| Literature DB >> 35902826 |
Xin Zhang1, Jia-Rui Yuan1, Xin Wang1, Shuang Fu1, Rui-Tao Wang2, Guang-Yu Wang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As a transmembrane protein, C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2) is mainly expressed on platelets and released into plasma after platelet activation. Activated platelets participate in the regulation of innate immune cells. Patients with different microsatellite statuses have distinct immune profiles. This study aimed to investigate the association of plasma CLEC-2 levels with microsatellite status among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.Entities:
Keywords: C-type lectin-like receptor 2; colorectal cancer; microsatellite instability; platelet activation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35902826 PMCID: PMC9330644 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09834-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.638
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with high microsatellite instability and microsatellite stable status
| Variables | MSI-H | MSS |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 64 | 366 | |
| Age (years) | 56.4 ± 11.8 | 59.9 ± 9.6 | 0.029* |
| Female (n, %) | 33 (51.6) | 148 (40.4) | 0.096 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.5 ± 3.3 | 23.2 ± 3.2 | 0.004** |
| Current smoker (%) | 25 (39.1) | 158 (43.2) | 0.540 |
| Drinker (n, %) | 17 (26.6) | 122 (33.3) | 0.285 |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 80.9 ± 19.7 | 81.1 ± 18.4 | 0.929 |
| WBC (× 109/L) | 8.07 ± 2.98 | 6.92 ± 2.30 | 0.004** |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 124.6 ± 27.3 | 134.3 ± 22.4 | 0.009** |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 286.2 ± 112.6 | 266.8 ± 82.6 | 0.191 |
| CLEC-2 (pg/mL) | 166.1 ± 41.3 | 133.5 ± 36.1 | < 0.001*** |
Values are means ± SD, median with interquartile range, or number with percentage
BMI body mass index, WBC white blood cells, CLEC-2 c-type lectin-like receptor 2, MSI-H high microsatellite instability, MSS microsatellite stable
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 vs. the values of MSS group
Clinicopathological features of of colorectal cancer patients according to microsatellite instability status
| Variables | Total | MSI-H | MSS |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Tumor location | < 0.001*** | |||
| Proximal | 150 (34.9) | 38 (59.4) | 112 (30.6) | |
| Distal | 280 (65.1) | 26 (40.6) | 254 (69.4) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.011* | |||
| < 5.0 | 282 (65.6) | 33 (51.6) | 249 (68.0) | |
| ≥ 5.0 | 148 (34.4) | 31 (48.4) | 117 (32.0) | |
| Histological grade | 0.254 | |||
| Well/Moderately differentiated | 314 (73.0) | 43 (67.2) | 271 (74.0) | |
| Poorly differentiated | 116 (27.0) | 21 (32.8) | 95 (26.0) | |
| Histological type | 0.001** | |||
| Non-mucinous | 368 (85.6) | 46 (71.9) | 322 (88.0) | |
| Mucinous | 62 (14.4) | 18 (28.1) | 44 (12.0) | |
| Lymphatic invasion | 0.030* | |||
| Absent | 331 (77.0) | 56 (87.5) | 275 (75.1) | |
| Present | 99 (23.0) | 8 (12.5) | 91 (24.9) | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.527 | |||
| Absent | 365 (84.9) | 56 (87.5) | 309 (84.4) | |
| Present | 65 (15.1) | 8 (12.5) | 57 (15.6) | |
| T classification | 0.811 | |||
| T1 + T2 | 63 (14.7) | 10 (15.6) | 53 (14.5) | |
| T3 + T4 | 367 (85.3) | 54 (84.4) | 313 (85.5) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.010** | |||
| Absence | 267 (62.1) | 49 (76.6) | 218 (59.6) | |
| Presence | 163 (37.9) | 15 (23.4) | 148 (40.4) | |
| Distant metastasis | 0.713 | |||
| Absence | 382 (88.8) | 56 (87.5) | 326 (89.1) | |
| Presence | 48 (11.2) | 8 (12.5) | 40 (10.9) | |
| Stage | 0.003** | |||
| I-II | 258 (60.0) | 49 (76.6) | 209 (57.1) | |
| III-IV | 172 (40.0) | 15 (23.4) | 157 (42.9) |
Values are number with percentage. Abbreviation as in Table 1. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 vs. the values of MSS group
Fig. 1The analysis of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Legends: Receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of high microsatellite instability based on c-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Baseline characteristics of colorectal cancer patients according to c-type lectin-like receptor 2 levels
| Variables | Total | CLEC-2 ≤ 166.3 | CLEC-2 > 166.3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.298 | |||
| ≤ 65 | 309 (71.9) | 247 (70.8) | 62 (76.5) | |
| > 65 | 121 (28.1) | 102 (29.2) | 19 (23.5) | |
| Gender | 0.432 | |||
| Male | 245 (57.0) | 202 (57.9) | 43 (53.1) | |
| Female | 185 (43.0) | 147 (42.1) | 38 (46.9) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.4 ± 3.2 | 23.9 ± 3.2 | 23.3 ± 3.2 | 0.166 |
| Current smoker | 0.906 | |||
| Yes | 183 (42.6) | 149 (42.0) | 34 (42.0) | |
| No | 247 (57.4) | 200 (58.0) | 47 (58.0) | |
| Drinker | 0.401 | |||
| Yes | 139 (32.3) | 116 (33.2) | 23 (28.4) | |
| No | 291 (67.7) | 233 (66.8) | 58 (71.6) | |
| WBC (×109/L) | 7.09 ± 2.44 | 7.35 ± 3.16 | 7.03 ± 2.25 | 0.393 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 132.9 ± 23.4 | 129.4 ± 25.2 | 133.7 ± 23.0 | 0.141 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 270.0 ± 87.8 | 265.6 ± 82.8 | 286.9 ± 105.7 | 0.093 |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 81.1 ± 18.6 | 83.0 ± 28.4 | 80.6 ± 15.4 | 0.467 |
| CEA (ng/ml) | 4.37 (2.03–11.31) | 3.82 (1.94–13.70) | 4.67 (2.12–10.67) | 0.768 |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.260 | |||
| < 5.0 | 278 (64.7) | 230 (65.9) | 48 (59.3) | |
| ≥ 5.0 | 152 (35.3) | 119 (34.1) | 33 (40.7) | |
| Tumor location | 0.687 | |||
| Proximal | 157 (36.5) | 129 (37.0) | 28 (34.6) | |
| Distal | 273 (63.5) | 220 (63.0) | 53 (65.4) | |
| Histological type | 0.383 | |||
| Non-mucinous | 359 (83.5) | 294 (84.2) | 65 (80.2) | |
| Mucinous | 71 (28.6) | 55 (15.8) | 16 (19.8) | |
| Histological grade | 0.835 | |||
| Well/Moderately differentiated | 359 (83.5) | 292 (83.7) | 67 (82.7) | |
| Poorly differentiated | 71 (28.6) | 57 (16.3) | 14 (17.3) | |
| Lymphatic invasion | 0.285 | |||
| Absent | 331 (77.0) | 265 (75.9) | 66 (81.5) | |
| Present | 99 (23.0) | 84 (24.1) | 15 (18.5) | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.545 | |||
| Absent | 365 (84.9) | 298 (85.4) | 67 (82.7) | |
| Present | 65 (15.1) | 51 (14.6) | 14 (17.3) | |
| T classification | 0.693 | |||
| T1 + T2 | 63 (14.7) | 50 (14.3) | 13 (16.0) | |
| T3 + T4 | 367 (85.3) | 299 (85.7) | 68 (84.0) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.665 | |||
| Absence | 267 (62.1) | 215 (61.6) | 52 (64.2) | |
| Presence | 163 (37.9) | 134 (38.4) | 29 (35.8) | |
| Distant metastasis | 0.707 | |||
| Absence | 382 (88.8) | 311 (89.1) | 71 (87.7) | |
| Presence | 48 (11.2) | 38 (10.9) | 10 (12.3) | |
| Stage | 0.392 | |||
| I-II | 258 (60.0) | 206 (59.0) | 52 (64.2) | |
| III-I | 172 (40.0) | 143 (41.0) | 29 (35.8) | |
| MSI status | < 0.001*** | |||
| MSS | 366 (85.1) | 318 (91.1) | 48 (59.3) | |
| MSI-H | 64 (14.9) | 31 (8.9) | 33 (40.7) |
Values are means ± SD, median with interquartile range, or number with percentage. MSI, microsatellite instability; Other abbreviation as in Table 1. ***p < 0.001 vs. the values of CLEC-2 > 166.3 group
Fig. 2The association between microsatellite instability status and c-type lectin-like receptor 2 levels among colorectal cancer patiens. Legends: The percentage of patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) rose as c-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2) levels increased in each quartile among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients
Associations between clinical factors and microsatellite instability status
| Variables | β | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | −0.040 | 0.961 (0.930–0.993) | 0.019* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.147 | 1.159 (1.049–1.280) | 0.004** |
| WBC (×109/L) | 0.141 | 1.151 (1.022–1.296) | 0.020* |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | −0.006 | 0.994 (0.981–1.007) | 0.358 |
CLEC-2 (pg/mL) (≤ 166.3 vs > 166.3) | 2.096 | 8.132 (4.047–16.341) | < 0.001*** |
Tumor size (cm) (≥ 5.0 vs < 5.0) | 0.949 | 2.582 (1.332–5.006) | 0.005** |
Tumor location (Proximal vs Distal) | 1.373 | 3.948 (1.968–7.920) | < 0.001*** |
Histological type (Mucinous vs Non-mucinous) | 1.037 | 2.820 (1.286–6.187) | 0.010* |
Lymphatic invasion (Presence vs Absence) | −0.365 | 0.694 (0.267–1.806) | 0.455 |
Lymph node metastasis (Presence vs Absence) | 0.219 | 1.245 (0.133–11.663) | 0.848 |
| Stage (III + IV vs I + II) | −1.031 | 0.357 (0.039–3.228) | 0.359 |
Values are logistic regression coefficient and odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. β, logistic regression coefficient; OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval; other abbreviation as in Table 1. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 vs. the values of MSS group