| Literature DB >> 35898605 |
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine the determinant factors of school-related gender-based violence and its socio-cultural implications for female academic fulfillment in Wolkite town secondary schools. In terms of the research approach, sequential mixed explanatory methods were used. This study took Wolkite secondary schools students and respondents (n = 215). The study results have shown that the most significant socio-cultural determinant factors for school-related gender-based violence resulted from a lack of societal motives to address the problem and gender discriminatory norms bitterly blamed. From this finding, the researcher concluded that the sociocultural practices of the patriarchal ideology that society entertains have a tremendous impact on female students being victimized by gender-based violence and their educational attainment. Policymakers should therefore have significant involvement in school-related gender-based violence.Entities:
Keywords: Educational fulfilments; Sexual assault; Sexual harassment; Socio-cultural influences; Violence against women
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898605 PMCID: PMC9309679 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
The conceptual framework.
| Theme | References | Frameworks | Questions and Tools of Data Collection |
|---|---|---|---|
| The socio-cultural influence on violence against women | The socio-cultural practice that the community entertains has a tremendous effect on the female to be vulnerable by gender- based-violence. | What are the social determinants of school-related gender-based violence? Are household size, religious backgrounds, and the marital status of their demographic backgrounds predict gender-based violence? Survey questionnaire used. The quantitative was then analyzed through Pearson correlation and logistic regression. | |
| The specific traditional forms of violence against women affect the educational attainments of women. | The traditional practice of the community in Ethiopia, such as female genital mutilations and premature marriage, has changed females and people’s attitudes to deteriorate women's education’s relevance. | Are there any correlations between societal traditions along with female educational fulfillments? The survey questionnaire and in-depth interview were used in the techniques of the explanatory sequential mixed method. Pearson correlation and Binary logistic regression were used. | |
| The social and psychological effects on social relationships. | The social and psychological effects are lower academic performances, reduced self-worth, health problem, and mental problem (anxiety and depression) are the most penetrated results. | Are school-related violence have effects on social relationships, and what are these forms of violence? Survey questionnaires and in-depth-interview were used. Besides, the researcher used the descriptive-analytical method in the form of an explanatory sequential mixed process. Here, the data gained from interviewees was triangulated to redouble the quantitative arguments. |
Figure 1Conceptual framework on factors and influence of gender-based violence.
Descriptive statistics on the socio-demographic status of respondents N = 215.
| NO | Socio-demographic backgrounds Variables | Values | Frequency | Percent | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gender | |||||
| Female | 215 | 100% | ||||
| 2 | Age of Respondents | 1.51 | .50 | |||
| 15–19 | 104 | 48.4 | ||||
| 20–24 | 111 | 51.6 | ||||
| 3 | Religious Affiliation | 1.47 | .50 | |||
| Orthodox | 113 | 52.6 | ||||
| Muslim | 102 | 47.4 | ||||
| Total | 215 | 100 | ||||
| 4 | Marital status | 1.69 | .46 | |||
| Never married | 150 | 69.8 | ||||
| Married | 65 | 30.2 | ||||
| 5 | Household size | 3.19 | .90 | |||
| 2–3 | 16 | 7.4 | ||||
| 4–5 | 23 | 10.7 | ||||
| 6–7 | 80 | 37.2 | ||||
| Above 7 | 96 | 44.7 | ||||
| 6 | Level of Education | 9th grade | 33 | 32.4 | 1.68 | .47 |
| 10th grade | 69 | 67.6 | ||||
| 7 | Educational performance | 1.5349 | .66 | |||
| Good and overhead | 120 | 55.8 | ||||
| Normal | 75 | 34.9 | ||||
| Poor | 20 | 9.3 | ||||
| 8 | Place of residence | 1.72 | .44 | |||
| Urban resident | 59 | 27.4 |
Table Logistic regression analysis on the determinant factors for gender-based violence with demographic variables and sociocultural facets. n = 215.
| Respondents | Values | UOR | 95% C.I. for UOR | AOR | 95% C.I. for AOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper | Lower | Upper | Lower | |||||
| Household size | 1 (ref) | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||
| 2–3 | 0.77 | [0.56, 0.94] | 1.36 | [.11, 1.57] | 0.00∗∗ | |||
| 4–5 | 1.21 | [0.98, 1.34] | 1.50 | [.20, 1.80] | 0.05∗ | |||
| 6–7 | 2.44 | [2.03, 2.68] | 2.36 | [.18, .19] | 0.00∗∗ | |||
| Above 7 | 3.76 | [3.35, 5.01] | 3.85 | [3.67, 4.35] | 0.00∗∗ | |||
| Religious Affiliations | Orthodox | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||
| Muslims | 0.49 | [0.47, 0.57] | 0.44 | [0.37, 0.65] | 0.00∗∗ | |||
| Protestant | 1.75 | [1.10, 2.76] | 1.49 | [0.47, 0.57] | 0.01∗ | |||
| Marital status | Never-married | 2.78 | [2.65, 2.99] | 3.85 | [3.67, 4.35] | 0.00∗∗ | ||
| Married | 0.24 | [0.21, 0.21] | 0.33 | [0.29, 0.41 | 0.02∗ | |||
| Divorced (ref) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Level of Educations | 9th grade | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||
| 10th grade | 2.11 | [0.99, 2.3] | 2.17 | [2.01, 3.25] | 0.02∗∗ | |||
| Educational performance | Good and overhead | 2.18 | [1.26, 3.77] | 1.75 | [1.10, 2.76] | 0.00∗∗ | ||
| Normal | 3.30 | [0.62, 17.51] | 3.30 | [0.62, 17.51] | 0.02∗ | |||
| Poor | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Place of residence | Urban resident | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||
| Rural resident (in the periphery) | 2.00 | [1.89, 2.33] | 2.02 | [1.08, 3.79] | 0.00∗∗ | |||
| Patriarchal ideology and forms of GBV | Women lack resistance | 2.13 | [1.17, 3.88] | 2.32 | [.22, .29] | 0.00∗∗ | ||
| Lack of societal motive to address male supremacy | 6.10 | [2.49, 14.93] | 4.00 | [.27, .56] | 0.05∗ | |||
| Early marriage | 2.24 | [1.52, 3.31] | 2.11 | [0.99, 2.34] | 0.00∗∗ | |||
| Domestic violence | 3.01 | [1.89, 4.79] | 3.00 | [1.98, 3.45] | 0.00∗∗ | |||
| School factors | Sexual harassment was perpetrated by the male student. | 4.16 | [0.93, 18.54] | 4.47 | [4.04, 4.77] | 0.00∗∗ | ||
Ref = Reference category; CI = confidence interval; ∗p < .05. ∗∗p < .01.
The correlation between the educational level and cosmopolitanisms.
| Educational level | Male dominance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational level | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .45∗ |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .002 | ||
| N | 215 | 215 | |
| Male dominance (based on the number of male children in the households) | Pearson Correlation | .45∗ | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .002 | ||
| N | 215 | 215 | |
∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The correlation between the Educational level and GBV Domineering attitude of their families, n = 215.
| Educational level | The domineering attitude of their families to promote GBV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational level | Pearson Correlation | 1 | −.24∗ |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .047 | ||
| N | 215 | 215 | |
| The domineering eattitude of their families to promote GBV | Pearson Correlation | −.24∗ | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .047 | ||
| N | 215 | 215 | |
The results in Table 4 indicate that there is a negative correlation between respondent Educational level and the domineering attitude of their families to promote GBV r = −.24∗, P = 0.4, with respondents' educational level (students from grades 9 and 10), explaining 5.9% of the variation in creating the domineering attitude in promoting gender-based violence.
∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The correlation between educational level and household income.
| Educational level | Household income | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational level | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .32∗ |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .03 | ||
| N | 215 | 215 | |
| Household income | Pearson Correlation | .32∗ | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .03 | ||
| N | 215 | 215 | |
∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Effects of School-related violence on social relationships and forms of gender-based violence.
| Observed | Yes (%) | No (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Have you ever been faced with unwelcome Touch sexually? | 75 (73.5) | 27 (26.5) |
| Have you ever been forced to have sex that you have escaped? | 44 (43.1) | 58 (56.9) |
| Have you ever been slapped or thrown something at you that could injure you? | 18 (17.6) | 84 (82.4) |
| Have you ever been Pushed or Shoved? | 58 (56.9) | 44 (43.1) |
| Have you ever been Kicked or Dragged? | 9 (8.8) | 93 (91.2) |
| Have you ever been threatened verbally or actually by using a firearm, knife, or other weapons alongside you? | 72 (70.6) | 30 (29.4) |
| Have you faced the issue of underestimation based on your femininity? | 47 (46.1) | 55 (53.9) |
| Have you faced Rejection from male perpetrators? | 71 (69.6) | 31 (30.4) |
| Have you ever been Alcohol dependency/abuse based on gender-based Violence | 23 (22.5) | 79 (77.5) |