| Literature DB >> 35899171 |
Bao-Chang Xu1, Xiao-Ni Xu1, Jin-Chun Zhao2, Meng Zhang3.
Abstract
As a necessary supplement to social medical insurance, commercial health insurance is an important part of the Healthy China strategy. This study, based on the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) data in 2017, uses the probit model to analyze and study the internal relationship between Internet use and commercial health insurance purchase of urban and rural residents. The research results show that the use of the Internet significantly promoted commercial health insurance purchases of residents, and the promotion effect for rural residents is apparently better than that among urban residents. In addition, the social level of residents is improved through the use of Internet, which can promote commercial health insurance purchases. It provides a significant reference value for the effective integration of Internet use and commercial health insurance, and the high-quality development of the modern insurance industry.Entities:
Keywords: CGSS2017; China; Internet use; binary probit; commercial health insurance
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35899171 PMCID: PMC9311374 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.907124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Variable definition and assignment.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Internetuse | Yes = 1,No = 0 |
| Insurance | Yes = 1, No = 0 |
| Age | Age (years) |
| Age_2 | Age squared |
| Gender | Male = 1, Female = 0 |
| Edu | Whether it's high school/technical secondary school or above: Yes = 1, No = 0 |
| Household | Town = 1, Country = 0 |
| Marriage | Yes = 1, No = 0 |
| Health | From 1 to 5, get better |
| ln_fincome | Take the logarithm of last year's household income |
| Familysize | Number of people living together currently |
Descriptive statistics of variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internetuse | 10,900 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0 | 1 |
| Insurance | 10,900 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0 | 1 |
| Age | 10,900 | 50.84 | 16.37 | 19 | 85 |
| Age_2 | 10,900 | 2852.78 | 1683.62 | 361 | 7,225 |
| Gender | 10,900 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 |
| Edu | 10,900 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0 | 1 |
| Household | 10,900 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0 | 1 |
| Marriage | 10,900 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 0 | 1 |
| Health | 10,900 | 3.48 | 1.09 | 1 | 5 |
| ln_fincome | 10,900 | 10.63 | 1.24 | 5.19 | 16.12 |
| Familysize | 10,900 | 2.80 | 1.37 | 1 | 12 |
Benchmark regression.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Internetuse | 0.9046*** | 0.2473*** |
| (0.0408) | (0.0526) | |
| Age | 0.0406*** | |
| (0.0080) | ||
| Age_2 | −0.0005*** | |
| (0.0001) | ||
| Gender | −0.0122 | |
| (0.0349) | ||
| Edu | 0.3800*** | |
| (0.0403) | ||
| Household | 0.1861*** | |
| (0.0479) | ||
| Marriage | −0.0665 | |
| (0.0495) | ||
| Health | 0.0361* | |
| (0.0191) | ||
| ln_fincome | 0.2621*** | |
| (0.0214) | ||
| Familysize | −0.0246* | |
| (0.0144) | ||
| N | 10,900 | 10,900 |
|
| 0.0767 | 0.1540 |
The ***, **, and * in the table, respectively show the significance under the significance level of 1, 5, and 10%, and the robust standard errors are shown in the brackets. The same as in the following tables.
Robustness test.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Internetuse | 0.7869*** | 0.2628*** |
| (0.0335) | (0.0460) | |
| Age | 0.0470*** | |
| (0.0080) | ||
| Age_2 | −0.0005*** | |
| (0.0001) | ||
| Gender | −0.0133 | |
| (0.0350) | ||
| Edu | 0.3756*** | |
| (0.0403) | ||
| Household | 0.1900*** | |
| (0.0476) | ||
| Marriage | −0.0739 | |
| (0.0493) | ||
| Health | 0.0387** | |
| (0.0191) | ||
| ln_fincome | 0.2617*** | |
| (0.0213) | ||
| Familysize | −0.0233 | |
| (0.0144) | ||
| N | 10,858 | 10,858 |
|
| 0.0753 | 0.1560 |
** means the coefficient is significant at the 5% level. *** means the coefficient is significant at the 1% level.
Heterogeneity test-Urban-rural differences.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Internetuse | 0.6346*** | 0.2729*** | 0.8565*** | 0.2546*** |
| (0.0738) | (0.0972) | (0.0529) | (0.0653) | |
| Age | 0.0279 | 0.0452*** | ||
| (0.0171) | (0.0092) | |||
| Age_2 | −0.0003* | −0.0005*** | ||
| (0.0002) | (0.0001) | |||
| Gender | 0.1571** | −0.0636 | ||
| (0.0775) | (0.0394) | |||
| Edu | 0.4214*** | 0.3581*** | ||
| (0.0957) | (0.0443) | |||
| Marriage | 0.0033 | −0.0750 | ||
| (0.1055) | (0.0569) | |||
| Health | 0.0163 | 0.0482** | ||
| (0.0375) | (0.0224) | |||
| ln_fincome | 0.2129*** | 0.2820*** | ||
| (0.0445) | (0.0244) | |||
| Familysize | 0.0406 | −0.0490*** | ||
| (0.0257) | (0.0173) | |||
| N | 3,899 | 3,899 | 6,959 | 6,959 |
|
| 0.0545 | 0.1132 | 0.0534 | 0.1205 |
** means the coefficient is significant at the 5% level. *** means the coefficient is significant at the 1% level.
The relationship between residents' health and commercial insurance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internetuse | 0.2504447 | 0.0528319 | 4.74 | 0.000 | 0.1468961 | 0.3539932 |
| _cons | −5.332939 | 0.3002147 | −17.76 | 0.000 | −5.921349 | −4.744529 |
The relationship between insurance participation and interact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internetuse | 0.1911618 | 0.0459592 | 4.16 | 0.000 | 0.1010835 | 0.2812402 |
| _cons | 0.6616746 | 0.2345751 | 2.82 | 0.005 | 0.2019159 | 1.121433 |
Total effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social level | 0.1825944 | 0.0619912 | 2.95 | 0.003 | 0.0610939 | 0.3040948 |
| Internetuse | 0.2475008 | 0.0529434 | 4.67 | 0.000 | 0.1437335 | 0.351268 |
| _cons | −5.476637 | 0.3011626 | −18.18 | 0.000 | −6.066905 | −4.886369 |