Literature DB >> 35903516

The Utilization of Three-Dimensional Printing in Creating a Surgical Instrument: An Areola Cookie Cutter.

Waleed Burhamah1, Solaiman M Alshawaf1, Sabika Alwazzan2, Sarah AlYouha3, Salman Al-Sabah3.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a rapidly evolving technology with many applications in the medical field. It involves printing solid objects from a digital file. In this paper, we describe our experience with the use of 3D printing in creating an areola cookie cutter that is compatible with sterilization. The objective of this study is to explore accurate and cost-effective methods of producing patient-specific areola cookie cutters. Auto computer-aided design (CAD) 3D software was used to design a digital model that was subsequently converted to a standard tessellation language (STL) file. The models were printed with the Formlabs Form 3+ SLA printer (Somerville, MA) using a resin material. Washing and curing were then performed followed by autoclave sterilization of the models. A total of 3 areola cookie cutters were created, each with different sizes (33, 38, and 42 mm) using resin material (Formlabs BioMed Clear Resin; Somerville, MA). All 3 models were able to withstand autoclave sterilization. The use of 3D printing has proven to be a valuable tool in Plastic surgery. We describe our experience of designing and producing an areola cookie cutter using a 3D printer; our model is compatible with the process of sterilization. We emphasize the advantages of a quick production time and accuracy in design.
© 2022 The Aesthetic Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35903516      PMCID: PMC9317162          DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojac055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum        ISSN: 2631-4797


Three-dimensional (3D) printing, or rapid prototyping, is an additive manufacturing process that allows for the creation of solid objects from a digital file, and it is a relatively new technology that has found many applications in various fields.[1] The utilization of 3D printing in the medical field has been receiving a growing recognition; it has played a pivotal role in advancing various aspects of the field since its inception. One of its well-recognized uses is in the preoperative planning of complex cases, whereby radiological images, eg, from a computerized tomography (CT) scan, are converted into standard tessellation language (STL) in a process called “segmentation,” and this is then translated by the 3D printer into a model that can be used for planning the surgery.[1-3] This has been shown to reduce operation time.[4] Additionally, 3D printing has also been used to create prosthetics and implants, eg, orbital prosthesis, which are accustomed to patients’ specifications.[1,5,6] One of its overlooked uses is in the creation of surgical instruments. Successful attempts have been made to design, print, sterilize, and use surgical instruments.[2,7-10] In this paper, we describe our experience in designing and 3D printing an areola cookie cutter.

METHODS

Auto computer-aided design (CAD) 3D software was used to design and develop a digital model of the areola cookie cutter (Figure 1). Three different sizes (33, 38, and 42 mm) were created. The digital models were then converted to an STL file format (Figure 2) and printed using Formlabs Form 3+ SLA Printer (cost $3750US) (Figure 2). The models were printed using BioMed Clear Resin (Formlabs, Somerville, MA).[11] The designing phase lasted 2 to 3 hours, while the total printing time lasted 4 hours. Only 45 mL of resin was used in the printing process of the 3 models (1 L of resin costs $349US).
Figure 1.

A digital model of the cookie cutter in 3 sizes (33, 38, and 42 mm) created using auto computer-aided design three-dimensional (CAD 3D) software.

Figure 2.

The STL file format of the digital models of the cookie cutters. STL, standard tessellation language.

A digital model of the cookie cutter in 3 sizes (33, 38, and 42 mm) created using auto computer-aided design three-dimensional (CAD 3D) software. The STL file format of the digital models of the cookie cutters. STL, standard tessellation language. The models were then washed using 70% isopropyl alcohol for 5 minutes using the Formlabs Form Wash device (Somerville, MA). Curing was then performed using the Formlabs Form Cure device (Somerville, MA) for 60 minutes under 60 degrees, in order to reach the greatest potential strength and optimum color. Sterilization of the models was then performed using an autoclave under 121°C for 30 minutes. To ensure successful sterilization, the printed models were directly applied to a blood agar plate and a chocolate agar plate. The agar plates were then incubated at 35°C ± 2°C in oxygen and carbon dioxide environments, respectively. No bacterial growth was detected after 48 h. Additionally, Sabouraud agar was used to detect fungal growth. After 7 days of incubation, no fungal growth was detected.

RESULTS

We created a total of 3 areola cookie cutters of 3 different sizes (33, 38, and 42 mm) (Figures 3, 4). The type of resin material used was BioMed Clear resin. The models were able to withstand sterilization in an autoclave (Figure 5).
Figure 3.

The three-dimensional printed models of cookie cutters using BioMed Clear Resin material (Formslab, Somerville, MA) in 3 sizes (33, 38, and 42 mm).

Figure 4.

The three-dimensional printed cookie cutter model (size 42 mm).

Figure 5.

The three-dimensional printed models following sterilization with autoclave.

The three-dimensional printed models of cookie cutters using BioMed Clear Resin material (Formslab, Somerville, MA) in 3 sizes (33, 38, and 42 mm). The three-dimensional printed cookie cutter model (size 42 mm). The three-dimensional printed models following sterilization with autoclave.

DISCUSSION

The use of 3D printing has proven to be a valuable tool in many areas of plastic surgery. Its widespread use in surgical planning, simulation, patient education, and the customization of prosthesis has revolutionized the field.[1] Although a number of ethical implications should be taken into consideration, eg, patient consent and conflicts of interest, the benefits of 3D printing in delivering patient-specific care as well as improving patient satisfaction cannot be overlooked.[1] Despite its numerous advantages, there is paucity in the literature on the use of 3D printing to create surgical instruments.[2,7-10] Combining the qualities of a quick production time, accuracy in design, and ease of modification according to both the surgeon and patient’s preferences, the 3D printing of surgical instruments and intraoperative guides could also play a role in the provision of surgical care in low-resource areas.[12] The field of plastic surgery provides an environment that fosters creativity and improvisation, and several methods have been described in the literature as a replacement for the classical cookie cutter.[13-17] With the availability of a 3D printing facility at our hospital, we describe our successful experience in designing and printing an areola cookie cutter that is compatible with the process of sterilization. Various innovative methods have been implemented in the literature to create custom areola markers, from washer sets to wires, electrocardiography dots, and wavy line markers.[13-17] As evident by the literature, a symmetrical nipple-areola complex (NAC) plays a pivotal role in patient satisfaction.[18] As a result, the importance of accurate and symmetrical measurements of a patient’s NAC dimensions cannot be overstated, making cookie cutters superior to the previously mentioned improvisations. The commonly used cookie cutter sets are manufactured with a limited range of sizes (between 38 and 45 mm),[19] this coincides with the most common diameter of female NACs (mean of 40 mm).[20] Inevitably, this excludes a subset of patients where their desired or ideal NAC dimensions are less than what the commercially available cookie cutters provide. This includes male patients with severe gynecomastia or those undergoing female-to-male gender-affirming surgeries; in that cohort of patients, the ideal NAC dimensions are that of a male (mean areola diameter 25.9 mm).[21] In order to mark the anticipated NAC dimensions, surgeons are here left with no choice but to improvise both preoperatively during patient counseling and intraoperatively.[22] This creates room for imprecision and compromises accuracy. This dilemma can be overcome by utilizing 3D printing; the relative cost-effectiveness, quick production time, and accuracy in design allow the creation of patient-specific areola markers of various sizes. These can subsequently be used in both preoperative counseling and intraoperatively. The materials used in 3D printing vary widely; choosing a material that has been cross-tested for clinical use is paramount. In our experience, we have decided upon this type of resin material due to its biocompatibility and compliance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards, as it is successfully tested in terms of cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5), irritation and sensitization (ISO 10993-10), as well as mutagenicity (ISO 10993-3), which proves it is suitable for extended skin and mucosal contact.[23] In addition, BioMed Clear Resin is ISO 13485 certified and is included in an American FDA Device Master File.[24] Furthermore, the design can be extrapolated to other materials, which have been previously used for the production of surgical instruments (eg, poly-lactic acid).[7-9,25]

CONCLUSIONS

Alongside its numerous applications, in this report, we highlight the role of 3D printing in successfully creating a surgical instrument. The quick production time and accuracy of the printing process are worthy of note. Despite the multiple advantages, unlimited capabilities, and invaluable contribution of 3D printing to the field of medicine, further studies are required to ascertain the long-term safety, precision, and cost-effectiveness of the 3D-printed surgical instruments against commercially available instruments.
  18 in total

1.  The electrocardiography dot as a preoperative marker for nipple-areola complex reconstruction.

Authors:  A L Mahajan; C L Riordan; A J Hussey; P J Regan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  A new areola marker.

Authors:  A Aydan Köse; Yakup Karabağli; Cengiz Cetin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Useful method to create a precise, sterile, and inexpensive areola marker.

Authors:  Luciano Ariel Lanfranchi; Riccardo Gazzola; Franz Wilhelm Baruffaldi Preis
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.283

4.  Patient satisfaction following nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and tattooing.

Authors:  S C J Goh; N A Martin; A N Pandya; R I Cutress
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  The Ideal Male Nipple-Areola Complex: A Critical Review of the Literature and Discussion of Surgical Techniques for Female-to-Male Gender-Confirming Surgery.

Authors:  Marissa Maas; Anna C Howell; Daniel J Gould; Edward C Ray
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  3D Printed Surgical Instruments: The Design and Fabrication Process.

Authors:  Mitchell George; Kevin R Aroom; Harvey G Hawes; Brijesh S Gill; Joseph Love
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Defining Normal Parameters for the Male Nipple-Areola Complex: A Prospective Observational Study and Recommendations for Placement on the Chest Wall.

Authors:  Dominic Yue; Lilli R L Cooper; Ryan Kerstein; Susan C Charman; Norbert V Kang
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  A Practical Way for Nipple-Areola Complex Reshaping in Circumareolar Reduction of Gynecomastia.

Authors:  Ersin Aksam; Berrak Aksam; Mustafa Erol Demirseren
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.283

9.  Three-dimensional Printing in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Rod R Jose; Amr N Rabie; Theodore L Gerstle; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10

10.  Low-Cost Polyester-Tipped Three-Dimensionally Printed Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Authors:  Mohammad Alghounaim; Sulaiman Almazeedi; Sarah Al Youha; Jesse Papenburg; Osama Alowaish; Ghadeer AbdulHussain; Rawan Al-Shemali; Ahmad Albuloushi; Saud Alzabin; Khaled Al-Wogayan; Yousef Al-Mutawa; Salman Al-Sabah
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.