| Literature DB >> 35897288 |
Swetha Sampathkumar1, Meenakshi Sankar2, Sankar Ramasamy3, Nivedita Sriram4,5, Ponnusamy Saravanan1,6, Uma Ram7.
Abstract
This study aimed to test the feasibility and to identify barriers and facilitators towards adherence of a text messaging intervention for postnatal care in India. Mixed methods research involving both quantitative and qualitative methods were used. A survey questionnaire for feasibility and focus group interviews to identify the barriers and facilitators to the intervention were conducted. The top three reasons for activation of service were: helped the new mother to understand the changes (95%); provided continuation of care (90%) and clarified conflicting information (89%). Over 90% read the messages daily. 80% were happy with the message frequency. About 75% shared the content with others. The main reasons for non-activation were: 30% had technical issues, 15% did not think it would be useful, 17% did not have time to activate and for 5%, husbands made the decision. These findings were triangulated through the qualitative focus groups. The main themes identified via the focus groups were: (1) reliable, current information; (2) issues and themes well aligned with new mothers' needs and priorities; (3) expanded the repertoire of information sources available; and (4) high-quality accessible information. The satisfaction and trust rates were high. This technology may be useful for health information intervention in specific postnatal areas.Entities:
Keywords: SMS intervention; mHealth; maternal health; postnatal care; text messaging intervention
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897288 PMCID: PMC9329952 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19158914
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Study flow.
Characteristics of the study participants.
| Total | Users | Non-Users | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||
| 24 and less | 159 (14.0) | 87(12.8) | 72 (15.8) |
| 25 to 35 | 924 (81.2) | 565(82.8) | 359 (78.7) |
| 36 and above | 55(4.8) | 30(4.4) | 25 (5.5) |
| Parity | |||
| 1 | 635 (55.8) | 389(57.0) | 246(53.9) |
| 2 | 395 (34.7) | 236(34.6) | 159(34.9) |
| 3 | 79 (6.9) | 40(5.9) | 39(8.5) |
| 4 | 21 (1.9) | 13(1.9) | 8(1.8) |
| 5–7 | 8 (0.7) | 4(0.6) | 4(0.9) |
| Complication | |||
| GDM | 279 (24.5) | 175(25.7) | 104(22.8) |
| Hypothyroid | 136 (11.95) | 88(12.9) | 48(10.5) |
| Others (Multiple) | 108 (9.5) | 56(8.2) | 52(11.4) |
| None | 615 (54.05) | 363(53.2) | 252(55.3) |
| Delivery type | |||
| LSCS | 469 (41.2) | 261(38.3) | 208(45.6) |
| Normal Delivery * | 669 (58.8) | 421(61.7) | 248(54.4) |
* p-value < 0.05.
Reasons for engaging in the service (n = 80).
| Why Did You Activate and Take Up This Service? | ||
|---|---|---|
| It was a service offered by the hospital. | 53.16% | 42 |
| It would help me understand what is going on with me and my child. | 73.75% | 59 |
| I expected the information to be reliable. | 29.49% | 23 |
| Such a service would help clarify any doubts I had after I went home. | 42.31% | 33 |
| Having such information would help build my confidence in caring for my newborn. | 35.00% | 28 |
| The information comes to me directly from the hospital. | 25.00% | 20 |
| I would know first-hand what to do and take appropriate action. | 21.05% | 16 |
| Any other please specify. | 15.79% | 3 |
Value and benefits of the service (n = 80).
| Which of the Following Statements Best Describe Your Experience of the Service? | ||
|---|---|---|
| The texts helped me to understand my situation and what I was going through. | 94.94% | 75 |
| It helped me to seek the right type of help at the right time. | 82.28% | 65 |
| I was able to handle many issues myself. | 68.35% | 54 |
| I felt the hospital continued to care for me even after I was discharged. | 89.87% | 71 |
| It helped me to clarify conflicting information on topics like diet/activity/breastfeeding. | 88.61% | 70 |
| It was information I could store and go back and read. | 68.35% | 54 |
| It reminded me about vaccination and review visits. | 78.21% | 61 |
| It addressed issues such as activity and contraception that I could then discuss with my provider. | 50.00% | 37 |