Literature DB >> 35902405

Novel "starburst" mesh configuration for paraesophageal and recurrent hiatal hernia repair: comparison with keyhole mesh configuration.

Emily Grimsley1, Ana Capati2, Adham R Saad2, Christopher DuCoin2, Vic Velanovich2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over the use of mesh, its type and configuration in repair of hiatal hernia. We have used biological mesh for large or recurrent hiatal hernias. We have developed a mesh configuration to better enhance the tensile strength of the hiatus by folding the mesh over the edge of the hiatus-entitled the "starburst" configuration. We report our experience with the starburst configuration, comparing it to our results with the keyhole configuration.
METHODS: Medical records of all patients undergoing either the keyhole or starburst mesh configuration hiatal hernia repair were reviewed between 2017 and 2021. Data gathered included age, sex, type of hernia (sliding, paraesophageal, or recurrent), fundoplication type (none, Nissen, Toupet, Dor, Collis-Nissen, Collis-Toupet, or magnetic sphincter augmentation [MSA]), 30-day complications, and long-term outcomes (hiatal hernia recurrence, reflux-symptom recurrence, dysphagia, dilations, reoperations).
RESULTS: From 7/2017 to 8/2019, 51 cases using the keyhole mesh were completed. Sliding hiatal hernia comprised 4%, paraesophageal hernia (PEH) 64% and recurrent hiatal hernia (RHH) 34% of cases. Distribution of fundoplication type: 2% none, 41% Nissen, 41% Toupet, 8% Dor, 2% Collis-Nissen, and 6% Collis-Toupet. 30-day complication rate 31%. Long-term outcomes: recurrent hiatal hernia 16%, dysphagia 12%, dysphagia requiring dilation(s) 10%, recurrent GERD symptoms 4%, and reoperation 14%. From 10/2020 to 8/2021, 58 cases using the starburst configuration were completed. PEH comprised 60% and RHH 40%. Distribution of fundoplication type: 10% none, 40% Nissen, 43% Toupet, 5% MSA, 2% Collis-Toupet. 30-day complication rate 16%. Long-term outcomes: recurrent hiatal hernia 19%, dysphagia 14%, dilations 5%, recurrent GERD symptoms 9%, and reoperations 3%.
CONCLUSION: The starburst mesh configuration compares favorably with the keyhole configuration with respect to postoperative dysphagia, need for esophageal dilation, and GERD symptom recurrence, with similar recurrence rates. We are continuing to further refine this technique and study the long-term outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological mesh; Mesh configuration; Paraesophageal hernia; Recurrent hiatal hernia

Year:  2022        PMID: 35902405     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09447-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  5 in total

1.  Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  A Analatos; B S Håkanson; L Lundell; M Lindblad; A Thorell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with mesh.

Authors:  D S Edelman
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-02

3.  Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: To Mesh or not to Mesh. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristian A Angeramo; Francisco Schlottmann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Urinary Bladder Matrix Reinforcement for Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  John Zografakis; Gregory Johnston; Jennifer Haas; Lindsay Berbiglia; Tyler Bedford; Justin Spear; Adrian Dan; Mark Pozsgay
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair With Urinary Bladder Matrix Graft.

Authors:  Raelina S Howell; Melissa Fazzari; Patrizio Petrone; Alexander Barkan; Keneth Hall; María José Servide; María Fernanda Anduaga; Collin E M Brathwaite
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.