| Literature DB >> 35897331 |
Tajneen Affnaan Saleh1, Abdullah Sarwar1, Md Amirul Islam1, Muhammad Mohiuddin2, Zhan Su2.
Abstract
Employees working under conscientious leadership perceive their leaders as ethical leaders. This study investigates the conscientiousness of leaders as an essential trait of ethical leadership and the relationship between ethical leadership and employee-turnover intention. Additionally, we study the potential mediating roles of the individual-level ethical climate (self-interest, friendship, and personal morality) as well as the level of employees' emotional exhaustion that contribute to the decision-making process of turnover intention. Building on social learning and social exchange theories, outcomes from nine industrial manufacturing organizations comprising 260 subordinates' responses show that leaders' conscientiousness is positively related to ethical leadership and negatively associated with employees' turnover intention. Consistent with this hypotheses, results found that, in an individual-level ethical climate, employees experience diminished emotional exhaustion. The relationships are found to mediate between ethical leadership and turnover intention in manufacturing organizations. Additionally, it was also found that individual-level ethical climates cause a relatively positive impact on employees' emotional exhaustion leading them to lower turnover intention.Entities:
Keywords: emotional exhaustion; ethical leadership; individual-type ethical climate; leader conscientiousness; turnover intention
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897331 PMCID: PMC9331309 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19158959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Theoretical model.
Discriminant validity.
| Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional Exhaustion |
| ||||
| Ethical Leadership | −0.278 |
| |||
| Individual-type Ethical Climate | −0.185 | 0.642 |
| ||
| Leader Conscientiousness | −0.061 | 0.369 | 0.387 |
| |
| Turnover Intention | 0.444 | −0.299 | −0.299 | −0.04 |
|
Values on the diagonal (bolded) are square root of the AVE while the off-diagonals are correlations.
Demographic profile of the study (n = 260).
| Variable | Categories | Percentage | Mean | Std. Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 40.4 | 1.60 | 0.492 |
| Female | 59.6 | |||
| Age | Below 25 | 24.6 | 1.23 | 0.863 |
| 26 to 34 | 30.8 | |||
| 35 to 49 | 41.2 | |||
| 50 above | 03.5 | |||
| Highest education level | High School | 10.4 | 1.89 | 1.064 |
| Diploma | 26.9 | |||
| Degree | 30.0 | |||
| Master | 28.5 | |||
| Doctorate | 04.2 | |||
| No. of years under present manager | 2 years or less | 40.2 | 0.82 | 0.839 |
| 2 to 4 years | 40.4 | |||
| 5 to 7 years | 13.8 | |||
| 8 or more | 04.6 |
Reliability and convergent validity of study constructs.
| Variables | Items | Loadings | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leader Conscientiousness | CO1 | 0.832 | 0.745 | 0.601 |
| CO3 | 0.706 | |||
| Emotional Exhaustion | EE1 | 0.767 | 0.861 | 0.611 |
| EE2 | 0.886 | |||
| EE3 | 0.822 | |||
| EE4 | 0.629 | |||
| Individual-type Ethical Climate | EC1 | 0.613 | 0.814 | 0.602 |
| EC4 | 0.559 | |||
| EC5 | 0.446 | |||
| EC6 | 0.597 | |||
| EC7 | 0.475 | |||
| EC8 | 0.786 | |||
| EC9 | 0.826 | |||
| Ethical Leadership | EL1 | 0.799 | 0.902 | 0.711 |
| EL3 | 0.631 | |||
| EL4 | 0.803 | |||
| EL5 | 0.528 | |||
| EL6 | 0.719 | |||
| EL7 | 0.846 | |||
| EL8 | 0.708 | |||
| EL9 | 0.656 | |||
| EL10 | 0.686 | |||
| Turnover Intention | ToI1 | 0.891 | 0.885 | 0.720 |
| ToI2 | 0.800 | |||
| ToI3 | 0.851 |
Discriminant validity based on heterotrait–monotrait (HTMT) criterion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Emotional Exhaustion | |||||
| Ethical Leadership | 0.279 | ||||
| Individual-type Ethical Climate | 0.348 | 0.610 | |||
| Leader Conscientiousness | 0.344 | 0.667 | 0.826 | ||
| Turnover Intention | 0.600 | 0.342 | 0.408 | 0.249 |
Shaded boxes are the standard reporting format for HTMT procedure.
Structural model assessment.
| Hypotheses | Relationship | Std. Beta | Decision |
|
|
| VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Leader Conscientiousness → Ethical Leadership | 0.392 | 8.743 | 0.001 | Supported | 0.138 | 0.157 | 0.062 | 1.247 |
| H2 | Ethical Leadership → Turnover Intention | −0.366 | 7.665 | 0.001 | Supported | 0..325 | 0.008 | 0.168 | 1.411 |
| H3a | Ethical Leadership → Individual-type Ethical Climate | 0.548 | 14.378 | 0.001 | Supported | 0.268 | 0.415 | 0.110 | |
| H3b | Individual-type Ethical Climate → Turnover Intention | −0.351 | 7.812 | 0.001 | Supported | 0.325 | 0.029 | 1.446 | |
| H3c | Ethical Leadership → Individual-type Ethical Climate → Turnover Intention | −0.095 | 2.423 | 0.008 | Supported | ||||
| H4a | Ethical Leadership → Emotional Exhaustion | −0.351 | 9.084 | 0.001 | Supported | 0.079 | 0.049 | 0.037 | |
| H4b | Emotional Exhaustion → Turnover Intention | 0.441 | 8.469 | 0.001 | Supported | 0.325 | 0.183 | 1.047 | |
| H4c | Ethical Leadership → Emotional Exhaustion → Turnover Intention | −0.142 | 5.470 | 0.000 | Supported | ||||
| H5 | Individual-type Ethical Climate → Emotional Exhaustion | −0.397 | 2.277 | 0.011 | Supported | 0.079 | 0.005 |