| Literature DB >> 35899690 |
Hanna Luze1,2, Andrzej Hecker1,2, Sebastian Philipp Nischwitz1,2, Marlies Schellnegger1, Michael Kohlhauser1, Alexander Draschl3, Clemens Müllegger3, Lars-Peter Kamolz1,2, Petra Kotzbeck1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The increasing prevalence of obesity is a major health problem worldwide. Several non-surgical treatments are now available that reduce body and subcutaneous fat mass. We aimed to determine the efficacy of mild cold for body mass reduction.Entities:
Keywords: Non-surgical weight loss; beige adipocyte; brown adipose tissue; cooling wear; fat reduction; subcutaneous adipose thickness
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35899690 PMCID: PMC9340944 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221109391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.573
Figure A1.Schema of the study design. At baseline, BMI, body mass, abdominal circumference and subcutaneous fat thickness were measured. After 2 weeks of daily application of the cooling wear, abdominal circumference and subcutaneous fat thickness were measured. After 4 weeks, the participants’ BMI, body mass, abdominal circumference and subcutaneous fat thickness were measured, and they completed a questionnaire.
BMI: body mass index; BFP: body fat percentage.
Figure 1.Schema of the anatomically defined whole-body lipometry measurement locations (a) and specific measurement locations within the abdominal region (b).
Overview of the body mass, BMI, abdominal circumference, BFP and abdominal SAT thickness after 2 and 4 weeks of cooling wear application for 1 hour/day.
| N = 29 | BaselineMean (±SD) | 2 weeksMean (±SD) | 4 weeksMean (±SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age [years] | 39.5 (13.4) | |||||
| Body mass [kg] | 75.2 (±7.6) | 74.5 (±7.5) | 0.005** | |||
| BMI [kg/m²] | 27.1 (±1.8) | 26.9 (±1.7) | 0.005** | |||
| Abdominalcircumference [cm] | 90.0 (±8.0) | 89.2 (±7.9) | 88.1 (±7.6) | <0.001*** | <0.001*** | <0.001*** |
| Total BFP [%] | 33.4 (±6.9) | 32.9 (±6.5) | 31.9 (±5.9) | 0.41 | 0.03* | 0.02* |
| Abdominal SATthickness [mm] | 12.7 (±3.4) | 12.6 (±3.9) | 12.5 (±3.5) | 0.8535 | 0.5750 | 0.9342 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; BFP, body fat percentage; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Figure 2.Cooling wear treatment for 1 hour/day for 4 weeks reduces body mass (a), body mass index (BMI) (b) and abdominal circumference (c). n = 29. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA with followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test or Student’s t-test, as appropriate).
Overview of the SAT thickness of the abdomen, hip and thigh regions after 2 and 4 weeks of cooling wear application for 1 hour/day.
| N = 29 | BaselineMean (±SD) | 2 weeksMean (±SD) | 4 weeksMean (±SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper abdominal fat thickness [mm] | 12.4 (±3.6) | 12.2 (±3.4) | 12.4 (±3.7) | 0.8714 | 0.8544 | 0.9925 |
| Lower abdominal fat thickness [mm] | 12.2 (±3.7) | 12.4 (±3.9) | 11.8 (±3.9) | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.65 |
| Hip fat thickness [mm] | 14.3 (±5.5) | 14.1 (±4.5) | 13.7 (±4.6) | 0.91 | 0.44 | 0.50 |
| Anterior thigh fat thickness [mm] | 9.3 (±2.1) | 9.4 (±1.9) | 8.6 (±2.0) | 0.97 | 0.03* | 0.13 |
| Lateral thigh fatthickness [mm] | 9.4 (±2.4) | 9.2 (±2.5) | 9.2 (±2.1) | 0.85 | 0.99 | 0.89 |
| Medial thigh fatthickness [mm] | 10.0 (±2.5) | 9.5 (±1.8) | 9.0 (±2.3) | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.19 |
| Posterior thigh fat thickness [mm] | 6.8 (±1.8) | 7.1 (±1.8) | 6.7 (±1.8) | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.87 |
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; BFP, body fat percentage; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue. *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test or Student’s t-test, as appropriate).
Figure 3.(a) Significant reduction in total body fat percentage induced by 1 hour/day cooling wear application for 4 weeks and (b) No significant reduction in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) thickness was detected after cooling wear treatment for 4 weeks. *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test or Student’s t-test, as appropriate).