| Literature DB >> 35903551 |
Fu-Sheng Chou1,2, Chu-Yen Chen1, An-Chun Lee1, Pei-Shan Wang1.
Abstract
Individuals with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are at an increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. Fetal cortical neurogenesis is a time-sensitive process in which fetal neural stem cells (NSCs) follow a distinct pattern of layer-specific neuron generation to populate the cerebral cortex. Here, we used a murine maternal hypoxia-induced IUGR model to study the impact of IUGR on fetal NSC development. In this model, timed-pregnant mice were exposed to hypoxia during the active stage of neurogenesis, followed by fetal brain collection and analysis. In the IUGR fetal brains, we found a significant reduction in cerebral cortical thickness accompanied by decreases in layer-specific neurons. Using EdU labeling, we demonstrated that cell cycle progression of fetal NSCs was delayed, primarily observed in the G2/M phase during inward interkinetic nuclear migration. Following relief from maternal hypoxia exposure, the remaining fetal NSCs re-established their neurogenic ability and resumed production of layer-specific neurons. Surprisingly, the newly generated neurons matched their control counterparts in layer-specific marker expression, suggesting preservation of the fetal NSC temporal identity despite IUGR effects. As expected, the absolute number of neurons generated in the IUGR group remained lower compared to that in the control group due to a reduced fetal NSC pool size as a result of cell cycle defect. Transcriptome analysis identified genes related to energy expenditure and G2/M cell cycle progression being affected by maternal hypoxia-induced IUGR. Taken together, maternal hypoxia-induced IUGR is associated with a defect in cell cycle progression of fetal NSCs, and has a long-term impact on offspring cognitive development.Entities:
Keywords: cell cycle; cerebral cortex; fetal neural stem cell; intrauterine growth restriction; self-renewal
Year: 2022 PMID: 35903551 PMCID: PMC9314876 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.821848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Decreased cortical neurogenesis in the intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) mouse fetal brain. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (B) Immunofluorescence staining showing Ctip2-, Satb2-, and Brn2-positive cells in the cortical plate (CP), immediate zone (IZ), and ventricular zone (VZ) in the control and the IUGR groups. (C) Immunofluorescence staining showing Pax6- and Tbr2-positive cells in the VZ in the control and IUGR groups. The tissue sections were counterstained with DAPI (not shown) to visualize all cells in a given tissue section. (D) Quantification of the densities of cells expressing the indicated markers as shown in Panel B. (E) Quantification of the densities of cells expressing the indicated markers as shown in Panel C.
FIGURE 2Delayed cortical neurogenesis and decreased number of fetal NSCs in the intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) mouse fetal brain. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (B) Immunofluorescence staining showing cells co-expressing EdU and Ctip2, Satb2, or Brn2 markers in the control and the IUGR groups. (C) Quantification of the cells in Panel B showing the proportion (shown in percentage) of EdU/lineage marker-co-expressing cell density to total EdU-expressing cell density per view. (D) Immunofluorescence staining showing cells co-expressing EdU and Pax6 at the indicated time points in the control and the IUGR groups. (E) Quantification of the cells in panel D showing the proportion (shown in percentage) of EdU/Pax6-co-expressing cell density to total EdU-expressing cell density per view.
FIGURE 3Delayed cell cycle progression of fetal neural stem/progenitor cells in the intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) mouse fetal brain. (A) Schematic representation of the coupling of interkinetic nuclear migration and cell cycle stages. (B) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (C) EdU staining at indicated time points. Horizontal lines represent boundaries of the bins used for quantification in panels D–F. (D,E) Quantifications of the cells in panel C showing the proportion (shown as percentage) of bin-specific EdU (+) cell density to total EdU (+) cell density per view. Note that the bars in the control group for the 27 h plot are the same as those in the 24 h plot. (F) Modeling of the distance between the nuclei to the ventricular lining over time in the control and the IUGR group.
FIGURE 4Gestational time-corresponding layer-specific neuron production was resumed following relief from maternal hypoxia exposure. (A) Schematic representation of experimental design. Note that brains were harvested on embryonic day (E)17.5. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of EdU in the control (n = 6) and IUGR (n = 6) groups. (C) Quantification of the cells in panel B showing the proportion of the region-specific EdU (+) cell density to total EdU (+) cell density per view. A two-way ANOVA test showed no significant difference between experimental groups (p = 0.25) but significant difference among brain regions (p < 0.001). (D) Schematic representation of experimental design. Note that brains were harvested on postnatal day (P) 1. (E) Immunofluorescence staining showing cells co-expressing EdU and Satb2/Brn2. (F) Quantification of the cells in panel E showing the densities of cells co-expressing EdU and indicated lineage marker.