| Literature DB >> 35903457 |
Xianshu Wang1,2,3, Hao Yue2, Haonan Zhang2,3, Lei Wan4, Shuxia Ji1, Chong Geng1.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the preventive effects of plant oils with different linoleic acid/alpha-linolenic acid (LA/ALA) ratios against colitis symptoms, and dysbiosis of gut microbiota in acute colitis mouse model.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; alpha-linolenic acid; colitis mouse model; gut microbiota; inflammation; linoleic acid
Year: 2022 PMID: 35903457 PMCID: PMC9315388 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.788775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1(A) Illustration of experimental design and basic indices of mice during 3 months on different diets. (B) Curve of changes in body weights. (C) Fasting blood glucose levels after 3 months feeding on different diets. Asterisk indicates a significant difference between the high-fat diet groups and low-fat diets (LF-L + LF-M + LF-H vs. HF-L + HF-M + HF-H) and circle indicates a significant difference between the HF-M and other high fat diet groups.
FIGURE 2Body physiological conditions and DAI scores. (A) Change curves of body weight and (B) DAI scores during DSS-induction. Comparison of (C) body weights and (D) DAI scores at the end of DSS-induction. Bars with the same letter indicate a non-significant difference (P > 0.05). Asterisk indicates a significant difference between the high fat diet groups and low fat diet groups; #indicates a significant difference between the mice from groups fed with the diets of different LA/ALA ratios.
FIGURE 3(A) Colon lengths of the mice. (B) Spleen weights of mice. (C) Histopathological examination and (D) evaluation of histopathological severity scores of the colon tissue. Bars with the same letter indicate a non-significant difference (P > 0.05). Asterisk indicates a significant difference between the high fat diet groups and low fat diet groups; #indicates a significant difference between the mice from groups fed with the diets of different LA/ALA ratios.
FIGURE 4(A) Bacterial richness of gut microbiota evaluated by Chao index. (B) Bacterial diversity of gut microbiota estimated by Shannon index. (C) Compositions of gut microbiota in different groups at phylum level, and (D) compositions of gut microbiota in different groups at genus level. Asterisk indicates a significant difference between the high fat diet groups and low fat diet groups.
FIGURE 5Statistical comparisons of the relative abundances of the (A) top 7 main bacterial phyla and (B) top 7 main bacterial genera in the gut microbiota of mice from the groups fed with different diets. (C) Correlations between the relative abundance of genus Escherichia Shigella and DAI scores. (D) Correlations between the relative abundance of genus Helicobacter and DAI scores. Bars with the same letter indicate a non-significant difference (P > 0.05). Asterisk indicates a significant difference between the high fat diet groups and low fat diet groups; #indicates a significant difference between the mice from groups fed with the diets of different LA/ALA ratios.