| Literature DB >> 35896722 |
Wenjie Yang1, Miao Ge2, Yabo Wang1, Xinrui Pang1, Congxia Wang3.
Abstract
The main targets of this were to screen the factors that may influence the distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D[25(OH)D] reference value in healthy elderly people in China, and further explored the geographical distribution differences of 25(OH)D reference value in China. In this study, we collected the 25(OH)D of 25,470 healthy elderly from 58 cities in China to analyze the correlation between 25(OH)D and 22 geography secondary indexes through spearman regression analysis. Six indexes with significant correlation were extracted, and a ridge regression model was built, and the country's urban healthy elderly'25(OH)D reference value was predicted. By using the disjunctive Kriging method, we obtained the geographical distribution of 25(OH)D reference values for healthy elderly people in China. The reference value of 25(OH)D for healthy elderly in China was significantly correlated with the 6 secondary indexes, namely, latitude (°), annual temperature range (°C), annual sunshine hours (h), annual mean temperature (°C), annual mean relative humidity (%), and annual precipitation (mm). The geographical distribution of 25(OH)D values of healthy elderly in China showed a trend of being higher in South China and lower in North China, and higher in coastal areas and lower in inland areas. This study lays a foundation for further research on the mechanism of different influencing factors on the reference value of 25(OH)D index. A ridge regression model composed of significant influencing factors has been established to provide the basis for formulating reference criteria for the treatment factors of the vitamin D deficiency and prognostic factors of the COVID-19 using 25(OH)D reference value in different regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35896722 PMCID: PMC9326152 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17198-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
The geographic indicators.
| Type | The name and unit of the indicator | Type | The name and unit of the indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Longitude (°) | Soil | Reference bulk density of topsoil (kg/dm3) |
| Latitude (°) | Gravel content of topsoil (% vol) | ||
| Terrain indicators | Altitude (m) | Organic matter content of topsoil (% wt) | |
| Climate | Annual sunshine duration (h) | pH value of topsoil | |
| Annual mean temperature (°C) | Cation exchange capacity of topsoil (cmol/kg) | ||
| Annual mean relative humidity (%) | Base saturation of topsoil (%) | ||
| Annual recipitation (mm) | Total exchangeable capacity of topsoil (cmol/kg) | ||
| Annual temperature range (°C) | Calcium carbonate content of topsoil (%) | ||
| Soil | Percentage of sand in topsoil (% wt) | Calcium sulfate content of topsoil (%) | |
| Topsoil silt percentage (% wt) | The alkalinity of topsoil (cmol/kg) | ||
| Percentage of clay in topsoil (% wt) | The salinity of topsoil (dS/m) |
Results of correlation analysis.
| Symbol | Geographic factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | Latitude (°) | − 0. 27** | 0. 005 |
| X2 | Annual sunshine duration (h) | 0. 36** | 0. 000 |
| X3 | Annual mean temperature (°C) | 0. 21* | 0. 029 |
| X4 | Annual mean relative humidity (%) | 0. 26** | 0. 008 |
| X5 | Annual precipitation (mm) | 0. 24* | 0. 01 |
| X6 | Annual temperature range (°C) | − 0. 20* | 0. 04 |
*Represents correlation, **represents the significant correlation.
Figure 1Ridge trace map of serum 25(OH)D reference value.
Figure 2Linear model of serum 25(OH)D reference value in healthy elderly.
Figure 3Ploynomial model of serum 25(OH)D reference value in healthy elderly.
Figure 4RBF model of serum 25(OH)D reference value in healthy elderly.
Figure 5Sigmoid model of serum 25(OH)D reference value in healthy elderly.
Prediction model error to each kernel function of serum 25(OH)D reference value.
| Symbol | Model name | RMSE (E) | Standard deviation (SD) | Correlation coefficient (CC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Sigmoid | 10. 8 | 6. 10 | 0. 02 |
| B | Ridge regression | 9. 06 | 3. 74 | 0. 30 |
| C | Linear | 8. 99 | 2. 25 | 0. 13 |
| D | RBF | 8. 98 | 2. 15 | 0. 11 |
| E | Polynomial | 8. 37 | 3. 48 | 0. 22 |
Figure 6Taylor Diagram representation of the accuracy of different models.
Figure 7Spatial distribution trend of serum 25(OH)D value in Chinese healthy elderly.
Figure 8Spatial distribution of serum 25(OH)D reference value in Chinese healthy elderly.