| Literature DB >> 35903465 |
Tongxu Cui1, Simin Lin1, Zizhen Wang1, Peng Fu1,2, Cong Wang3, Weiming Zhu1,2.
Abstract
Under the guidance of global natural product social molecular networking, three new indolocarbazoles named streptocarbazoles F-H (1-3), along with staurosporine (4) were isolated from the marine-derived Streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-5380. Structures of streptocarbazoles F-H were, respectively, determined as N-demethyl-N-hexanoylstaurosporine (1), N-demethyl-N-(2-methyl-3-methoxypyridin-4-yl) staurosporine staurosporine (2), and 4-(N-demethylstaurosporine-N-yl)-1,2-dimethyl-3-methoxypyridinium (3) by spectroscopic analysis and electronic circular dichroism comparison with staurosporine. Compared with staurosporine (4), streptocarbazoles F-H (1-3) showed a selective antiproliferation of the acute myeloid leukemia cell line MV4-11 with the IC50 values of 0.81, 0.55, and 1.88 μM, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Streptomyces sp.; antiproliferatory activity; indolocarbazoles; marine microorganism; streptocarbazoles F–H
Year: 2022 PMID: 35903465 PMCID: PMC9315148 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.957473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1Structures 1–4 and the molecular networking of the extract (MeOH layer) from Streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-5380 (a) and the compound cluster of indolocarbazole family observed in the molecular networking (b).
1H (500 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) data for compounds 1–3 in DMSO-d6.
| No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| δC, type | δH, mult. ( | δC, type | δH, mult. ( | δC, type | δH, mult. ( | |
| 1 | 108.9, CH | 7.59, | 109.1, CH | 7.64, | 109.1, CH | 7.64, |
| 2 | 125.3, CH | 7.48, overlapped | 125.5, CH | 7.49, overlapped | 125.2, CH | 7.48, overlapped |
| 3 | 119.4, CH | 7.29, | 119.7, CH | 7.29, | 119.8, CH | 7.30, |
| 4 | 125.7, CH | 9.28, | 125.7, CH | 9.24, | 125.7, CH | 9.24, |
| 4a | 122.6, C | – | 122.6, C | – | 122.6, C | – |
| 4b | 114.9, C | – | 115.1, C | – | 115.1, C | – |
| 4c | 119.6, C | – | 119.9, C | – | 119.9, C | – |
| 5 | 171.8, C | – | 171.7, C | – | 171.7, C | – |
| 6 | – | 8.63, s | – | 8.68, s | – | 8.67, s |
| 7 | 45.4, CH2 | 5.01, | 45.4, CH2 | 5.04, | 45.4, CH2 | 5.04, |
| 7a | 132.3, C | – | 132.6, C | – | 132.6, C | – |
| 7b | 114.1, C | – | 114.9, C | – | 115.0, C | – |
| 7c | 123.9, C | – | 124.3, C | – | 124.3, C | – |
| 8 | 121.3, CH | 8.05, | 121.2, CH | 8.08, | 121.3, CH | 8.08, |
| 9 | 120.4, CH | 7.36, | 120.8, CH | 7.38, | 120.9, CH | 7.39, |
| 10 | 125.1, CH | 7.48, overlapped | 125.2, CH | 7.49, overlapped | 125.5, CH | 7.48, overlapped |
| 11 | 114.3, CH | 8.05, | 115.6, CH | 8.08, | 115.6, CH | 8.08, |
| 11a | 138.9, C | – | 139.6, C | – | 139.6, C | – |
| 12a | 128.8, C | – | 125.3, C | – | 125.0, C | – |
| 12b | 125.4, C | – | 125.1, C | – | 125.0, C | – |
| 13a | 136.3, C | – | 136.7, C | – | 136.7, C | – |
| 1’ | 80.9, CH | 6.87, | 79.9, CH | 6.92, | 79.8, CH | 6.92, |
| 2’ | 29.5, CH2 | 2.41, | 30.8, CH2 | 2.96, | 30.7, CH2 | 2.95, |
| 3’ | 42.5, CH | 4.43, | 44.5, CH | 4.68, | 44.5, CH | 4.67, brs |
| 4’ | 81.2, CH | 4.13, | 79.7, CH | 4.36, | 79.6, CH | 4.38, brs |
| 4’-OCH3 | 59.1, CH3 | 2.87, s | 58.1, CH3 | 3.23, s | 58.0, CH3 | 3.26, s |
| 5’ | 92.7, C | – | 91.9, C | – | 91.9, C | – |
| 6’ | 29.0, CH3 | 2.39, s | 28.8, CH3 | 2.36, s | 28.8, CH3 | 2.36, s |
| 3’-NH | – | 6.77, | – | 5.99, brs | – | 5.98, |
| 1” | 171.9, C | – | 150.9, C | – | 149.9, C | – |
| 2” | 35.2, CH2 | 1.47, | 139.6, C | – | 140.2, C | – |
| 2”-OCH3 | 59.1, CH3 | 2.43, s | 59.4, CH3 | 2.36, s | ||
| 3” | 24.2, CH2 | 0.85, overlapped | 143.0, C | – | 145.5, C | |
| 3”-CH3 | 13.9, CH3 | 2.10, s | 12.7, CH3 | 2.11, s | ||
| 4” | 30.5, CH2 | 0.83, overlapped | ||||
| 4”-CH3 | 42.8, CH3 | 3.68, s | ||||
| 5” | 21.6, CH2 | 1.00, | 137.7, CH | 8.01, | 142.3, CH | 8.14, |
| 6” | 13.7, CH3 | 0.69, | 104.3, CH | 7.03, | 104.1, CH | 7.08, |
FIGURE 21H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations of compounds 1–3.
FIGURE 3Key NOESY correlations of compounds 1–3.
FIGURE 4Experimental ECD spectra of compounds 1–4.