Literature DB >> 35900385

Nasal sinuses cholesteatoma: case series and review of the English literature.

Ahmed Nabil Abdelhamid Ahmed1, Mohamed M Elsharnouby2, Marwa Mohamed Elbegermy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasal sinus cholesteatomas are uncommon slow-growing lesions that are frequently misdiagnosed preoperatively. They can develop due to embryologic remnants or iatrogenic factors (surgical trauma or nasal sinus trauma). In addition, they can cause bone destruction resulting in intracranial or intraorbital complications as well as malignant change if neglected. Complete surgical removal is a must with strict postoperative follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three cases of nasal sinus cholesteatoma are reported. The first case was found inside the ethmoidal sinus, the second in the frontal sinus, and the third was found inside a concha bullosa. In all three cases, a wide endoscopic surgical excision was performed. Due to the lateral extension of the lesion, frontal sinus trephine was also used in the case of frontal sinus nasal cholesteatoma. In addition, a review of the English literature for the reported cases of nasal sinus cholesteatomas was conducted.
RESULTS: There were no reported recurrence or residual during strict postoperative follow-up for 2 years (by endoscopic examination and diffusion-weighted MRI with delayed postcontrast T1 images). A review of the English literature revealed 42 cases of nasal sinuses cholesteatomas (including the present three cases) (17 in the frontal sinus, 15 in the maxillary sinus, 5 in the ethmoid sinus, 3 in the sphenoid sinus, and 2 in a concha bullosa).
CONCLUSIONS: Although nasal sinus cholesteatomas are uncommon, they must be considered in the differential diagnosis of slow-growing nasal sinuses lesions. Preoperative CT scan and diffusion-weighted MRI are essential for proper diagnosis and to exclude other similar lesions, such as nasal sinus mucoceles, cholesterol granuloma, or neoplastic lesions. Wide complete surgical excision is necessary to avoid recurrence and facilitate postoperative follow-up. As with ear cholesteatoma, strict postoperative follow-up is required to detect recurrence or residual early and is performed by endoscopic examination, diffusion-weighted MRI, and delayed post-gadolinium T1 images.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion-weighted imaging; Nasal sinus neoplasms; Sinus cholesteatoma; Sinus epidermoid; Sinus keratoma; Sinus mucocele

Year:  2022        PMID: 35900385     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07564-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   3.236


  34 in total

Review 1.  Cholesteatoma of the frontal sinus.

Authors:  B Hammami; M Mnejja; A Chakroun; I Achour; A Chakroun; I Charfeddine; A Ghorbel
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.080

2.  Cholesteatoma of the frontal sinus.

Authors:  T C Calcaterra; H E Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Cholesteatoma of the paranasal sinuses: case report & review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Hartman; J A Stankiewicz
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.697

Review 4.  Massive cholesteatoma of the frontal sinus: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Søren Hansen; Christian Hjort Sørensen; Jan Stage; Anne Mouritzen; Per Cayé-Thomasen
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 1.863

5.  Cholesteatoma of maxillary sinus.

Authors:  S K Das
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Late recurrence of a frontal sinus cholesteatoma.

Authors:  G R Holt; J E Holt; W E Davis
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Primary and secondary keratomas of the frontal sinus.

Authors:  M L Hopp; W W Montgomery
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in cholesteatoma: the Indian experience.

Authors:  Sanjay Vaid; Yogesh Kamble; Neelam Vaid; Sumit Bhatti; Sudarshan Rawat; Avinash Nanivadekar; Sandeep Karmarkar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-16

Review 9.  Origin of congenital cholesteatoma from a normally occurring epidermoid rest in the developing middle ear.

Authors:  L Michaels
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Cholesteatoma of the frontal and ethmoid areas.

Authors:  R S Campanella; D D Caldarelli; S A Friedberg
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.