| Literature DB >> 35898602 |
Abstract
Objective: Total hysterectomy (TH) is becoming more and more common in clinical practice, and many patients suffer from postoperative complications such as pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). How to prevent and treat PFD is an important part of the current clinical work, and it is important to improve patients' postoperative quality of life. This study was to investigate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) combined with estriol on PFD after TH in perimenopause.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898602 PMCID: PMC9314174 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6962542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.664
General information of patients.
| Items | PLMT+RT group ( | CT group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 49.36 ± 4.56 | 48.17 ± 4.15 | 1.33 | 0.19 |
| Number of deliveries | 1.79 ± 0.54 | 1.81 ± 0.49 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Primary diseases | ||||
| Hysteromyoma | 26 (53.06%) | 25 (54.35%) | 0.16 | 0.90 |
| Uterine adenomyoma | 10 (20.41%) | 9 (19.57%) | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia | 8 (16.33%) | 9 (19.57%) | 0.17 | 0.68 |
| Abnormal uterine bleeding | 5 (10.20%) | 3 (6.52%) | 0.08 | 0.78 |
| Type of hysterectomy | ||||
| Total hysterectomy+adnexectomy | 4 (8.16%) | 3 (6.52%) | 0.05 | 0.83 |
| Total hysterectomy | 2 (4.08%) | 2 (4.35%) | 0.04 | 0.76 |
PLMT+RT group: pelvic floor muscle training+estriol therapy group; CT group: conventional treatment group.
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle tension between the two groups.
| Group | Case ( | Vaginal systolic pressure (cmH2O) | Vaginal resting pressure (cmH2O) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| CT group | 46 | 27.15 ± 6.59 | 36.17 ± 5.69∗ | 24.10 ± 4.28 | 30.07 ± 5.69∗ |
| PFMT+ET group | 49 | 27.47 ± 6.12 | 44.19 ± 5.27∗ | 24.53 ± 4.47 | 38.85 ± 6.21∗ |
|
| 0.127 | 8.989 | 0.045 | 7.936 | |
|
| 0.789 | ≤0.001 | 0.921 | ≤0.001 | |
Data was mean ± SD. ∗ indicated the paired t-test before and after treatment. P value: PFMT+ET group vs. CT group. PLMT+RT group: pelvic floor muscle training+estriol therapy group; CT group: conventional treatment group.
Comparison of the sexual function indices of the two groups of pre- and posttreatment (scores).
| Group |
| Pain | Satisfaction | Orgasm | Lubrication | Sexual arousal | Sexual desire | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||
| CT group | 46 | 2.15 ± 1.67 | 4.31 ± 1.08∗ | 1.12 ± 1.29 | 3.45 ± 1.58∗ | 1.58 ± 0.96 | 2.84 ± 0.89∗ | 3.26 ± 1.63 | 4.01 ± 1.05∗ | 0.89 ± 0.42 | 3.03 ± 1.67∗ | 0.64 ± 0.25 | 2.85 ± 1.14∗ | 9.56 ± 4.29 | 19.54 ± 6.17∗ |
| PFMT+ET group | 49 | 2.20 ± 1.54 | 5.67 ± 1.21∗ | 1.15 ± 1.33 | 5.12 ± 1.14∗ | 1.49 ± 0.87 | 4.12 ± 1.14∗ | 3.34 ± 1.72 | 4.13 ± 1.14∗ | 1.85 ± 0.46 | 3.89 ± 1.24∗ | 0.73 ± 0.28 | 3.32 ± 1.20∗ | 10.03 ± 5.01 | 25.67 ± 5.67∗ |
|
| 0.234 | 6.125 | 0.117 | 5.783 | 0.059 | 6.621 | 0.067 | 0.056 | 0.122 | 5.814 | 0.456 | 5.237 | 0.064 | 7.951 | |
|
| 0.635 | ≤0.001 | 0.851 | 0.001 | 0.842 | ≤0.001 | 0.741 | 0.789 | 0.806 | 0.002 | 0.665 | 0.001 | 0.679 | ≤0.001 | |
Data was mean ± SD. ∗ indicated the paired t-test before and after treatment. P value: PFMT+ET group vs. CT group.
Comparison of the degree of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction between the two groups after the intervention.
| Group |
| Persistent time of vaginal muscle contraction (h) | Urinary leakage in 1-hour pad test (g) | Residual urine volume (mL) | Frequency of urinary incontinence (time/d) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||
| CT group | 46 | 4.89 ± 2.13 | 6.25 ± 3.14∗ | 42.31 ± 8.69 | 22.07 ± 5.69∗ | 246.39 ± 26.58 | 196.67 ± 21.17∗ | 3.35 ± 0.89 | 2.14 ± 0.56∗ |
| PFMT+ET group | 49 | 5.02 ± 2.25 | 8.97 ± 4.12∗ | 44.30 ± 9.54 | 8.74 ± 2.14∗ | 251.19 ± 25.50 | 52.69 ± 8.97∗ | 3.26 ± 0.74 | 0.87 ± 0.42∗ |
|
| 0.246 | 6.374 | 0.157 | 9.531 | 1.023 | 12.207 | 0.039 | 6.573 | |
|
| 0.641 | ≤0.001 | 0.658 | ≤0.001 | 0.962 | ≤0.001 | 0.861 | ≤0.001 | |
Data was mean ± SD. ∗ indicated the paired t-test before and after treatment. P value: PFMT+ET group vs. CT group.