| Literature DB >> 35898677 |
Riaz Hussain1, Iahtasham Khan2, Adil Jamal3, Bahaeldeen Babiker Mohamed4, Ahrar Khan5,6.
Abstract
Brucellosis is a well-known and harmful zoonotic disease that poses a severe threat to public health and wild and dairy animals. Due to a lack of monitoring and awareness, disease incidence has increased. Therefore, this study was conducted for the first time to ascertain the status of seroprevalence of brucellosis, hematological, oxidative stress, and antioxidant enzymes in different breeds of cattle reared under tropical-desert conditions in Pakistan. This study comprised 570 cattle of different breeds. We recorded some epidemiological traits, including age and gender. The blood samples were obtained from all the cattle, screened with RBPT, and then confirmed by ELISA and PCR. The results recorded an overall 11.75%, 10.7%, and 9.64% prevalence of brucellosis based on RBPT, ELISA, and PCR. We obtained nonsignificant results in different age and sex groups of cattle. The results showed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower values of erythrocyte counts, hemoglobin quantity, hematocrit, lymphocytes, and monocytes in infected cases. The results showed that the total leukocyte and neutrophil cells significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased. The lipid peroxidation parameters (MDA- and NO-scavenging activity of erythrocyte) increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) in infected cattle, whereas significantly reduced antioxidant enzymes like SOD, RGSH, and CAT were. Similarly, significantly lower serum albumin levels and total serum proteins were recorded in infected cattle.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898677 PMCID: PMC9314157 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7140909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
RBPT-, ELISA-, and PCR-based prevalence of brucellosis in cattle kept at the Cholistan.
| Species/sex/age | No. of animals | Positive | 95% CI | Odd ratio/ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % | ||||
| RBPT test | |||||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 31 | 03 | 9.67 | 2.52-24.12 | 0.80 (reciprocal = 1.26) |
| Female | 539 | 64 | 11.87 | 9.34-14.81 | |
| Overall | 570 | 67 | 11.75 | ||
| Age groups (years) | |||||
| 3-4 | 167 | 13 | 7.78 | 4.40-12.63 | Mantel-Haenszel chi-sq. |
| 5-6 | 305 | 39 | 12.78 | 9.38-16.90 | |
| >7 | 98 | 15 | 15.30 | 9.17-23.47 | |
| ELISA | |||||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 31 | 02 | 6.45 | 1.10-19.72 | 0.56 (reciprocal = 1.78) |
| Female | 539 | 59 | 10.94 | 8.51-13.80 | |
| Overall | 570 | 61 | 10.70 | ||
| Age groups (years) | |||||
| 3-4 | 167 | 11 | 6.58 | 3.51-11.16 | Mantel-Haenszel chi-sq. |
| 5-6 | 305 | 36 | 11.80 | 8.53-15.80 | |
| >7 | 98 | 14 | 14.28 | 8.37-22.29 | |
| Polymerase chain reaction | |||||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 31 | 02 | 6.45 | 1.10-19.72 | 0.63 (reciprocal = 1.58) |
| Female | 539 | 53 | 9.83 | 7.53-12.57 | |
| Overall | 570 | 55 | 9.64 | 7.42-12.28 | |
| Age groups (years) | |||||
| 3-4 | 167 | 09 | 5.38 | 2.66-9.66 | Mantel-Haenszel chi-sq. |
| 5-6 | 305 | 35 | 11.47 | 8.25-15.43 | |
| >7 | 98 | 11 | 11.22 | 6.05-18.67 | |
Blood profile (mean ± SD) of different breeds of cattle infected with brucellosis.
| Cattle breed/parameters | Healthy | Infected |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cholistani | |||
| Erythrocyte counts (106/ | 5.01 ± 0.15 | 3.69 ± 0.09 | <0.01 |
| Hemoglobin quantity (g/dL) | 11.97 ± 1.12 | 8.19 ± 0.13 | <0.01 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 34.50 ± 1.30 | 28.9 ± 2.3 | <0.01 |
| Leukocyte counts (103/ | 9.11 ± 0.89 | 13.83 ± 0.71 | <0.01 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 19.70 ± 1.90 | 25.9 ± 1.7 | <0.01 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 49.80 ± 3.70 | 31.5 ± 1.83 | <0.01 |
| Monocyte (%) | 6.33 ± 0.15 | 4.01 ± 0.07 | <0.01 |
| Jersey | |||
| Erythrocyte counts (106/ | 5.17 ± 0.13 | 3.81 ± 0.05 | <0.01 |
| Hemoglobin quantity (g/dL) | 12.09 ± 0.93 | 7.97 ± 0.41 | <0.01 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 36.77 ± 2.05 | 28.24 ± 2.75 | <0.01 |
| Leukocyte counts (103/ | 10.07 ± 1.03 | 16.19 ± 1.07 | <0.01 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 21.23 ± 2.19 | 31.29 ± 2.13 | <0.01 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 53.40 ± 2.40 | 37.3 ± 2.3 | <0.01 |
| Monocyte (%) | 5.59 ± 0.31 | 3.97 ± 0.23 | <0.01 |
| Cross-bred | |||
| Erythrocyte counts (106/ | 5.33 ± 0.19 | 3.92 ± 0.11 | <0.01 |
| Hemoglobin quantity (g/dL) | 13.01 ± 1.03 | 8.55 ± 0.33 | <0.01 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 37.13 ± 3.11 | 26.39 ± 3.03 | <0.01 |
| Leukocyte counts (103/ | 12.13 ± 0.91 | 17.03 ± 0.03 | <0.01 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 23.49 ± 3.33 | 39.01 ± 4.51 | <0.01 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 46.91 ± 3.70 | 34.90 ± 3.25 | <0.01 |
| Monocyte (%) | 5.73 ± 0.19 | 3.99 ± 0.03 | <0.01 |
| Friesian | |||
| Erythrocyte counts (106/ | 4.99 ± 0.07 | 3.59 ± 0.11 | <0.01 |
| Hemoglobin quantity (g/dL) | 13.01 ± 0.03 | 9.05 ± 0.29 | <0.01 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 35.03 ± 1.19 | 27.03 ± 1.07 | <0.01 |
| Leukocyte counts (103/ | 11.07 ± 0.07 | 17.01 ± 0.87 | <0.01 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 24.11 ± 1.15 | 39.01 ± 1.01 | <0.01 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 55.11 ± 3.13 | 39.1 ± 3.02 | <0.01 |
| Monocyte (%) | 4.93 ± 0.57 | 3.63 ± 0.29 | <0.01 |
Oxidative stress and antioxidant parameters (mean ± SD) of brucellosis-positive and brucellosis-negative cattle.
| Parameters | Noninfected | Infected |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxidative stress biomarkers | |||
| MDA (nmol/gHb) | 1.54 ± 0.11 | 2.030 ± 0.08 | <0.01 |
| NO scavenging activity (%) | 21.36 ± 0.40 | 28.71 ± 3.50 | <0.001 |
| Antioxidant biomarkers | |||
| SOD (IU/mgHb) | 142.40 ± 9.80 | 121.50 ± 2.10 | <0.01 |
| RGSH (IU/mgHb) | 171.40 ± 7.10 | 151.70 ± 2.60 | <0.001 |
| CAT (IU/mgHb) | 131.30 ± 6.70 | 105.40 ± 2.20 | <0.01 |
Figure 1Total proteins and albumin in brucellosis-negative and brucellosis-positive cattle. Note: the reading (mean ± SD) of total proteins and albumin is significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced in brucellosis-infected cows as compared to noninfected cows.