| Literature DB >> 35898348 |
Paula D Strassle, Alan C Kinlaw, Jamie S Ko, Stephanie M Quintero, Jackie Bonilla, Madison Ponder, Anna María Nápoles, Sharon E Schiro.
Abstract
Background: To combat the coronavirus pandemic, states implemented several public health policies to reduce infection and transmission. Increasing evidence suggests that these prevention strategies also have had a profound impact on non-COVID healthcare utilization. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of a statewide Stay-at-Home and other COVID-related policies on trauma hospitalizations, stratified by race/ethnicity, age, and sex.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898348 PMCID: PMC9327631 DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.11.22277511
Source DB: PubMed Journal: medRxiv
Demographics and clinical characteristics of trauma hospitalizations captured in the North Carolina Trauma Registry between 2019 and 2020, stratified by year.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | SD[ | |
|
| 35,616 | 34,862 | - |
|
| 54 (28, 74) | 53 (29, 74) | 0.01 |
|
| |||
| 0–17 | 3,898 (10.9) | 3,468 (9.9) | 0.03 |
| 18–44 | 10,659 (29.9) | 11,061 (31.7) | 0.04 |
| 45–64 | 7,618 (21.4) | 7,413 (21.3) | 0.00 |
| ≥65 | 13,441 (37.7) | 12,920 (37.1) | 0.01 |
|
| 20,474 (57.5) | 20,569 (59.0) | 0.03 |
|
| |||
| American Indian | 234 (0.7) | 279 (0.8) | 0.02 |
| Asian | 332 (0.9) | 264 (0.8) | 0.02 |
| Black/African American | 7,516 (21.3) | 7,888 (22.9) | 0.04 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 2,005 (5.7) | 2,062 (6.0) | 0.01 |
| White | 24,497 (69.6) | 23,352 (67.7) | 0.04 |
| Other[ | 526 (1.5) | 522 (1.5) | 0.00 |
| Multiracial | 94 (0.3) | 108 (0.3) | 0.00 |
| | 412 | 387 | - |
|
| |||
| Any private insurance | 10,862 (30.5) | 9,954 (28.6) | 0.04 |
| Medicare/Medicaid only | 16,010 (45.0) | 15,785 (45.4) | 0.01 |
| Self-pay | 5,629 (15.8) | 5,981 (17.2) | 0.04 |
| Other[ | 3,061 (8.6) | 3,066 (8.8) | 0.01 |
|
| 10,578 (31.2) | 9,323 (29.7) | 0.03 |
|
| 9 (4, 11) | 9 (4, 13) | 0.03 |
|
| |||
| Assault | 3,253 (9.3) | 3,565 (10.4) | 0.04 |
| Self-inflicted | 434 (1.2) | 413 (1.2) | 0.00 |
| Unintentional | 31,223 (89.4) | 30,168 (88.4) | 0.03 |
| MVC[ | 10,116 (29.0) | 9,817 (28.8) | 0.01 |
| Non-MVC | 21,107 (60.5) | 20,351 (59.6) | 0.02 |
| Undetermined | 706 | 716 | - |
|
| 4.5 (2.8, 6.8) | 4.6 (2.8, 7.2) | 0.09 |
|
| 3 (1, 6) | 3 (1, 6) | 0.03 |
|
| 2 (1, 4) | 2 (0, 4) | 0.01 |
|
| |||
| Routine/home | 22,902 (65.6) | 23,324 (68.7) | 0.06 |
| Longterm care[ | 8,865 (25.4) | 7,488 (22.0) | 0.00 |
| Transferred[ | 1,878 (5.4) | 1,815 (5.3) | 0.08 |
| Died | 1,260 (3.6) | 1,345 (4.0) | 0.02 |
| | 711 | 890 | - |
|
| |||
| Confirmed | N/A | 354 (1.0) | - |
| Suspected | N/A | 5,543 (15.9) | - |
Abbreviations: SD, standardized difference; med, median; IQR, interquartile range; ISS, injury severity score; MVC, motor-vehicle collisions; ED, emergency department; LOS, length of stay; ICU, intensive care unit
Absolute standardized difference (SD) comparing demographics and clinical characteristics between 2019 and 2020; an SD >0.20 was considered meaningfully different
Other race includes Other race and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander; race was collapsed due to small cell sizes
Other insurance types include worker’s compensation, other government insurance, Champus, and not billed
Include all MVC-related (e.g., MVC-bicyclist, MVC-pedestrian), motorcyclist, and other transport accidents
Among those admitted to ICU (n=20,827)
Long-term care includes: hospice, long-term care facility, nursing home, rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility (SNF)
Transfers to: acute care facilities, burn center, mental health facility, other trauma center, and transferred (unspecified)
Includes individuals who left against medical advice (n=559)
Figure 1.Overall impact of COVID-19 executive orders on weekly number of trauma admissions to trauma centers for A) intentional and B) unintentional injuries between January 2019 and December 2020 in North Carolina. The black lines represent the timing of the four executive orders assessed in the analyses (US declares public health emergency, North Carolina statewide Stay-at-Home order, statewide Phase 2: Safer-at-Home order, and statewide Phase 2.5: Safer-at-Home order); grey lines represent the time of the other COVID-related executive orders.
Figure 2.Impact of COVID-19 executive orders on weekly number of assault admissions to trauma centers between January 2019 and December 2020 in North Carolina, stratified by A) race/ethnicity, B) age group among females, and C) age group among males. The black lines represent the timing of the four executive orders assessed in the analyses (US declares public health emergency, North Carolina statewide Stay-at-Home order, statewide Phase 2: Safer-at-Home order, and statewide Phase 2.5: Safer-at-Home order); grey lines represent the time of the other COVID-related executive orders.
Figure 3.Impact of COVID-19 executive orders on weekly number of unintentional MVC admissions to trauma centers between January 2019 and December 2020 in North Carolina, stratified by A) race/ethnicity, B) age group among females, and C) age group among males. The black lines represent the timing of the four executive orders assessed in the analyses (US declares public health emergency, North Carolina statewide Stay-at-Home order, statewide Phase 2: Safer-at-Home order, and statewide Phase 2.5: Safer-at-Home order); grey lines represent the time of the other COVID-related executive orders.
Figure 4.Impact of COVID-19 executive orders on weekly number of unintentional non-MVC admissions to trauma centers between January 2019 and December 2020 in North Carolina, stratified by A) race/ethnicity, B) age group among females, and C) age group among males. The black lines represent the timing of the four executive orders assessed in the analyses (US declares public health emergency, North Carolina statewide Stay-at-Home order, statewide Phase 2: Safer-at-Home order, and statewide Phase 2.5: Safer-at-Home order); grey lines represent the time of the other COVID-related executive orders.