| Literature DB >> 35897671 |
Júlia Faura1, Laura Ramiro1, Alba Simats1, Feifei Ma1, Anna Penalba1, Teresa Gasull2, Anna Rosell1, Joan Montaner1,3,4, Alejandro Bustamante1,5.
Abstract
After stroke and other brain injuries, there is a high incidence of respiratory complications such as pneumonia or acute lung injury. The molecular mechanisms that drive the brain-lung interaction post-stroke have not yet been elucidated. We performed transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and sham surgery on C57BL/6J mice and collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), serum, brain, and lung homogenate samples 24 h after surgery. A 92 proteins-panel developed by Olink Proteomics® was used to analyze the content in BALF and lung homogenates. MCAO animals had higher protein concentration levels in BALF than sham-controls, but these levels did not correlate with the infarct volume. No alteration in alveolar-capillary barrier permeability was observed. A total of 12 and 14 proteins were differentially expressed between the groups (FDR < 0.1) in BALF and lung tissue homogenates, respectively. Of those, HGF, TGF-α, and CCL2 were identified as the most relevant to this study. Their protein expression patterns were verified by ELISA. This study confirmed that post-stroke lung damage was not associated with increased lung permeability or cerebral ischemia severity. Furthermore, the dysregulation of HGF, TGF-α, and CCL2 in BALF and lung tissue after ischemia could play an important role in the molecular mechanisms underlying stroke-induced lung damage.Entities:
Keywords: inflammation; pulmonary complications; stroke
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897671 PMCID: PMC9329771 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Evaluation of the protein concentration in BALF. (A) Boxplot comparing the BALF protein concentration between ischemic and sham mice (N = 53) (B) Scatter plot representing the BALF protein concentration (X axis) and the infarct volume (Y axis) of the ischemic animals (N = 42). (C) Two representative images of cerebral ischemia measured by TTC staining. The boxplot in (A) shows increased protein concentration in MCAO animals compared to sham, while the scatterplot in B showed the lack of correlation between infarct volume and protein concentration. MCAO: middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Top table of BALF (left) and lung homogenate (right) protein expression. Significant proteins are shown. The p-value column corresponds to the unadjusted p-value. logFC: logarithmic fold-change, FDR: false discovery ratio.
| BALF | Lung Homogenate | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | logFC | FDR | Uniprot Code | Protein | logFC | FDR | Uniprot Code | ||
| Hepatocyte growth factor | 0.740 | >0.001 | 0.002 | Q08048 | Protransforming growth factor alpha | 1.296 | >0.001 | >0.001 | P48030 |
| NAD kinase | 1.237 | >0.001 | 0.002 | P58058 | C-C motif chemokine 2 | 1.115 | >0.001 | >0.001 | P10148 |
| Protein phosphatase inhibitor 2 | 0.873 | >0.001 | 0.005 | Q9DCL8 | N(G),N(G)-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 | 0.392 | 0.001 | 0.010 | Q9CWS0 |
| Caspase-3 | 1.209 | >0.001 | 0.005 | P70677 | Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 | 0.891 | 0.001 | 0.010 | P11103 |
| CNN family member 1 | 0.767 | 0.001 | 0.006 | P18406 | Calsyntenin-2 | 0.691 | 0.001 | 0.011 | Q9ER65 |
| Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor | 0.609 | 0.001 | 0.006 | P48540 | Integrin beta-1-binding protein 2 | −0.873 | 0.002 | 0.026 | Q9R000 |
| Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6 | 0.524 | 0.001 | 0.006 | P25446 | Interleukin-1 alpha | −0.928 | 0.003 | 0.029 | P01582 |
| Integrin beta-6 | 0.573 | 0.002 | 0.015 | Q9Z0T9 | Peroxiredoxin-5 | 0.510 | 0.004 | 0.033 | P99029 |
| Peroxiredoxin-5 | 0.897 | 0.007 | 0.030 | P99029 | Disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 23 | 0.182 | 0.008 | 0.063 | Q9R1V7 |
| Synaptosomal-associated protein 29 | 1.007 | 0.007 | 0.030 | Q9ERB0 | Growth-regulated alpha protein | 1.600 | 0.008 | 0.063 | P12850 |
| Dihydropteridine reductase | 0.634 | 0.007 | 0.030 | Q8BVI4 | Follistatin | 0.333 | 0.015 | 0.096 | P47931 |
| Legumain | 0.554 | 0.007 | 0.030 | O89017 | Matrilin-2 | −0.441 | 0.017 | 0.096 | O08746 |
| NAD kinase | −0.256 | 0.017 | 0.096 | P58058 | |||||
| Transforming growth factor beta-1 proprotein | 0.618 | 0.018 | 0.096 | P04202 | |||||
Figure 2Volcano plot of significant proteins in the BALF (A) and lung (B) analyses of ischemic vs. sham animals. The X-axis represents the logFC and the Y-represents the logarithm in base 10 of the False Discovery Ratio (FDR). The horizontal line symbolizes an FDR < 0.1 and the vertical lines symbolize an FDR > |0.25|. Proteins over or under the mentioned cut-off points for FDR and FC represent the differentially expressed proteins and are marked in brown. A total of 12 proteins (BALF) and 14 (lung) showed differential expression between ischemic and sham animals. LogFC: logarithmic fold-change, FDR: false discovery ratio.
Figure 3HGF, CCL2 and TGF-α measurements by ELISA. (A) Boxplot comparing HGF levels in BALF of MCAO vs. sham mice (N = 49) (B) Dotplot representing HGF measurement by Olink® panel (X-axis) and measurement by ELISA (Y axis) (N = 53). (C) Boxplot comparing CCL2 levels in lung of MCAO vs. sham mice (N = 30) (D) Dot plot representing CCL2 measurement by Olink® panel (X axis) and ELISA measurement (Y axis) (N = 30). (E) Boxplot comparing TGF-α levels in lung of MCAO vs. sham mice (N = 30) (F) Dot plot representing TGF-α measurement by the Olink® panel (X axis) and ELISA measurement (Y axis) (N = 30). The boxplots showed increased HGF, a trend towards increased CCL2 and decreased TGF-a values in MCAO vs. sham animals, while the scatterplots showed positive correlations for HGF and CCL2 and a negative correlation for TGF-a. HGF: Hepatocyte Growth Factor, CCL2: C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2, TGF-α: Transforming Growth Factor α, ELISA: Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay, BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, NPX: normalized protein expression, MCAO: middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Figure 4Lung permeability assessment. (A) Bar plot representing the ratio between BALF and serum fluorescence (N = 7 vs. 5). (B) Bar plot representing the amount of fluorescence of the tissue, adjusted by the weight of each organ (N = 7 vs. 5). For both comparisons, no significant differences were noted between MCAO and sham animals. BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; OD, optical density.