| Literature DB >> 35898046 |
Abstract
Array pattern synthesis (APS) aims to create the desired array pattern as closely as possible to the prescribed mask template by varying the element excitations of the array. Herein, an efficient approach for the APS to control the sidelobe level is proposed. After designing the mask template to meet the prescribed sidelobe requirements and the waveform pattern, a set of element excitations is calculated through the Fourier transform performed on the projection the waveform pattern onto the mask template. Then, a desired array pattern can be synthesized from this updated set of excitation coefficients. The proposed APS approach directly presents a mathematical formulation of the exact set of excitations without any iterative optimization process. The proposed method is particularly suited for many array elements in linear antenna array. Thus, the proposed APS achieves substantial improvements in terms of computation complexity, performance, and ease of implementation in the algorithm when compared with conventional methods. Several simulation results are provided to verify the efficacy and effectiveness of the proposed method.Entities:
Keywords: array pattern synthesis; mask template; phased arrays antenna; waveform pattern
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898046 PMCID: PMC9331809 DOI: 10.3390/s22155537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Overall flowchart of the proposed approach for APS.
Figure 2(a) Designed mask template in dB scale; (b) Designed mask template in linear scale; (c) Designed waveform pattern; (d) A set of element excitations calculated using (c,b) with respect to both amplitude (blue) and phase (orange); (e) The desired AF synthesized by a set of element ex-citations of (d); (f) The desired AF synthesis steered towards 20 degrees in the presence of defec-tive elements.
Figure 3Desired AFs synthesized with K = 300 array elements for desired beamwidth (rad), and the comparison between the proposed method and optimization techniques; (a) Full angle range; (b) Sector beam patterns.
Figure 4(a) HPBW error calculated as the absolute value of the difference between synthesized and desired HPBWs; (b) Percentage of power radiated by each APS technique in the mainlobe region; (c) Average computation times (on a semilogarithmic scale) required to synthesize desired AF with beamwidth (rad) versus the number of array elements for each APS technique.