Juan Correa1, Ana Garcia-Barandela1, Llorenç Socias-Pinto1, Eduardo Fernandez-Megia1. 1. Centro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS), Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Jenaro de la Fuente s/n, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Abstract
The paramagnetic spin relaxation (PSR) filter allows the selective NMR signal suppression of components in mixtures according to their complexation ability to a paramagnetic ion. It relies on the faster relaxation of nuclei in paramagnetic environments and thus is complementary to classical diffusion and relaxation filters. So far, the PSR filter has established Gd3+ as the sole PSR agent, restricting the paramagnetic filtering repertoire. Herein, we present Cu2+ as a robust PSR agent with characteristic filtering properties. While Gd3+ depends on unspecific ion-pair interactions with anionic components, Cu2+ stands out for filtering species via ordered coordination complexes. An evaluation of the paramagnetic effect of Cu2+ over more than 50 small molecules and polymers has unveiled different sensitivities to Cu2+ (especially high for pyridines, diamines, polyamines, and amino alcohols) and precise filtering conditions for mixtures (1H, COSY, and HMQC) that were challenged with a test bed of commercial drugs. The advantage of integrating Cu2+ and Gd3+ for the stepwise PSR filtering of complex mixtures is also shown.
The paramagnetic spin relaxation (PSR) filter allows the selective NMR signal suppression of components in mixtures according to their complexation ability to a paramagnetic ion. It relies on the faster relaxation of nuclei in paramagnetic environments and thus is complementary to classical diffusion and relaxation filters. So far, the PSR filter has established Gd3+ as the sole PSR agent, restricting the paramagnetic filtering repertoire. Herein, we present Cu2+ as a robust PSR agent with characteristic filtering properties. While Gd3+ depends on unspecific ion-pair interactions with anionic components, Cu2+ stands out for filtering species via ordered coordination complexes. An evaluation of the paramagnetic effect of Cu2+ over more than 50 small molecules and polymers has unveiled different sensitivities to Cu2+ (especially high for pyridines, diamines, polyamines, and amino alcohols) and precise filtering conditions for mixtures (1H, COSY, and HMQC) that were challenged with a test bed of commercial drugs. The advantage of integrating Cu2+ and Gd3+ for the stepwise PSR filtering of complex mixtures is also shown.
As nature seldom provides pure
compounds, chemists have devoted great efforts to the separation of
complex mixtures. Fortunately, the NMR analysis of mixtures sidesteps
the necessity of physical separations under certain conditions. NMR
filters take advantage of differences in the diffusion coefficients
and relaxation times of the components for the selective signal suppression
of small molecules and macromolecules, respectively.[1,2] With the aim of widening the NMR filtering portfolio beyond molecular
weight limits, our group has described the paramagnetic spin relaxation
(PSR) filter,[3,4] which relies on the faster relaxation
of nuclei in paramagnetic environments.[5,6] The addition
of minute concentrations of Gd3+ (paramagnetic) to mixtures
allows the selective suppression of particular components from the
1D and 2D spectra, according to their Gd3+ complexation
ability (Figure ).
Since Gd3+ has the largest spin moment (S = 7/2) and a high electronic correlation time (τs ca. 10–8 s), the Solomon–Bloembergen–Morgan
equations predict a selective decrease of transverse relaxation times
(T2) for species in fast chemical exchange
with Gd3+.[7−9] The inverse proportionality between T2 and the spectral line width[10] leads to their selective signal suppression, without affecting the
resolution and chemical shift of other components in the mixture.
Since complexation to Gd3+ is mainly electrostatic (ion-pair),
the PSR filter affects more anionic species than neutral and cationic
species. Successful applications of the PSR filter include the sequential
NMR filtering of mixtures of interest in the pharmaceutical and food
industries[4,11] and the fast screening of DNA ligands.[12] Interestingly, the PSR filter benefits from
a rather low sensitivity to size and molecular weight that makes it
compatible with classical relaxation and diffusion filters. The advantage
of this is taken for the filtering of lower PSR-sensitive species,
which leads to line-broadening rather than a full signal embedment
in the baseline, by implementing a complementary short T2-filter, such as the Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill
(CPMG).[13,14]
Figure 1
PSR filters based on Gd3+ (ion-pair)
and Cu2+ (coordination) complexes.
PSR filters based on Gd3+ (ion-pair)
and Cu2+ (coordination) complexes.While the PSR filter based on ion-pair Gd3+-complexes
is highly efficient in simplifying the NMR analysis of complex mixtures,
the development of PSR filters with other paramagnetic ions displaying
alternative complexation modes would greatly extend the utility of
this technology. Herein, we describe our efforts toward a PSR filter
based on the more coordinating Cu2+ (S = 1/2, τs ca. 10–9 s), a paramagnetic
ion aimed at selectively filtering the NMR signals of species via
coordination complexes (Figure ).The feasibility of a Cu2+ PSR filter was
confirmed by
the selective suppression of glucosamine in the presence of glucose
(Figure C), a suppression
unfeasible to reproduce in the presence of Gd3+ (Figure S4) because of the similar sensitivity
of both components to this ion.[4] Conversely,
the coordinating 1,2-amino alcohol moiety of glucosamine ensures a
selective filtering in the presence of Cu2+.
Figure 2
(A) Successful
and failed PSR suppressions in two-component mixtures
(D2O, 500 MHz). (B) PSR filtering conditions for selective 1H, COSY, and HMQC suppressions. Representative examples of
selective suppressions between Blue-Yellow-Red categories. 1H NMR spectra (D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of a mixture of the
following: (C) glucosamine (2 mg/mL) and glucose (2 mg/mL) before
(a) and after (b) the addition of Cu2+ (2 mM), (D) 2-amino-1-phenyl-1,3-propanediol
(1 mg/mL) and adenosine (3 mg/mL) before (c) and after (d) the addition
of Cu2+ (0.16 mM) + T2-filter
(CPMG, 30 ms), and (E) adenosine (1.2 mg/mL) and glucose (1.6 mg/mL)
before (e) and after (f) the addition of Cu2+ (13 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 100 ms).
(A) Successful
and failed PSR suppressions in two-component mixtures
(D2O, 500 MHz). (B) PSR filtering conditions for selective 1H, COSY, and HMQC suppressions. Representative examples of
selective suppressions between Blue-Yellow-Red categories. 1H NMR spectra (D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of a mixture of the
following: (C) glucosamine (2 mg/mL) and glucose (2 mg/mL) before
(a) and after (b) the addition of Cu2+ (2 mM), (D) 2-amino-1-phenyl-1,3-propanediol
(1 mg/mL) and adenosine (3 mg/mL) before (c) and after (d) the addition
of Cu2+ (0.16 mM) + T2-filter
(CPMG, 30 ms), and (E) adenosine (1.2 mg/mL) and glucose (1.6 mg/mL)
before (e) and after (f) the addition of Cu2+ (13 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 100 ms).The scope of Cu2+ as coordinating PSR
agent was assessed
by analyzing the paramagnetic effect on the 1H NMR spectra
of a collection of more than 50 small molecules and polymers of interest
in the pharmaceutical and food industries, which display a large variety
of functional groups. Depending on the extent of signal broadening
(from no effect to complete suppression), these species were assigned
to seven groups (Table ), with the more sensitive ones comprising highly coordinating compounds. 1H NMR spectra of representative molecules in the upper, medium,
and bottom parts of Table , recorded in the absence/presence of Cu2+, are
shown in Figures S1–S3: (1S,2S)-2-amino-1-phenyl-1,3-propanediol,
adenosine, sucrose. As a rule of thumb, the broadening effect of Cu2+ on the 1H NMR spectra of pyridines, diamines,
polyamines, and amino alcohols was considerably higher than with Gd3+,[4] in consistency with a higher
coordination ability.
Table 1
Paramagnetic Broadening Effect (Groups
1–7) and Ease of Suppression by Cu2+ (Blue, Yellow,
Red Categories) in 1H NMR (4 mg/mL in D2O, 500
MHz, 300 K)a
Group 7: suppression of all signals
at <1 mM Cu2+, Group 6: suppression of all signals at
>1 mM Cu2+, Group 5: broadening of all signals at >1
mM
Cu2+, Group 4: suppression of some signals at >1 mM
Cu2+, Group 3: broadening of some signals at >1 mM Cu2+, Group 2: reduced signal resolution at >1 mM Cu2+, Group
1: no effect on signal resolution at >1 mM Cu2+.
Group 7: suppression of all signals
at <1 mM Cu2+, Group 6: suppression of all signals at
>1 mM Cu2+, Group 5: broadening of all signals at >1
mM
Cu2+, Group 4: suppression of some signals at >1 mM
Cu2+, Group 3: broadening of some signals at >1 mM Cu2+, Group 2: reduced signal resolution at >1 mM Cu2+, Group
1: no effect on signal resolution at >1 mM Cu2+.Next, the possibility of performing selective suppressions
by Cu2+ among the seven groups in Table was assessed in two-component mixtures (Figure A). It was confirmed
that the more distant the groups, the easier the selective suppressions.
Also, the impossibility of performing suppressions within a single
group and between some neighboring groups. As a result, the initial
groups (reflecting the paramagnetic broadening effect) were reduced
to just three categories (designated as Blue, Yellow, and Red), according
to their ease of suppression by Cu2+. In addition, from
data in Figure A,
general conditions for selective 1H, COSY, and HMQC suppressions
between categories were determined (concentration of Cu2+/length of a complementary CMPG T2-filter; Figure B):Blue-Red: > 2.0 mM Cu2+Blue-Yellow: < 2.0 mM Cu2+, < 50 ms CPMGYellow-Red: > 2.0
mM Cu2+, > 50 ms CPMGFigure depicts
representative examples of successful suppressions within these three
categories. For instance, the aforementioned glucosamine/glucose suppression
can be easily rationalized now, considering their respective inclusion
into the Blue and Red categories (Figure C). Similarly, Figure D,E show selective suppressions that exploit
the use of complementary T2-filters between
components of contiguous categories. Remarkably, none of these suppressions
could be realized with Gd3+ as PSR ion (Figures S4–S6), confirming the coordination ability
of Cu2+ as responsible of the selectivity achieved. Other
representative spectra of successful (different categories) and unfruitful
(same category) suppressions in the two-component mixtures shown in Figure A are included in
the SI (Figures S7–S12). Additional
advantages that emerged on the use of Cu2+ vs Gd3+ as PSR agent include the possibility of working in a wider pH-range
(Gd3+ tends to precipitate at pH > 7.0) and a smaller
broadening
effect over the residual HOD signal.The reliability of Table to predict Cu2+ PSR filters in complex mixtures
was challenged with a test bed of commercial drugs, namely (i) an
amoxicillin/clavulanic acid antibiotic (amoxicillin, clavulanic acid,
PEG, PVP); (ii) Cariban, a drug to treat nausea and vomiting in pregnancy
(doxylamine, pyridoxine, sucrose); (iii) the antibiotic Proderma (doxycycline,
sucrose); and (iv) Atepodin, a medicine for the treatment and diagnosis
of supraventricular tachycardia (adenosine triphosphate, glycine,
benzyl alcohol).We started analyzing Amoxicillin/Clavulanic
acid Cinfamed, an antibiotic
that contains two active ingredients, the penicillin-like antibiotic
amoxicillin (Blue) and the beta-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid
(not included in Table but expected to be Blue by similarity). NMR-visible excipients comprise
poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), both Red
species. Attending to the Blue and Red categories of the constituents,
a selective PSR suppression was anticipated for amoxicillin and clavulanic
acid in the presence of Cu2+. Figure shows their selective filtering, confirming
the predictive character of Table , and the three color categories proposed. When lower
concentrations of Cu2+ were assessed, it was even possible
to attain a stepwise suppression of the Blue components, filtering
first the more coordinating amoxicillin. Interestingly, the use of
Gd3+ did not afford a clean suppression of any component,
confirming Cu2+ as a PSR agent with characteristic filtering
properties.
Figure 3
1H NMR spectra (D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of Amoxicillin/Clavulanic
acid Cinfamed (10 mg/mL) before (a) and after the addition of 4 and
17 mM Cu2+ (b and c, respectively).
1H NMR spectra (D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of Amoxicillin/Clavulanic
acid Cinfamed (10 mg/mL) before (a) and after the addition of 4 and
17 mM Cu2+ (b and c, respectively).Then, we proceeded to analyze three commercial
drugs (Cariban,
Proderma, Atepodin) containing Yellow and Red components, where a
complementary CPMG filter was expected for successful suppressions.
Cariban is a medicine used to treat nausea and vomiting in pregnant
women that contains doxylamine (antihistamine) and pyridoxine (vitamin
B6) as active ingredients, both substituted pyridines that
belong to the Yellow category. The mixture also includes sucrose (Red)
as NMR-visible excipient. As predicted, the only addition of Cu2+ did not result in a clean filtering of doxylamine and pyridoxine.
However, concomitant application of a short CPMG filter afforded their
clean suppression, leaving unaffected the resolution and chemical
shift of the sucrose signals (Figure ). Remarkably, the fidelity of the PSR-CPMG filter
was also demonstrated in 2D COSY and HMQC experiments, where the CPMG
sequence was used as an excitation block replacing the first excitation
pulse.[15] Not unexpectedly, the use of Gd3+ as PSR agent was again unsuccessful, either in the absence
or presence of CPMG filters.
Figure 4
1H, 1H–1H COSY, and 1H–13C HMQC spectra (D2O, 500
MHz, 300 K) of Cariban (72 mg/mL) before (a, c, e) and after (b, d,
f) the addition of Cu2+ (13 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 75 ms).
1H, 1H–1H COSY, and 1H–13C HMQC spectra (D2O, 500
MHz, 300 K) of Cariban (72 mg/mL) before (a, c, e) and after (b, d,
f) the addition of Cu2+ (13 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 75 ms).The antibiotic Proderma contains two NMR-visible
components, the
active ingredient doxycycline (Yellow) and sucrose (Red) as excipient.
Here again, the direct filtering of the most sensitive Yellow component
was unfeasible by the sole addition of Cu2+. However, implementation
of a simultaneous short CPMG filter allowed the clean suppression
of doxycycline (Figure ). Very similar filtering conditions also allowed the efficient filtering
of the Yellow components (adenosine triphosphate and glycine) of Atepodin
(Figure S13).
Figure 5
1H NMR spectra
(D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of Proderma
(4 mg/mL) before (a) and after (b) the addition of Cu2+ (4 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 75 ms).
1H NMR spectra
(D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of Proderma
(4 mg/mL) before (a) and after (b) the addition of Cu2+ (4 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 75 ms).Having established the utility of Cu2+ as PSR agent
with filtering properties dependent on the coordination ability of
the components in a mixture (rather than ion-pair interactions for
Gd3+), we decided to assess the integration of both paramagnetic
ions in the filtering of complex mixtures. To this end, we selected
Acetilcisteina Mylan, a commercial mucolytic drug composed of acetylcysteine
(CuYellow/GdYellow) as active ingredient, citric
acid (CuBlue/GdBlue) as excipient, and two sweeteners,
D-mannitol (CuRed/GdYellow) and sodium saccharin
(CuRed/GdRed). Attending to the Blue-Yellow-Red
category of the components toward Gd3+, we have previously
reported the sequential suppression of citric acid in a first step,
followed by the simultaneous suppression of acetylcysteine and D-mannitol
(both GdYellow components).[4] Herein, the stronger Cu2+-coordination of acetylcysteine
than D-mannitol (Table ) has been exploited for the stepwise suppression of the three components
in a way unattainable with a single PSR agent. Thus, as shown in Figure , after an initial
suppression of citric acid with Gd3+, acetylcysteine was
filtered with Cu2+, followed by a final suppression of
D-mannitol with Gd3+.
Figure 6
NMR-visible components of Acetilcisteina
Mylan and their respective
Blue-Yellow-Red categories toward Cu2+ and Gd3+. 1H NMR spectra (D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of Acetilcisteina
Mylan (25 mg/mL) supplemented with saccharin (12.5 mg/mL) before (a)
and after the addition of (b) Gd3+ (25 μM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 25 ms), (c) Cu2+ (2.5
mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 250 ms), and (d)
Gd3+ (0.2 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG,
300 ms).
NMR-visible components of Acetilcisteina
Mylan and their respective
Blue-Yellow-Red categories toward Cu2+ and Gd3+. 1H NMR spectra (D2O, 500 MHz, 300 K) of Acetilcisteina
Mylan (25 mg/mL) supplemented with saccharin (12.5 mg/mL) before (a)
and after the addition of (b) Gd3+ (25 μM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 25 ms), (c) Cu2+ (2.5
mM) + T2-filter (CPMG, 250 ms), and (d)
Gd3+ (0.2 mM) + T2-filter (CPMG,
300 ms).Application of the PSR filter with Cu2+ starts with
the assignment of the individual components in a mixture to the Blue-Yellow-Red
categories. As a first approach, users are advised to find structural
similarities between the species in a mixture of interest and those
in Table . Nevertheless,
for a proper inclusion of species in the Blue-Yellow-Red categories,
the paramagnetic effect of Cu2+ on their 1H
NMR spectra should be determined as described in Table (extent of signal broadening
as a function of the concentration of Cu2+). Once the species
have been assigned to the three categories, selective suppressions
could be expected by application of the PSR conditions shown in Figure B. While clean suppressions
operate for Blue species in the presence of Red ones by the simple
addition of mM concentrations of Cu2+, the selective filtering
of species from contiguous categories (Blue-Yellow and Yellow-Red)
are unfeasible by the sole addition of Cu2+, being necessary
the implementation of simultaneous CPMG filters. Although the selective
filtering of species within a category might work in specific examples
using increasing concentrations of Cu2+ or tuning the length
of CPMG filters, this will not be of general application because the 1H T2 values of the species in
a category will level down in the presence of a PSR agent, making
unlikely their selective suppression.In conclusion, Cu2+ is presented as a robust PSR agent
with characteristic NMR filtering properties different than Gd3+, the archetypal PSR agent so far. Not only do the paramagnetic
properties change between nuclei, but also their complexation modes
differ, offering the opportunity to tune the outcome of the PSR filter.
While Gd3+ relies on the ion-pair complexation ability
of the components in a mixture (mainly anionic species), Cu2+ stands out because of a greater capacity of filtering species that
participate in coordination complexes, such as pyridines, diamines,
polyamines, and amino alcohols. An evaluation of the paramagnetic
effect of Cu2+ over more than 50 small molecules and polymers
has unveiled three categories of compounds (Blue-Yellow-Red categories
according to their ease of suppression by Cu2+) and precise
filtering conditions for 1H, COSY, and HMQC between them.
The integration of the specific filtering properties of Cu2+ and Gd3+ as PSR agents to the analysis of complex mixtures
has been also demonstrated, widening the horizons of the PSR technology
to quality control, natural product extracts, or the metabolic profiling
of biological samples. Finally, having demonstrated the utility of
Cu2+ as PSR agent, a more precise assignment of species
to the Blue-Yellow-Red categories is envisaged using the transverse
relaxation enhancement (R2p), as previously
done for Gd3+.[4] This approach,
which involves the analysis of the1H T2 values of the species of interest in the absence and
presence of Cu2+, will be the focus of our investigations
in the future and reported in due time.