| Literature DB >> 35897430 |
Junting Guo1,2, Quansheng Li1, Huizhen Xie3, Jun Li3, Linwei Qiao3, Chengye Zhang3, Guozhu Yang4, Fei Wang1,2.
Abstract
Overstocked dumping sites associated with open-pit coal mining occupy original vegetation areas and cause damage to the environment. The monitoring of vegetation disturbance and restoration at dumping sites is important for the accurate planning of ecological restoration in mining areas. This paper aimed to monitor and assess vegetation disturbance and restoration in the dumping sites of the Baorixile open-pit mine using the LandTrendr algorithm and remote sensing images. Firstly, based on the temporal datasets of Landsat from 1990 to 2021, the boundaries of the dumping sites in the Baorixile open-pit mine in Hulunbuir city were extracted. Secondly, the LandTrendr algorithm was used to identify the initial time and duration of vegetation disturbance and restoration, while the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was used as the input parameter for the LandTrendr algorithm. Thirdly, the vegetation restoration effect at the dumping sites was monitored and analyzed from both temporal and spatial perspectives. The results showed that the dumping sites of the Baorixile open-pit mine were disturbed sharply by the mining activities. The North dumping site, the South dumping site, and the East dumping site (hereinafter referred to as the North site, the South site, and the East site) were established in 1999, 2006, and 2010, respectively. The restored areas were mainly concentrated in the South site, the East site, and the northwest of the North site. The average restoration intensity in the North site, South site, and East site was 0.515, 0.489, and 0.451, respectively, and the average disturbance intensity was 0.371, 0.398, and 0.320, respectively. The average restoration intensity in the three dumping sites was greater than the average disturbance intensity. This study demonstrates that the combination of temporal remote sensing images and the LandTrendr algorithm can follow the vegetation restoration process of an open-pit mine clearly and can be used to monitor the progress and quality of ecological restoration projects such as vegetation restoration in mining areas. It provides important data and support for accurate ecological restoration in mining areas.Entities:
Keywords: LandTrendr; dumping site; open-pit mine; vegetation restoration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897430 PMCID: PMC9332278 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Location of the study area.
Band information of the images used for calculating the NDVI.
| Satellite | Band Number | Band Name | Wavelength (μm) | Spatial Resolution (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landsat 5 | Band 3 | Red | 0.63–0.69 | 30 |
| Band 4 | Near-infrared | 0.76–0.90 | 30 | |
| Landsat 7 | Band 3 | Red | 0.63–0.69 | 30 |
| Band 4 | Near-infrared | 0.76–0.90 | 30 | |
| Landsat 8 | Band 4 | Red | 0.64–0.67 | 30 |
| Band 5 | Near-infrared | 0.85–0.88 | 30 |
Figure 2Process of monitoring and assessing the vegetation disturbance and restoration.
Figure 3Vegetation disturbance and restoration process of open-pit mines.
LandTrendr parameters (Quote from LT-GEE Guide).
| Parameter | Definition | Default |
|---|---|---|
| maxSegments | Maximum number of segments fitted on a time series. | - |
| spikeThreshold | Threshold for dampening the vertices of the time series (1.0 means no dampening). | 0.9 |
| vertexCountOvershoot | Initial regression-based monitoring of potential vertices can make vertices more than (maxSegments + 1). The value may be outside this range. If exceeded, angle-based culling can be used to return to the desired number of vertices. Allows a mixture of methods for vertex recognition. | 3 |
| preventOneYearRecovery | Prevent recovery events that take only one year to complete. | False |
| recoveryThreshold | If the recovery rate of the recovery segment in the time series is higher than 1/recoveryThreshold (in years), the segment is not allowed, and segments with different thresholds must be used. | 0.25 |
| pvalThreshold | If the | 0.1 |
| bestModelProportion | When selecting the optimal model, the difference between the | 1.25 |
| minObservationsNeeded | The minimum observations required to output the fitted values. | 6 |
| TimeSeries | Collection of remote sensing images used to extract trajectory trends. | 1990–2021 |
Figure 4Results of the boundary extraction for the dumping sites from 2000 to 2021.
Figure 5Expansion directions (red arrows). (a) North site; (b) East site; (c) South site.
Figure 6Areas of North site, South site, and East site.
Figure 7NDVI variation from 2000 to 2021.
Figure 8Initial time of vegetation disturbance and restoration. (a) Initial time of disturbance; (b) Initial time of restoration.
Figure 9Pixel statistics of disturbance and restoration initial time. (a) East site; (b) South site; (c) North site.
Figure 10Duration of vegetation disturbance and restoration. (a) Duration of disturbance; (b) Duration of restoration.
Duration of the disturbance.
| Duration of Disturbance (Years) | Number of Pixels | Area (hm2) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| North site | 1 | 6007 | 360.42 |
| 2 | 2171 | 130.26 | |
| 3 | 721 | 43.26 | |
| South site | 1 | 295 | 17.7 |
| 2 | 135 | 8.1 | |
| 3 | 3 | 0.18 | |
| East site | 1 | 1660 | 99.6 |
| 2 | 476 | 28.56 | |
| 3 | 76 | 4.56 |
Duration of restoration.
| Duration of Restoration (Year) | Number of Pixels | Area (hm2) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| North site | 1–2 | 1518 | 91.08 |
| 3–5 | 1554 | 93.24 | |
| 6–8 | 1187 | 71.22 | |
| >8 | 3678 | 220.68 | |
| South site | 1–2 | 16 | 0.96 |
| 3–5 | 122 | 7.32 | |
| 6–8 | 83 | 4.98 | |
| >8 | 188 | 11.28 | |
| East site | 1–2 | 306 | 18.36 |
| 3–5 | 740 | 44.4 | |
| 6–8 | 190 | 11.4 | |
| >8 | 1548 | 92.88 |
Figure 11Intensity of disturbance and restoration of the vegetation. (a) Intensity of the disturbance; (b) Intensity of restoration.
Average intensity of disturbance and restoration of the vegetation.
| Average Intensity of Disturbance | Average Intensity of Restoration | |
|---|---|---|
| North site | 0.371 | 0.515 |
| East site | 0.320 | 0.415 |
| South site | 0.398 | 0.489 |