| Literature DB >> 35898997 |
Changqing Xiang1,2, Tengku Fadilah Tengku Kamalden1, Hejian Liu3, Normala Ismail4.
Abstract
Talent is one of the most significant factors to promote the development of sports undertakings. The present study aimed to explore the factors affecting the identification of sports talents in China's physical education curriculum. Based on the literature review, this study puts forward a model to examine the influencing factors of sports talent identification in China's physical education curriculum using structural equation modeling and uses the structural equation modeling and factor analysis method to verify the hypothesis combined with the results of 310 effective questionnaires. The article summarizes influencing factors from four aspects, namely, physical, psychological, coach, and environmental factors. On the basis of relevant literature, the hypothesis model was established by structural equation modeling. The results show that the main factors affecting the identification of sports talents in the physical education curriculum are personal physical quality performance, psychological quality, coach's knowledge, and the identification policies of schools to sports talents. The conclusion of this study can provide guidance for the reform of the physical education curriculum, the growth of sports talents, and the development of sports talents in China.Entities:
Keywords: SEM; factors; identification; physical education; sport talent
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898997 PMCID: PMC9311482 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Measurement items.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A1 | Physical | Height and weight |
| A2 | Motor ability index | |
| A3 | The quality of anthropometric index | |
| B1 | Psychological | The motivation of students to participate in sports |
| B2 | Personal qualities | |
| B3 | Students' cognition of sports | |
| C1 | Coach | Professional level |
| C2 | The relationship between coaches and students | |
| C3 | Moral education and management ability of coaches | |
| D1 | Environmental | Policy and system guarantee within the school |
| D2 | Degree of emphasis on talent cultivation | |
| D3 | School sports atmosphere |
Figure 1Theoretical model.
Figure 2Conceptual model.
KMO and Bartlett sphere test.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Bartlett's test of sphericity | Approx. chi-square | 1,366.274 |
| df | 66 | |
| Sig. | 0.000 | |
Reliability analysis.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | A1 | 0.832 | 0.716 | 0.752 | 0.507 |
| A2 | 0.604 | ||||
| A3 | 0.680 | ||||
| Psychological | B1 | 0.674 | 0.723 | 0.725 | 0.475 |
| B2 | 0.836 | ||||
| B3 | 0.590 | ||||
| Coaches | C1 | 0.815 | 0.734 | 0.849 | 0.652 |
| C2 | 0.842 | ||||
| C3 | 0.764 | ||||
| Environmental | D1 | 0.567 | 0.751 | 0.819 | 0.614 |
| D2 | 0.821 | ||||
| D3 | 0.722 |
Figure 3Confirmatory factor analysis model.
Figure 4Unstandardized estimates.
Figure 5Standardized estimates.
Sample correlations (group number 1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 1.000 | |||||||||||
| A2 | 0.451 | 1.000 | ||||||||||
| A3 | 0.456 | 0.466 | 1.000 | |||||||||
| B1 | 0.353 | 0.367 | 0.344 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| B2 | 0.286 | 0.315 | 0.380 | 0.441 | 1.000 | |||||||
| B3 | 0.303 | 0.344 | 0.374 | 0.468 | 0.487 | 1.000 | ||||||
| C1 | 0.348 | 0.445 | 0.387 | 0.329 | 0.466 | 0.414 | 1.000 | |||||
| C2 | 0.345 | 0.306 | 0.287 | 0.359 | 0.333 | 0.505 | 0.389 | 1.000 | ||||
| C3 | 0.257 | 0.317 | 0.279 | 0.430 | 0.353 | 0.446 | 0.447 | 0.601 | 1.000 | |||
| D1 | 0.357 | 0.353 | 0.418 | 0.352 | 0.386 | 0.410 | 0.487 | 0.425 | 0.401 | 1.000 | ||
| D2 | 0.302 | 0.481 | 0.330 | 0.316 | 0.343 | 0.430 | 0.480 | 0.314 | 0.388 | 0.466 | 1.000 | |
| D3 | 0.317 | 0.449 | 0.356 | 0.339 | 0.338 | 0.402 | 0.413 | 0.428 | 0.396 | 0.481 | 0.556 | 1.000 |
Fit index value of SEM.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| χ2 | The smaller, the better | 118.033 |
| χ2/df | <3.0 | 2.495 |
| GFI | >0.9 | 0.939 |
| AGFI | >0.9 | 0.901 |
| RMSEA | <0.08 | 0.069 |
| NNFI | >0.9 | 0.915 |
| IFI | >0.9 | 0.948 |
| CFI | >0.9 | 0.947 |
CFA parameter estimation results.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 < – Physical | 1.000 | 0.632 | 0.399 | ||
| A2 < – Physical | 1.060 | 0.115 | 9.258*** | 0.715 | 0.511 |
| A3 < – Physical | 0.992 | 0.110 | 8.988*** | 0.679 | 0.461 |
| B1 < – Psychological | 1.000 | 0.648 | 0.420 | ||
| B2 < – Psychological | 0.951 | 0.102 | 9.290*** | 0.657 | 0.431 |
| B3 < – Psychological | 1.112 | 0.110 | 10.089*** | 0.740 | 0.548 |
| C1 < – Coaches | 1.000 | 0.667 | 0.445 | ||
| C2 < – Coaches | 1.242 | 0.122 | 10.175*** | 0.703 | 0.494 |
| C3 < – Coaches | 1.158 | 0.111 | 10.393*** | 0.723 | 0.523 |
| D1 < – Environmental | 1.000 | 0.694 | 0.481 | ||
| D2 < – Environmental | 1.054 | 0.099 | 10.613*** | 0.709 | 0.502 |
| D3 < – Environmental | 1.090 | 0.101 | 10.791*** | 0.724 | 0.524 |
***p-value is < 0.001.
Rotating component matrix.
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| A1 | 0.832 | Physical | |||
| A2 | 0.604 | ||||
| A3 | 0.680 | ||||
| B1 | 0.614 | Psychological | |||
| B2 | 0.836 | ||||
| B3 | 0.590 | ||||
| C1 | 0.815 | Coaches | |||
| C2 | 0.842 | ||||
| C3 | 0.764 | ||||
| D1 | 0.567 | Environmental | |||
| D2 | 0.821 | ||||
| D3 | 0.722 | ||||
Total variance interpretation.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 5.311 | 44.260 | 44.260 | 2.459 | 20.490 | 20.490 |
| 2 | 1.062 | 8.849 | 53.110 | 1.891 | 15.758 | 36.248 |
| 3 | 0.904 | 7.533 | 60.643 | 1.867 | 15.559 | 51.807 |
| 4 | 0.782 | 6.521 | 67.164 | 1.843 | 15.356 | 67.164 |
| 5 | 0.671 | 5.595 | 72.758 | |||
| 6 | 0.601 | 5.012 | 77.771 | |||
| 7 | 0.548 | 4.570 | 82.341 | |||
| 8 | 0.523 | 4.355 | 86.696 | |||
| 9 | 0.476 | 3.967 | 90.663 | |||
| 10 | 0.418 | 3.487 | 94.150 | |||
| 11 | 0.389 | 3.241 | 97.391 | |||
| 12 | 0.313 | 2.609 | 100.000 | |||
Extraction method: principal component analysis.