Literature DB >> 35903502

The impact of voluntariness of apologies on victims' responses in restorative justice: findings of a quantitative study.

Alfred Allan1, Justine de Mott2, Isolde M Larkins2, Laura Turnbull3, Tracey Warwick4, Lacey Willett5, Maria M Allan1.   

Abstract

Apologies are ordered in law without certainty about whether or not recipients perceive ordered and voluntary apologies differently. This exploratory study investigates whether or not the voluntariness of apologies influences recipients' perceptions of their sincerity, acceptance of apologies, willingness to forgive and intended retributive behaviour. We manipulated the voluntariness of apologies whilst considering offender (age, gender, ethnicity and prior wrongful behaviour) and offence (seriousness) characteristics in 3 studies (ns = 164, 121, 236). Participants adopting the role of a hypothetical victim received either a voluntary or an ordered apology. The voluntary apologies were found to have a significantly more positive impact than the ordered apologies on acceptance and perception of sincerity in all 3 studies and on forgiveness in 2 studies, but did not significantly change participants' retributive behaviour in any study. Age was the only other variable found to make a significant difference, with younger offenders' apologies being rated as sincerer.
© 2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acceptance; apology; forgiveness; justice; law; restorative

Year:  2021        PMID: 35903502      PMCID: PMC9318312          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1956383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  14 in total

1.  Illness schema activation and attentional bias to coping procedures.

Authors:  Caroline J Henderson; Sheina Orbell; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 2.  The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Amanda D Angie; Shane Connelly; Ethan P Waples; Vykinta Kligyte
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-05-24

3.  Effects of victim presence and coercion in restorative justice: An experimental paradigm.

Authors:  Alana Saulnier; Diane Sivasubramaniam
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2015-04-06

4.  How voluntariness of apologies affects actual and hypothetical victims' perceptions of the offender.

Authors:  Alayna Jehle; Monica K Miller; Markus Kemmelmeier; Jonathan Maskaly
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

5.  The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content.

Authors:  Moshe Shay Ben-Haim; Paul Williams; Zachary Howard; Yaniv Mama; Ami Eidels; Daniel Algom
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Apologies in a Legal Setting: Insights from Research into Injured Parties' Experiences of Apologies after an Adverse Event.

Authors:  Alfred Allan; Robyn Carroll
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2016-06-23

7.  Target and observer differences in the acceptance of questionable apologies.

Authors:  Jane L Risen; Thomas Gilovich
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-03

8.  Neural correlates of receiving an apology and active forgiveness: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Sabrina Strang; Verena Utikal; Urs Fischbacher; Bernd Weber; Armin Falk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Are Manipulation Checks Necessary?

Authors:  David J Hauser; Phoebe C Ellsworth; Richard Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-21

10.  Forgiving, fast and slow: validity of the implicit association test for predicting differential response latencies in a transgression-recall paradigm.

Authors:  Ramzi Fatfouta; Michela Schröder-Abé; Angela Merkl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.