Literature DB >> 35900744

Regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Jaime L Baratta1, Eric S Schwenk2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the removal of both total knee and total hip arthroplasty from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' inpatient-only list, efforts to improve efficiency of the perioperative management of total joint patients have increased recently. The publication of several recent studies examining the impact of anesthesia type on outcomes has prompted the need to review the overall state of evidence for spinal versus general anesthesia for outpatient total joint arthroplasty. RECENT
FINDINGS: Overall complication rates are low in this carefully selected patient population. The majority of patients who are preselected for outpatient total joint arthroplasty appear to successfully achieve this outcome. Some retrospective studies have suggested a benefit for spinal anesthesia in terms of same-day discharge success but direct comparisons in prospective studies are lacking.
SUMMARY: The type of anesthesia used for total joint arthroplasty may have an important effect on outcomes. Until randomized control trials are performed we must rely on existing evidence, which suggests that both spinal and general anesthesia can lead to successful outcomes after ambulatory total joint arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35900744     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.733


  1 in total

1.  Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Who Received Spinal Chloroprocaine for Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty-Consecutive Case Series Study.

Authors:  Khaleifah Alhefeiti; Ana-Maria Patrascu; Sebastien Lustig; Frederic Aubrun; Mikhail Dziadzko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.