| Literature DB >> 35903281 |
Kelly A Mason1, Alan D Rogol1.
Abstract
Since cystic fibrosis (CF) was first described in 1938, there have been many discoveries and innovations in the field, each having a profound impact on survival, growth and quality of life. For example, the introduction of enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme microspheres increased fat absorption and improved nutritional status. Early detection of CF through newborn screening facilitated prompt nutritional intervention for infants at high risk of malnutrition. Use of anti-pseudomonal therapy, such as inhaled tobramycin, increased weight gain and pulmonary function in addition to reducing pulmonary exacerbations. Similarly, DNAse and hypertonic saline improved pulmonary function and reduced exacerbations. The identification of the CFTR gene and its protein product were fundamental in understanding the pathophysiology of CF and paved the way for advances in both diagnosis and management. In fact, CFTR modulator therapies have revolutionized the care for individuals with CF. Here, we examine the impact of these interventions on the nutritional status, growth and pubertal maturation of children and adolescents with CF.Entities:
Keywords: body composition; cystic fibrosis; growth; height; puberty; weight
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35903281 PMCID: PMC9317724 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.935354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Growth Data over Time.
| Authors | Year | Location | Study Details | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shwachman ( | 1958 | US | Longitudinal study over 5-14 yrs |
Malnourished: 0% to 22% Wt & ht <3%: 45% to 44% Wt & ht >25% 22% to 0% |
| Sproul ( | 1964 | US | Longitudinal study over ≥ 2 yrs |
Ht and wt <10% ▪ Wt affected > ht in young; stunting of ht & wt with age ↑ Wt after Abx and PERT (no impact on linear growth) |
| Kreiβl ( | 1972 | Germany | Longitudinal study over 1-12 yrs |
Ht 25-50% Wt affected > ht (M 25%; F 3-10%) |
| Berry ( | 1975 | US | Case-control study of ‘nutritional supplement’ |
↑ Wt to -1SD w/early dx ↓ WV > HV after 8 yrs |
| Mitchell-Heggs ( | 1976 | UK | Longitudinal study over 1.1-14.25 yrs |
Ht M 25%; F 25-50% Wt affected > ht ▪ 47% wt <3% |
| Corey ( | 1988 | US & Canada | Cross-sectional study |
Pts Toronto taller than Boston (M 42% vs. 33% p<0.001; F 44% vs 33%) M Toronto heavier than Boston Attributed to diff in dietary fat & PERT |
| Keller ( | 2003 | Switzerland | Longitudinal study for at least 11 yrs |
BMI sig ↓in young kids born earlier (p<0.047 for 2 yo; p=0.0045 for 5 yo) |
| Nir ( | 1996 | Denmark | Cross-sectional study |
Ht -0.46 SD Wt M -0.6 SD; F -0.7 SD BMI ↓ over time (98% in younger pts 83-90% in adult) |
| Farrell ( | 1997 | US | Randomized prospective longitudinal study (Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Project) |
Length/ht & wt ↑ in those dx by NBS than non-screened ▪ Ht -0.2 vs. -1.2; p<0.001 ▪ Wt -0.5 vs -1.2; p=0.008 ▪ Persists over 10 yrs (wt p=0.04; ht p=0.02) |
| Lai ( | 1998 | US | Cross-sectional study |
Ht 30% Wt 20% |
| Lai ( | 2000 | US | Randomized prospective longitudinal study (Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Project) |
Ht & wt near nml in those dx by NBS (without MI) up to age 13 ▪ Ht -0.06 SD ▪ Wt -0.02 SD |
| Farrell ( | 2001 | US | Randomized prospective longitudinal study (Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Project) |
Risk for wt or ht <10% ↓ those dx by NBS than non-screened (OR 4.12 wt & 4.62 ht) |
| Kastner-Cole ( | 2005 | UK | Cross-sectional study |
BMI M -0.28 to 0.8 SD; F -0.28 to 0 SD ▪ 10.2% OW or OB ▪ BMI ↓ late childhood/adolescence vs. infancy/early childhood |
| Hanna ( | 2015 | US | Cross-sectional study |
Malnourished (BMI <10%): 7% At risk (BMI 10-25%): 12% Healthy (BMI 25-85%): 57% OW or OB (BMI >85%): 23% |
| Zhang ( | 2016 | US | Randomized prospective longitudinal study (Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Project) |
Adult ht sig ↑ in those dx by NBS vs. non-screened Remained sig after genetic potential adjustment (32 vs 15%; p=0.006) |
| Wainwright ( | 2015 | Multinational | Two 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of Lum/iva (TRAFFIC and TRASNPORT) |
Sig BMI ↑ from baseline in tx groups (pooled data) (tx diff 0.24-0.28 kg/m2 p<0.001) ▪ Not stratified by age |
| Stalvey ( | 2017 | US | ENVISION (48 wk randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of ivacaftor) |
Ht sig ↑ from baseline ▪ GOAL (z-score ↑ 0.1 SD p<0.05) ▪ ENVISION (z-score ↑ 0.17 SD from baseline p<0.001; tx diff vs placebo 0.58 SD p<0.05) Wt sig ↑ from baseline ▪ GOAL (z-score ↑ 0.26 SD p<0.0001) ▪ ENVISION (z-score ↑ 0.35 SD from baseline p<0.001; tx diff vs. placebo 0.8 SD p<0.001) HV sig ↑ ▪ GOAL (↑ of 2.1 cm/yr from pre-baseline to baseline to 3-6 mo p<0.01) ▪ ENVISION (tx diff vs. placebo 1.08 cm/yr p<0.05) WV sig ↑ ▪ GOAL (↑ of 4.54 kg/yr from pre-baseline to baseline to 6 mo p<0.0001) ▪ ENVISION (tx diff vs. placebo 3.11 kg/yr p<0.001) |
| Taylor-Cousar ( | 2017 | Multinational | 24 wk randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial of Tez/iva (EVOLVE) |
No sig diff in BMI ↑ between tx & placebo |
| Ratjen ( | 2017 | Multinational | 24 wk randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Lum/iva |
No sig diff in BMI ↑ between tx & placebo groups |
| Middleton ( | 2019 | Multinational | 24 wk randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Elex/tez/iva |
Sig BMI ↑ vs. placebo (tx diff 1.04 kg/m2 p<0.001) Not stratified by age |
| Heijerman ( | 2019 | Multinational | 4 wk randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of Elex/tez/iva |
Sig ↑ wt (tx diff 1.6 kg p<0.001) Sig ↑BMI (tx diff 0.6 kg/m2 p<0.0001) Not stratified by age |
| Owen ( | 2021 | UK | Cross-sectional study |
Ht, BMI, FEV1 within nml Wt and body comp sig ↓ reference data ▪ 5% FFMI z-score <1 despite optimal BMI |
| CFF Annual Report 2020 ( | 2020 | US | n=31,411 (13,444 children) |
<2 yo ▪ Wt 0-2 years: 44.5% ▪ Ht 0-2: 31.5% ▪ WFL 0-2 years: 62.8% 2-19 yo ▪ Wt 2-19 years: 51.9% ▪ Ht 2-19: 38.7% ▪ BMI 2-19 years: 61.4% |
| Marks ( | 2021 | US | Retrospective case-control study |
Max ht between 2-4 yrs highly correlated w/max adult height (r=0.64) |
Wt, weight; ht height; abx, antibiotic; PERT, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy; dx, diagnosis; WV, weight velocity; HV, height velocity; M, male; F, female; pts, patients; diff, difference(s); sig, significantly; yo, year-olds; NBS, newborn screen; yrs, year(s); nml, normal; OW, overweight; OB, obese; tx, treatment; mo, month(s); lum/iva, lumacaftor/ivacaftor; wk, week(s); obs, observational; tez/iva, tezacaftor/ivacaftor; elex/tez/iva, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor; comp, composition; WFL, weight-for-length; max, maximum.
Relationship between Growth and Pulmonary Function.
| Author | Year | Location | Study Details | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sproul ( | 1964 | US | Longitudinal study over ≥ 2 yrs |
Severity of respiratory disease assoc w/ht (p=0.005) & wt (p<0.001) |
| Kreiβl ( | 1972 | Germany | Longitudinal study over 1-12 yrs |
Wt assoc with SK score (r=0.53) ▪ No assoc between SK score & ht |
| Berry ( | 1975 | US | Case-control study of ‘nutritional supplement’ |
Wt & ht pos correlated to clinical score ▪ Stronger assoc with wt than ht |
| Greco ( | 1993 | Italy | Longitudinal study 3-14 yrs |
Resp and GI events coincide with descending phase of HV and WV |
| Byard ( | 1994 | US | Longitudinal study |
RV/TLC assoc with HV at TO, PHV and PHV +2 yr |
| Nir ( | 1996 | Denmark | Cross-sectional study |
Sig assoc between BMI & FEV1 (p<0.0001) |
| Konstan ( | 2003 | US | Longitudinal study through at least age 6 yrs |
FEV1 highest in those who maintained wt >10% from 3-6 yrs FEV1 lowest in those whose wt remained <10% from 3-6 yrs |
| Stallings ( | 2008 | US | NA |
FEV1 (~≥80%) assoc with BMI ≥50% |
| Sheikh ( | 2014 | US | Cross-sectional study |
LBMI-z & BMI-z pos assoc with FEV1 (not FMI-z) LBMI-z more strongly assoc with FEV1 vs. BMI-z ▪ F p<0.0001 vs. p=0.001 ▪ M p<0.0001 for both |
| Hanna ( | 2015 | US | Cross-sectional study |
FEV1 lowest in nutritional failure p<0.0005 ▪ No sig diff in other 4 wt groups including normal wt vs. obese |
| Owen ( | 2021 | UK | Cross-sectional study |
WB FFMI & BMI pos assoc with FEV1 WB FFMI more strongly assoc with FEV1 vs. BMI (p=0.02 vs. p=0.08) |
| Sanders ( | 2021 | US | Longitudinal study through age 7 yrs |
FEV1 higher in children at 6-7 yo who maintained ht >50% vs. those with ht <50% after adjusting for BMI |
Assoc, associated; ht, height; wt, weight; SK, Shwachman- Kulczycki score; resp, respiratory; GI, gastrointestinal; HV, height velocity; WV, weight velocity; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity; TO, take-off; PHV, peak height velocity; yr, year(s); LBMI-z, lean body mass index z-score; pos, positively; FMI-z, fat mass index z-score; F, female; M male; sig significant; diff difference; WB FFMI whole body fat free mass index; yo years old.
CFTR Mutations and Modulator Therapies.
| Mutation Class (more severe to less severe) | Impact on CFTR | CFTR Modulator Therapy | Example of CFTR Modulator |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Defect in CFTR protein production | ||
| II (example Phe508del) | Ineffective CFTR protein processing → ineffective trafficking to cell surface | Corrector +/- potentiator | Ivacaftor/lumacaftor |
| III (example G551D) | Inability of CFTR protein to remain open “gating mutations” | Potentiator | Ivacaftor |
| IV | Ineffective CFTR protein with reduced chloride transport | Potentiator | Ivacaftor |
| V | Decreased CFTR synthesis | ||
| VI | Reduced CFTR stability |