| Literature DB >> 35896689 |
Magdalena Ehn1, Sebastian Michel2, Laura Morales2, Tyler Gordon3, Hermann Gregor Dallinger2, Hermann Buerstmayr2.
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE: Association mapping and phenotypic analysis of a diversity panel of 238 bread wheat accessions highlights differences in resistance against common vs. dwarf bunt and identifies genotypes valuable for bi-parental crosses. Common bunt caused by Tilletia caries and T. laevis was successfully controlled by seed dressings with systemic fungicides for decades, but has become a renewed threat to wheat yield and quality in organic agriculture where such treatments are forbidden. As the most efficient way to address this problem is the use of resistant cultivars, this study aims to broaden the spectrum of resistance sources available for breeders by identifying resistance loci against common bunt in bread wheat accessions of the USDA National Small Grains Collection. We conducted three years of artificially inoculated field trials to assess common bunt infection levels in a diversity panel comprising 238 wheat accessions for which data on resistance against the closely related pathogen Tilletia controversa causing dwarf bunt was already available. Resistance levels against common bunt were higher compared to dwarf bunt with 99 accessions showing [Formula: see text] 1% incidence. Genome-wide association mapping identified six markers significantly associated with common bunt incidence in regions already known to confer resistance on chromosomes 1A and 1B and novel loci on 2B and 7A. Our results show that resistance against common and dwarf bunt is not necessarily controlled by the same loci but we identified twenty accessions with high resistance against both diseases. These represent valuable new resources for research and breeding programs since several bunt races have already been reported to overcome known resistance genes.Entities:
Keywords: Diversity panel; Genome-wide association mapping; Resistance breeding; Tilletia caries; Triticum aestivum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35896689 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04171-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theor Appl Genet ISSN: 0040-5752 Impact factor: 5.574