating the mating cultures for four weeks, collecting shot ascospores from the lids of crossing plates, geminating ascospores on VMA, and transferring individual germlings (offspring) to culture tubes containing VMA for vegetative propagation. Each offspring was genotyped for Sk-3 and examined for an ability to kill spores in crosses with an Sk mating partner (strains F2-23, F2-26, ISU-3036, and/or ISU-3037). Offspring with an Sk-3 genotype that displayed defects in spore killing were considered rfk mutant candidates. The rfk-2 mutation was first identified in strain MAV214. The following series of crosses was used to move rfk-2 from MAV214 into strain ISU-4684: Cross 1) MAV214 × ISU-3036 = ISU-4678; Cross 2) ISU-4678 × ISU-4679 = ISU-4681; Cross 3) ISU-4681 × F2-23 = ISU-4682; Cross 4) ISU-4682 × ISU-3291 = ISU-4683; and, Cross 5) ISU-4683 × ISU-3291 = ISU-4684. Genetic modifications A standard electroporation-based transformation procedure was used to make genetic modifications to N. crassa (Margolin et al. 1997; Rhoades et al. 2020). All transformation vectors were constructed by double-joint (DJ)-PCR (Yu et al. 2004; Hammond et al. 2011), using oligonucleotide PCR primers. Sk-3 genomic DNA was used for amplification of left and right DJ-PCR fragments. The genome sequence of Sk-3 strain FGSC 3194 (Svedberg et al. 2018) was used for primer design and Chromosome III position information. Plasmid pTH1256.1 was used for amplification of hph center fragments for DJ-PCR (GenBank: MH550659.1). Plasmid pNR28.12 was used for amplification of nat center fragments for DJ-PCR (GenBank: MH553564.1). Both plasmids can be obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center (McCluskey et al. 2010). Strain ISU-3291 and transformation vectors v14b, v260, and v337 were used to create rsk Δ ::hph , leu-1 Δ ::nat , and mus-52 Δ ::nat alleles, respectively. Strain ISU-4684 and transformation vectors v322 and v324 were used to create hph and hph alleles, respectively. Primers for v14b construction: 1001b/1002b (center), 1003b/1004b (left), 1005b/1006b (right), and 1007b/1008b (nested). Primers for v260 construction: 297/298 (center), 1907/1908 (left), 1909/1910 (right), and 1911/1912 (nested). Primers for v322 construction: 585/586 (center), 2204/2158 (left), 2159/2160 (right), and 2161/2162 (nested). Primers for v324 construction: 585/586 (center), 2169/2170 (left), 2171/2172 (right), and 2173/2174 (nested). Primers for v337 construction: 297/298 (center), 2205/2214 (left), 2215/2208 (right), and 2216/2217 (nested). PCR-based assay for gene drive Genomic DNA was isolated from offspring and control strains with IBI Scientific’s mini genomic DNA kit for plants and fungi. PCR primer set 49/50 amplifies a 596 bp product from Sk-3 genotypes and an 896 bp product from SkS genotypes. PCR products were examined by standard agarose-gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining. Three-point crosses The position of rfk-2 was mapped relative to three markers: hph , hph , and mus-52 Δ. hph was created by inserting the hygromycin resistance cassette ( hph ) between genes ncu05694 and ncu05695 at approximately 1.0 Mb on Chromosome III of ISU-4684. hph was created by inserting hph between genes ncu07875 and ncu07876 at approximately 1.6 Mb on Chromosome III of ISU-4684. mus-52 Δ was created by replacing mus-52 in strain ISU-3291 with nat , a nourseothricin resistance cassette. Offspring were genotyped for hph or hph with hygromycin resistance assays, for mus-52 Δ with nourseothricin resistance assays, and for rfk-2 with spore killing assays. Strain Genotype Source F2-23 rid; fl A Hammond et al. 2012 F2-26 rid; fl a Hammond et al. 2012 F3-14 rid; fl; Sk-3 A Hammond et al. 2012 FGSC 10340 rid; mus-51 Smith et al. 2016 ISU-3036 rid; fl; sad-2 Δ ::hph A Samarajeewa et al. 2014 ISU-3037 rid; fl; sad-2 Δ ::hph a Samarajeewa et al. 2014 ISU-3291 rid; Sk-3; mus-51 Δ ::bar A P8-42 × F3-14 ISU-4677 rid; Sk-3 rsk Δ ::hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar A Trans. ISU-3291 with v14bc ISU-4678 rid; Sk-3 rsk Δ ::hph rfk-2 D ::hph a ISU-4773 × ISU-3036 ISU-4679 rid; Sk-3 leu-1 Δ ::nat-1; mus-51 Δ ::bar A Trans. ISU-3291 with v260 ISU-4681 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 D ::hph a ISU-4678 × ISU-4679 ISU-4682 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 ISU-4681 × F2-23 ISU-4683 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 ISU-4682 × ISU-3291 ISU-4684 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 Δ ::bar a ISU-4683 × ISU-3291 ISU-4685 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a Trans. ISU-4684 with v322 ISU-4686 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a Trans. ISU-4684 with v322 ISU-4687 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a Trans. ISU-4684 with v324 ISU-4688 rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a Trans. ISU-4684 with v324 ISU-4689 rid; Sk-3 mus-52 Δ ::nat; mus-51 Δ ::bar A Trans. ISU-3291 with v337 MAV214 rid; Sk-3 rsk Δ ::hph rfk-2 ISU-4677-UV × F2-26 P8-42 rid his-3; mus-51 Δ ::bar a Hammond et al. 2011 PCR Primer Number Sequence 49 CCGCTGGTTTGTGGTTCTTGATG 50 CAGCCACGGATCGCTTATCGTTT 297 GAGGGAGTGTGGGAAATGGTGTC 298 GTTGGTTAGGTGGGAACGCTTGT 585 CCGTCCACGCCCTTAATACGACT 586 CTTGATTGACAGCGAACGAAACC 1001b CTCTGCTCTTCTTTCCCCGCTCCAACTGATATTGAAGGAGCAT 1002b AACCTCGATCTCAAATGAAGCCGCAACTGGTTCCCGGTCGGCAT 1003b ATAGGGGTGAAAAAGTGGCCTTC 1004b ATGCTCCTTCAATATCAGTTGGAGCGGGGAAAGAAGAGCAGAG 1005b ATGCCGACCGGGAACCAGTTGCGGCTTCATTTGAGATCGAGGTT 1006b CCAGGCACCATCCAAGACAGTT 1007b CTGGTCGCTTTTTGCTCTGTTTTCC 1008b GTAATTCCAGGTGCCCAAGCTCA 1907 TGGGTGAATGTCTTGGGAAAGGA 1908 TGAATGCTAAAAGACACCATTTCCCACACTCCCTCGCTTCGAGGAGCTGGAATTATCAAA 1909 GCTGGCTGCAATACAAGCGTTCCCACCTAACCAACGGGCGATGCAAACAATGCTCTTT 1910 CACCTCACATCACACGCTCACCT 1911 GGACCTCGGGCAAGGATTGTAAG 1912 CTTTTCCCAAACTGCTCGCTCCT 2158 AGTCGTATTAAGGGCGTGGACGGCCGACGGATTTAGAACGAGGGC 2159 GGGTTTCGTTCGCTGTCAATCAAGTCCCCGAAGATAATACCCAAAGAGT 2160 AGTTTAGAAAACGGCGGCGGAG 2161 GGCAGAGTGGGTCCTAGCGATA 2162 AGGGTAAAATGTACGGACGAAGCT 2169 GGCGACTGTGGAATGGTAAGCG 2170 AGTCGTATTAAGGGCGTGGACGGCGTAGTGTAGGAAGCTCGGTCA 2171 GGGTTTCGTTCGCTGTCAATCAAGAGAAATGAGGCTGATAGGTAGACGT 2172 TTGACCCGACGTTCAAGATGCA 2173 TGCATTCGACTCACTTGGCATGG 2174 ACATCTTGCTGCTTCATTTCCCCT 2204 TTTCAATTTGGGAGCCGGGACTT 2205 GGGTATGTCAGGGCAAGAACGAC 2208 GCGTAATTGAGAGGCTCCCAACA 2214 TGAATGCTAAAAGACACCATTTCCCACACTCCCTCTCATTCGCGGTGGATTTCTAGGC 2215 GCTGGCTGCAATACAAGCGTTCCCACCTAACCAACTTCAAGAATGTCGAAGGCTGCCA 2216 GAGAATTGCGGGCGGGGAAGGAC 2217 GCCCCACTGTAGAGTTCACAAAGGACG

Strain

Genotype

Source

F2-23

rid; fl A

Hammond et al. 2012

F2-26

rid; fl a

Hammond et al. 2012

F3-14

rid; fl; Sk-3 A

Hammond et al. 2012

FGSC 10340

rid; mus-51 RIP70 a

Smith et al. 2016

ISU-3036

rid; fl; sad-2 Δ ::hph A

Samarajeewa et al. 2014

ISU-3037

rid; fl; sad-2 Δ ::hph a

Samarajeewa et al. 2014

ISU-3291

rid; Sk-3; mus-51 Δ ::bar A

P8-42 × F3-14

ISU-4677

rid; Sk-3 rsk Δ ::hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar A

Trans. ISU-3291 with v14bc

ISU-4678

rid; Sk-3 rsk Δ ::hph rfk-2 UV ; mus-51Δ::bar; sad-2 D ::hph a

ISU-4773 × ISU-3036

ISU-4679

rid; Sk-3 leu-1 Δ ::nat-1; mus-51 Δ ::bar A

Trans. ISU-3291 with v260

ISU-4681

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV ; mus-51Δ::bar; sad-2 D ::hph a

ISU-4678 × ISU-4679

ISU-4682

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV a

ISU-4681 × F2-23

ISU-4683

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV a

ISU-4682 × ISU-3291

ISU-4684

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV ; mus-51 Δ ::bar a

ISU-4683 × ISU-3291

ISU-4685

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV v322 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a

Trans. ISU-4684 with v322

ISU-4686

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV v322 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a

Trans. ISU-4684 with v322

ISU-4687

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV v324 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a

Trans. ISU-4684 with v324

ISU-4688

rid; Sk-3 rfk-2 UV v324 Δ:: hph; mus-51 Δ ::bar a

Trans. ISU-4684 with v324

ISU-4689

rid; Sk-3 mus-52 Δ ::nat; mus-51 Δ ::bar A

Trans. ISU-3291 with v337

MAV214

rid; Sk-3 rsk Δ ::hph rfk-2 UV ; mus-51Δ::bar a

ISU-4677-UV × F2-26

P8-42

rid his-3; mus-51 Δ ::bar a

Hammond et al. 2011

PCR Primer Number

Sequence

49

CCGCTGGTTTGTGGTTCTTGATG

50

CAGCCACGGATCGCTTATCGTTT

297

GAGGGAGTGTGGGAAATGGTGTC

298

GTTGGTTAGGTGGGAACGCTTGT

585

CCGTCCACGCCCTTAATACGACT

586

CTTGATTGACAGCGAACGAAACC

1001b

CTCTGCTCTTCTTTCCCCGCTCCAACTGATATTGAAGGAGCAT

1002b

AACCTCGATCTCAAATGAAGCCGCAACTGGTTCCCGGTCGGCAT

1003b

ATAGGGGTGAAAAAGTGGCCTTC

1004b

ATGCTCCTTCAATATCAGTTGGAGCGGGGAAAGAAGAGCAGAG

1005b

ATGCCGACCGGGAACCAGTTGCGGCTTCATTTGAGATCGAGGTT

1006b

CCAGGCACCATCCAAGACAGTT

1007b

CTGGTCGCTTTTTGCTCTGTTTTCC

1008b

GTAATTCCAGGTGCCCAAGCTCA

1907

TGGGTGAATGTCTTGGGAAAGGA

1908

TGAATGCTAAAAGACACCATTTCCCACACTCCCTCGCTTCGAGGAGCTGGAATTATCAAA

1909

GCTGGCTGCAATACAAGCGTTCCCACCTAACCAACGGGCGATGCAAACAATGCTCTTT

1910

CACCTCACATCACACGCTCACCT

1911

GGACCTCGGGCAAGGATTGTAAG

1912

CTTTTCCCAAACTGCTCGCTCCT

2158

AGTCGTATTAAGGGCGTGGACGGCCGACGGATTTAGAACGAGGGC

2159

GGGTTTCGTTCGCTGTCAATCAAGTCCCCGAAGATAATACCCAAAGAGT

2160

AGTTTAGAAAACGGCGGCGGAG

2161

GGCAGAGTGGGTCCTAGCGATA

2162

AGGGTAAAATGTACGGACGAAGCT

2169

GGCGACTGTGGAATGGTAAGCG

2170

AGTCGTATTAAGGGCGTGGACGGCGTAGTGTAGGAAGCTCGGTCA

2171

GGGTTTCGTTCGCTGTCAATCAAGAGAAATGAGGCTGATAGGTAGACGT

2172

TTGACCCGACGTTCAAGATGCA

2173

TGCATTCGACTCACTTGGCATGG

2174

ACATCTTGCTGCTTCATTTCCCCT

2204

TTTCAATTTGGGAGCCGGGACTT

2205

GGGTATGTCAGGGCAAGAACGAC

2208

GCGTAATTGAGAGGCTCCCAACA

2214

TGAATGCTAAAAGACACCATTTCCCACACTCCCTCTCATTCGCGGTGGATTTCTAGGC

2215

GCTGGCTGCAATACAAGCGTTCCCACCTAACCAACTTCAAGAATGTCGAAGGCTGCCA

2216

GAGAATTGCGGGCGGGGAAGGAC

2217

GCCCCACTGTAGAGTTCACAAAGGACG

  16 in total

1.  Identification of rfk-1, a Meiotic Driver Undergoing RNA Editing in Neurospora.

Authors:  Nicholas A Rhoades; Austin M Harvey; Dilini A Samarajeewa; Jesper Svedberg; Aykhan Yusifov; Anna Abusharekh; Pennapa Manitchotpisit; Daren W Brown; Kevin J Sharp; David G Rehard; Joshua Peters; Xavier Ostolaza-Maldonado; Jackson Stephenson; Patrick K T Shiu; Hanna Johannesson; Thomas M Hammond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Efficient detection of unpaired DNA requires a member of the rad54-like family of homologous recombination proteins.

Authors:  Dilini A Samarajeewa; Pegan A Sauls; Kevin J Sharp; Zachary J Smith; Hua Xiao; Katie M Groskreutz; Tyler L Malone; Erin C Boone; Kevin A Edwards; Patrick K T Shiu; Erik D Larson; Thomas M Hammond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Sixteen Years of Meiotic Silencing by Unpaired DNA.

Authors:  T M Hammond
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 1.944

4.  Spore killer, a chromosomal factor in neurospora that kills meiotic products not containing it.

Authors:  B C Turner; D D Perkins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Fungal Genetics Stock Center: a repository for 50 years of fungal genetics research.

Authors:  K McCluskey; A Wiest; M Plamann
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Molecular dissection of Neurospora Spore killer meiotic drive elements.

Authors:  Thomas M Hammond; David G Rehard; Hua Xiao; Patrick K T Shiu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Molecular Mechanisms and Evolutionary Consequences of Spore Killers in Ascomycetes.

Authors:  Sarah Zanders; Hanna Johannesson
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 13.044

8.  Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining.

Authors:  Yuuko Ninomiya; Keiichiro Suzuki; Chizu Ishii; Hirokazu Inoue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Neurospora crassa, a model system for epigenetics research.

Authors:  Rodolfo Aramayo; Eric U Selker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  Convergent evolution of complex genomic rearrangements in two fungal meiotic drive elements.

Authors:  Jesper Svedberg; Sara Hosseini; Jun Chen; Aaron A Vogan; Iva Mozgova; Lars Hennig; Pennapa Manitchotpisit; Anna Abusharekh; Thomas M Hammond; Martin Lascoux; Hanna Johannesson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.