| Literature DB >> 35900978 |
Narongsak Sukma1, Adisorn Leelasantitham1.
Abstract
The social network is a network of virtual relationships that can facilitate the development of a new society in which everyone can use online communication effectively. This article investigates and identifies the fundamental influences on the social network system, as well as the online behavior of the community users. This study was designed by any social network to help improve efficiency and offer people with services that match the needs of their communities. Furthermore, it increases participation in the equitable distribution of social benefits. This study investigates the critical factors that impact a community's view of community water user participation. The researcher sent a questionnaire on a five-point Likert scale to 1,000 community water customers and collected 627 valid replies. Data from 14 villages were sampled using a simple random sampling strategy to acquire the data. Subsequently, descriptive statistics are used to describe the data (frequency distributions, percentages, averages, medians, and standard deviation). Furthermore, PLS-SEM was used to examine the relationships between factors and to launch the conceptual model using PLS route modeling. This study reveals that digital technologies are crucial to increasing the expectations and happiness of the community through social networks. Multiple causes contribute to its expansion. In addition, this research provides an outstanding case study technique based on TAM and ECT to assess people's social networking and community participation habits. Additionally, community water providers participate in social networks by certifying that their expectations are met.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35900978 PMCID: PMC9333291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1The research models.
Demographic data of respondents, total (N = 627).
| Characteristics | Values | Frequency | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 269 | 42.9 |
| Female | 358 | 57.1 | |
| Age (years) | 18–30 | 101 | 16.1 |
| 30–40 | 182 | 29.0 | |
| 41–50 | 187 | 29.8 | |
| > 50 | 157 | 25.0 | |
| Education | < bachelor | 446 | 71.1 |
| bachelor | 148 | 23.6 | |
| > bachelor | 33 | 5.3 | |
| Community water usages (years) | < 5 | 38 | 6.1 |
| 5–10 | 128 | 20.4 | |
| 11–15 | 79 | 12.6 | |
| > 15 | 382 | 60.9 |
Construct reliability and validity.
| Constructs | Item code | Cronbach’s alpha (> 0.70) | Composite Reliability (CR) (> 0.70) | AVE (> 0.50) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmation | CO | 0.804 | 0.884 | 0.718 |
| Participation intention | PI | 0.787 | 0.876 | 0.701 |
| Perceived Usefulness | PU | 0.797 | 0.879 | 0.709 |
| Satisfaction | SA | 0.820 | 0.893 | 0.737 |
| Social networks | SO | 0.791 | 0.877 | 0.705 |
| Stakeholders | ST | 0.783 | 0.874 | 0.698 |
| Transparency | TR | 0.816 | 0.891 | 0.731 |
The reliability and validity of the results.
| Construct | Question items | Mean | S.D. | Loading (>0.70) | VIF (<5.00) | Adapted from | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived Usefulness | PU01 | You think that social networks help you do your job faster and make it easier to find the information you need. | 3.805 | 0.828 | 0.796 | 1.643 | [ |
| PU02 | You think that social networks help you to complete activities more rapidly. | 3.949 | 0.750 | 0.879 | 1.774 | ||
| PU03 | You believe that social network is beneficial and can help you perform better at work. | 3.931 | 0.779 | 0.848 | 1.686 | ||
| Satisfaction | SA01 | You are satisfied with your social network experience. | 4.104 | 0.809 | 0.883 | 2.163 | [ |
| SA02 | you satisfied with your capacity to utilize social network features | 4.131 | 0.827 | 0.879 | 2.112 | ||
| SA03 | You think you made the right decision to use social networks. | 3.994 | 0.795 | 0.810 | 1.566 | ||
| Confirmation | CO01 | You are perpetually willing to help with community events. | 4.041 | 0.817 | 0.855 | 1.788 | [ |
| CO02 | You take pride in your community membership. | 4.016 | 0.808 | 0.845 | 1.803 | ||
| CO03 | You believe it is critical to establish and maintain positive relationships with community-based organizations. | 4.037 | 0.764 | 0.841 | 1.634 | ||
| Social networks | SO01 | You are always on social networks. | 3.841 | 0.822 | 0.848 | 1.670 | [ |
| SO02 | You use social media to stay informed and connect with loved ones. | 4.094 | 0.716 | 0.855 | 1.733 | ||
| SO03 | You think that social media makes life easier. | 4.155 | 0.626 | 0.815 | 1.607 | ||
| Stakeholders | ST01 | You think bringing people together for activities helps the community’s image. | 4.019 | 0.723 | 0.865 | 1.834 | [ |
| ST02 | You think that local and community activities help the community to work together and improve its economic well-being. | 3.939 | 0.766 | 0.819 | 1.575 | ||
| ST03 | You think it’s vital to share responsibility for community and environment. | 4.064 | 0.794 | 0.821 | 1.583 | ||
| Transparency | TP01 | The community should know and understand the rules before they are implemented, you believe. | 4.062 | 0.834 | 0.868 | 1.852 | [ |
| TP02 | You think everyone should consider public topics like income and expenses. | 4.121 | 0.854 | 0.861 | 1.963 | ||
| TP03 | You think the organization office should share accurate data in an easy-to-read format. | 4.072 | 0.816 | 0.835 | 1.679 | ||
| Participation intention | PI01 | You intend to continue utilizing social network rather than personally visiting an organization office. | 4.027 | 0.754 | 0.863 | 1.752 | [ |
| PI02 | You plan to continue utilizing social network rather than discontinue doing so. | 4.041 | 0.800 | 0.855 | 1.738 | ||
| PI03 | You want to continue to use social network in the future | 3.876 | 0.745 | 0.793 | 1.523 | ||
Fornell-Larcker criterion.
| Constructs | CO | PI | PU | SA | SO | ST | TP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmation (CO) | 0.847 | ||||||
| Participation intention (PI) | 0.535 | 0.838 | |||||
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | 0.466 | 0.401 | 0.842 | ||||
| Satisfaction (SA) | 0.636 | 0.601 | 0.480 | 0.858 | |||
| Social networks (SO) | 0.544 | 0.466 | 0.441 | 0.512 | 0.840 | ||
| Stakeholders (ST) | 0.627 | 0.569 | 0.465 | 0.674 | 0.517 | 0.835 | |
| Transparency (TR) | 0.599 | 0.522 | 0.504 | 0.658 | 0.493 | 0.626 | 0.855 |
Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT).
| Constructs | CO | PI | PU | SA | SO | ST | TP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmation | |||||||
| Participation intention | 0.671 | ||||||
| Perceived Usefulness | 0.566 | 0.497 | |||||
| Satisfaction | 0.783 | 0.744 | 0.578 | ||||
| Social networks | 0.677 | 0.587 | 0.550 | 0.637 | |||
| Stakeholders | 0.787 | 0.724 | 0.582 | 0.841 | 0.657 | ||
| Transparency | 0.738 | 0.646 | 0.612 | 0.803 | 0.609 | 0.781 |
Results of the structural model.
| Hypothesis | Path | Path coefficient (β (>0.10) | t-value (>1.96) | p-value (<0.05) | Inner VIF (<5) | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Confirmation -> Perceived Usefulness | 0.190 | 3.711 | 0.000 | 1.863 | Supported |
| H2 | Confirmation -> Satisfaction | 0.527 | 15.076 | 0.000 | 1.277 | Supported |
| H3 | Perceived Usefulness -> Participation intention | 0.146 | 3.948 | 0.000 | 1.299 | Supported |
| H4 | Perceived Usefulness -> Satisfaction | 0.234 | 6.657 | 0.000 | 1.277 | Supported |
| H5 | Satisfaction -> Participation intention | 0.531 | 13.919 | 0.000 | 1.299 | Supported |
| H6 | Social network -> Stakeholders | 0.517 | 14.004 | 0.000 | 1.000 | Supported |
| H7 | Social network -> Transparency | 0.493 | 13.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | Supported |
| H8 | Stakeholders -> Confirmation | 0.414 | 10.414 | 0.000 | 1.644 | Supported |
| H9 | Stakeholders -> Perceived Usefulness | 0.168 | 3.616 | 0.000 | 1.962 | Supported |
| H10 | Transparency -> Confirmation | 0.340 | 8.936 | 0.000 | 1.644 | Supported |
| H11 | Transparency -> Perceived Usefulness | 0.286 | 5.497 | 0.000 | 1.859 | Supported |
Fig 2PLS algorithm results.