| Literature DB >> 35897429 |
Keli Yang1,2, Yaoling Zhang1,3, Yaping Dong1,2, Jiaoyu Peng1,2, Wu Li1,3, Haining Liu1,3.
Abstract
The abundance and chemical composition of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the brine of solar ponds affect the efficiency of mineral extraction and evaporation rates of the brine, and cause undesired odor and color of the products. Here, we report an investigation into the composition and changes of DOM in solar ponds from Salt Lake brine with multiple complementary analysis techniques. The results showed that the DOM derived from Salt Lake brine was primarily composed of carbohydrates, aliphatic and aromatic compounds. The concentrations of dissolved organic carbon in solar ponds increased with exposure time by up to 15-fold (from 23.4 to 330.8 mg/L) upon evaporation/irradiation of Salt Lake brine. Further qualitative analyses suggest that the relative abundance of aliphatic compounds (including functionalized ones) increased from 49.5% to 59.2% in the solar pond process, while the opposite was observed for carboxylic acid moieties, aromatics and carbohydrates, which decreased from 15.7%, 7.1% and 26.1% to 13.4%, 5.3% and 23.0%, respectively. The pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry results reveal that the presence of some sulfur-containing organics implied some anaerobic biotic decay, but microbiological processes were probably subordinate to photo-induced DOM transformations. In the Salt Lake brine, exposure-driven decay decreased the abundance of polysaccharides and increased that of mono- and polyaromatic pyrolysis products. Our results here provide new insights for better understanding the changes of DOM chemical composition in the solar ponds of Salt Lake brine.Entities:
Keywords: Salt Lake brine; chemical composition; evaporation; mineral extraction; transformations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897429 PMCID: PMC9331927 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The map of the study area.
Figure 2Scheme for the solar pond from Salt Lake brine.
Variations in physical properties and chemical compositions of the studied Salt Lake brine samples in the solar pond process.
| Sample | pH | TDS (g/L) | DIC (mg/L) | DOC (mg/L) | TN (mg/L) | Major Ions (g/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cl− | SO42− | B2O3 | K+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | Li+ | ||||||
| SIP | 7.4 | 273.5 | 33.6 | 23.4 | 6.6 | 107.8 | 26.2 | 0.6 | 4.1 | 15.0 | 119.8 | 0.1 |
| SSP | 7.2 | 290.6 | 40.9 | 28.1 | 7.0 | 110.5 | 36.7 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 18.4 | 117.1 | 0.1 |
| SRP | 6.6 | 326.9 | 16.4 | 68.8 | 18.1 | 128.9 | 60.3 | 7.4 | 11.7 | 47.2 | 71.1 | 0.3 |
| SCP | 4.6 | 353.5 | 8.3 | 198.3 | 45.1 | 180.6 | 12.1 | 18.3 | 0.8 | 108.3 | 31.9 | 1.5 |
| SBP | 4.6 | 479.6 | 18.5 | 330.8 | 85.5 | 277.1 | 18.6 | 40.1 | 0.5 | 114.9 | 25.5 | 3.0 |
Elemental composition, atomic ratios and stable isotopic analysis of DOM samples.
| Sample | Mass% | Atomic Ratio | δ13C‰ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C% | H% | N% | O% | H/C | C/N | O/C | ||
| SIP | 41.6 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 52.4 | 1.1 | 22.7 | 1.0 | −21.8 |
| SSP | 42.6 | 4.2 | 2.4 | 50.8 | 1.2 | 20.9 | 0.9 | −21.0 |
| SRP | 37.1 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 56.2 | 1.5 | 22.4 | 1.1 | −21.7 |
| SCP | 53.5 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 39.2 | 1.1 | 27.6 | 0.6 | −21.4 |
| SBP | 47.5 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 45.5 | 1.3 | 30.1 | 0.7 | −22.2 |
Figure 3The FTIR spectra of DOM samples isolated from the solar pond process (a), and their corresponding second derivative spectra (b).
Figure 413C NMR spectra of DOM samples.
The relative carbon percentage of DOM functional groups and compound classes (total aliphatic and total aromatic) obtained from 13C NMR spectra.
| Chemical Shift, ppm | 0–45 | 45–65 | Total | 65–110 | 110–145 | 145–160 | Total | 160–190 | 190–220 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structural Category | Alkyl C | Methoxyl/N-alkyl C | Aliphatic | O-alkyl C | Aromatic C | Aromatic C–O | Aromatics | Carboxyl/Amide C | Ketones, |
| SIP | 33.5 | 15.9 | 49.5 | 26.1 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 15.7 | 1.7 |
| SSP | 35.8 | 15.9 | 51.7 | 26.2 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 5.6 | 15.6 | 1.0 |
| SRP | 36.8 | 16.5 | 53.2 | 23.3 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 6.2 | 16.0 | 1.3 |
| SCP | 43.1 | 16.3 | 59.3 | 21.7 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 5.6 | 12.6 | 0.7 |
| SBP | 40.5 | 16.8 | 57.2 | 23.0 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 5.3 | 13.4 | 1.0 |
Pyrolysis product groups and relative proportions (%) of the DOM samples analyzed.
| Categories | SIP | SSP | SRP | SCP | SBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALICYCL | 25.81 | 24.99 | 27.39 | 28.08 | 25.62 |
| CARB | 26.88 | 24.87 | 27.59 | 21.60 | 19.92 |
| MAH | 16.79 | 17.52 | 17.61 | 20.05 | 22.54 |
| MCC | 11.57 | 15.69 | 11.21 | 11.51 | 11.22 |
| NCOMP | 1.66 | 1.50 | 1.43 | 1.60 | 1.84 |
| OTHER | 5.52 | 4.89 | 4.96 | 5.57 | 6.20 |
| PAH | 3.68 | 3.85 | 3.65 | 4.94 | 5.95 |
| PHEN | 3.65 | 3.49 | 3.28 | 3.50 | 3.88 |
| SCOMP | 2.19 | 0.76 | 1.18 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| HALOGENCOMP | 1.65 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 1.26 | 1.13 |
| PENT | 0.32 | 0.77 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.32 |
| LIG | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.32 |
Abbreviations: ALICYCL = alicyclic compounds, CARB = carbohydrate, MAH = monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, MCC = methylene chain compound, NCOMP = nitrogen-containing compound, PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, PHEN = phenols, SCOMP = sulfur-containing compound, PENT = pentanedioic acid, LIG = products of lignin and lignin-like phenolics.