| Literature DB >> 35902199 |
Monica Lakhanpaul1,2, Susrita Roy3, Lorna Benton4, Marie Lall5, Rajesh Khanna3, Virendra Kumar Vijay6, Sanjay Sharma7, Logan Manikam8,9, Neha Santwani3, Hanimi Reddy3, Hemant Chaturvedi10, Shereen Allaham8,9, Satya Prakash Pattanaik7, Tol Singh10, Pramod Pandya10, Priyanka Dang3, Priti Parikh11.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This interdisciplinary qualitative study aims to explore the health, education, engineering and environment factors impacting on feeding practices in rural India. The ultimate goal of the Participatory Approach for Nutrition in Children: Strengthening Health Education Engineering and Environment Linkages project is to identify challenges and opportunities for improvement to subsequently develop socioculturally appropriate, tailored, innovative interventions for the successful implementation of appropriate infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices locally.Entities:
Keywords: community child health; nutrition & dietetics; public health
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35902199 PMCID: PMC9341212 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 3.006
IYCF indicators in India, Rajasthan and Banswara district, NFHS-4; 2015–2016 (in %) and NFHS-5 (2019–2021)
| Indicators | NFHS-4 | NFHS-5 | ||||
| India | Rajasthan | Banswara | India | Rajasthan | Banswara | |
| Early initiation of breast feeding | 41.5 | 28.4 | 37.8 | 41.8 | 40.7 | 33.5 |
| Exclusive breast feeding under 6 months | 54.9 | 58.2 | 57.1 | 63.7 | 70.4 | 66.2 |
| Introduction of solid, semisolid or soft foods (6–8) months | 42.7 | 30.1 | Not available | 45.9 | 38.0 | Not available |
| Complementary feeding – minimum acceptable diet | 9.6 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 11.3 | 8.4 | 9.7 |
IYCF, infant and young child feeding.
Figure 1HEEE conceptual framework.20 21 HEEE, health, education, engineering and environment; ICDS, Integrated Child Development Scheme; VHSNC, Village Health Sanitation and Nutrition Committees.
Figure 2Consort diagram for selection of study villages.21 AWW, Anganwadi worker.
Respondents categories and methods
| Category of respondent | Method used | Numbers |
| Mothers and grandmothers | FGD | 17 |
| ANM | KII | 7 |
| AWW | KII | 13 |
| ASHA Sahyogini | KII | 13 |
| School teacher | KII | 9 |
| Local elected representative | KII | 9 |
ANM, auxiliary nurse midwife; AWW, Anganwadi worker; FGD, focus group discussion; KII, key informant interview.
Figure 3IYCF – current practices. FLWs: Frontline Workers.
Figure 4IYCF – key drivers and challenges: connecting subthemes. AWW, Anganwadi worker; AS, ASHA Sahyogini; WASH, water, sanitation and hygiene.
Figure 5Emergent model. ANM, auxiliary nurse midwife; FHW, frontline health worker; THR, take-home ration; PRI, Panchayati Raj Institutions; HH, Household; LPG, Liquefied Petroleum Gas; VHND, Village Health and Nutrition Day; CF, Complimentary Feeding; BM, Breast Milk.