Literature DB >> 35903503

New justice system responses to mentally impaired defendants in New Zealand.

Jeremy Skipworth1,2, Warren Brookbanks3.   

Abstract

On 16 March 2020 the District Court in Auckland, New Zealand, had its first sitting as a court dedicated exclusively to cases where issues of fitness to stand trial or insanity had been raised. The impetus for these court sittings, called 'the CPMIP Court' [after the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003], was to reduce delays for mentally impaired defendants, and improve the coverage and efficiency of mental health advice to the Court from both Court Liaison Nurses and Health Assessors (Psychiatrists and Psychologists). This article looks at the model in operation and reflects on some early outcome data, as the possibility of further expansion of this model is contemplated in other regions. We also consider broader challenges currently facing mentally impaired defendants in New Zealand's criminal justice system, and argue that other innovative judicial approaches such as the establishment of problem-solving mental health courts should be considered.
© 2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  court liaison; diversion; fitness to plead; insanity; mental health court; prison; problem-solving court; remand

Year:  2021        PMID: 35903503      PMCID: PMC9318228          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  12 in total

1.  Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: a multisite study.

Authors:  Henry J Steadman; Allison Redlich; Lisa Callahan; Pamela Clark Robbins; Roumen Vesselinov
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-04

Review 2.  Severe mental illness in 33,588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Seena Fazel; Katharina Seewald
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  Mentally ill people in our prisons are suffering human rights violations.

Authors:  Erik Monasterio; Susanna Every-Palmer; Julie Norris; Jackie Short; Krishna Pillai; Peter Dean; James Foulds
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 4.  Does the evidence support the case for mental health courts? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Laura N Honegger
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2015-06-01

5.  An examination of stakeholder attitudes and understanding of therapeutic jurisprudence in a mental health court.

Authors:  Loraine Lim; Andrew Day
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-01

6.  Prospective study of violence risk reduction by a mental health court.

Authors:  Dale E McNiel; Naomi Sadeh; Kevin L Delucchi; Renée L Binder
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Deciding to participate in mental health court: Exploring participant perspectives.

Authors:  Kelli E Canada; Kathi R Trawver; Stacey Barrenger
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-04

8.  Are mental health courts target efficient?

Authors:  Nancy Wolff
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-02

9.  Mental Health and Criminal Charges: Variation in Diversion Pathways in Australia.

Authors:  Fiona Davidson; Edward Heffernan; David Greenberg; Rhondda Waterworth; Philip Burgess
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2017-06-06

10.  Enrollment in mental health courts: voluntariness, knowingness, and adjudicative competence.

Authors:  Allison D Redlich; Steven Hoover; Alicia Summers; Henry J Steadman
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2008-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.