| Literature DB >> 35895628 |
Aqsa Javaid1, Farhan Younas1, Ikram Ullah1, Masoom Yasinzai1.
Abstract
A 42-days experiment was conducted on a day old birds (n = 400) to evaluate the effect of enzyme supplements in feed on the growth, blood parameters, phosphorous content in bones, and nitrogen retention. Different treatments included: control (C) without enzyme supplement, while the other three groups included enzyme mixture T1 and T2 with two commercially available enzyme mix, and T3 with indigenously produced multi-enzyme complex from Bacillus subtilis KT004404. Birds that were fed with indigenously produced multi-enzyme complex showed significant weight gain as compared to other groups. The total feed intake of the birds fed with enzyme supplements was higher than the birds in the control group. The feed conversion ratio was significantly improved (p < 0.05) in treatment groups (T1, T2, T3) as compared to the control. The blood parameters which were analyzed included uric acid, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and serum proteins i.e. globulin and albumin. Birds fed with the enzyme in the group T1, T2 and T3 exhibited higher (p < 0.05) body weight gain. Tibia ash content was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in T1, T2, and T3 as compared to the control. The results of the current study indicate that supplementing poultry feed with the exogenous multi-enzyme produced from Bacillus subtilis KT004404 improved the growth of the birds, feed utilization, and exhibited beneficial effects on the blood parameters, phosphorous and nitrogen retention in broiler chicken.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35895628 PMCID: PMC9328567 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Nutrient composition of diet fed to broilers and proximate analysis of feed ingredients.
| Feed Ingredient (g/kg) | Starter | Finisher |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 300.02 | 550.55 |
| Soybean meal (46% CP) | 325.23 | 179.6 |
| Rice grits | 200.49 | 120.67 |
| Sunflower meal | 50 | 42.78 |
| Fish meal | 25 | 40 |
| Limestone | 12 | 12 |
| Canola | 73.56 | 43.2 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 10 | 7.5 |
| Vitamin premix 1 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| Molasses | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Composition Analysis | ||
| Metabolic energy | 2985 kcal /kg | 3122 kcal/ kg |
| Linoleic acid % | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| Methionine % | 0.48 | 0.44 |
| Lysine % | 1.24 | 1.09 |
| Tryptophan % | 0.29 | 0.20 |
| Crude Fiber % | 4.95 | 6.14 |
| Crude Protein % | 23.76 | 21.88 |
| Crude Fat % | 5.86 | 4.57 |
| Ash content % | 7.52 | 7.98 |
| Moisture % | 9.6 | 10.9 |
aVitamin premix per kg: retinyl acetate (12,000 UI), cholecalciferol (2500 UI), menadione (2 mg), riboflavin (5 mg), niacin (0.04g), cobalamin (1.5 mcg), folic acid (0.5 mg), biotin (0.05 mg), selenium (0.2 mg).
Fig 1Effects of enzymes’ treatment on body weight gain and growth in birds.
Values represent mean ± (SD). Significant differences by Tukey’s test: *p<0.01 from Control group; +p<0.01 from the treatment group (T1 and T2).
Fig 2Effects of enzymes’ treatment on feed intake in birds.
Values represent mean ± (SD). Significant differences by Tukey’s test: *p<0.01 from control group; ++p<0.01 and +p<0.05 from treatment T1 group and #p<0.01 from T2 group.
Fig 3Effects of enzymes’ treatment on FCR in birds.
Values represent mean ± (SD). Significant differences by Tukey’s test: *p<0.01 from control; +p<0.05 from T1 group.
Fig 4Effects of enzymes’ treatment on serum uric acid.
Values represent mean ± (SD). Significant differences by Tukey’s test: *p<0.05 from the control group.
Fig 5Effects of enzymes treatment on triglycerides and total cholesterol levels.
Values represent mean ± (SD).
Fig 6Effects of enzymes treatment on total protein, globulin and albumin levels in blood.
Values represent mean ± (SD), *p<0.01 from control group, *p<0.01 from control group, ++p<0.01 and +p<0.05 from T1 group.
Enzyme activities in the pancreases and intestine in the birds.
| Enzymatic activities U/mL | C | T1 (Phytezyme) | T2 (Biomax) | T3 (IE) | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatic enzymes | ||||||
| Protease | 27.72±4.7 | 29.6±1.9 | 36.1±6.4 | 41.6b | 2.0 |
|
| α-amylase | 1123.9±74.1 | 1158±66.4 | 1058.4±37.7 | 1115.69±35.0 | 17.5 | 0.28 |
| Trypsin | 87.2± 5.8 | 65.9 | 70.9 | 70.6 | 2.5 |
|
| Lipase | 65.9±5.6 | 59.1±3.1 | 63.6±5.7 | 69.8±5.9 | 1.7 | 0.21 |
| Intestinal Homogenate | ||||||
| Protease | 7.01±0.7 | 11.61 | 13.51 | 15.77 | 1.0 |
|
| α-amylase | 714.92±64.7 | 988.39 | 970.66 | 1011.1 | 38.22 |
|
| Trypsin | 19.60±2.8 | 37.66 | 41.99 | 45.62 | 3.0 |
|
| Lipase | 46.23±4.5 | 47.31±3.1 | 48.05±2.3 | 37.82 | 1.5 |
|
Values represent mean and standard deviation
Abbreviations: IE, indigenously produced enzyme; SEM, standard error of the mean.
* p value ≤ 0.05
** p value ≤ 0.01
a Superscript shows significant differences as compared to control (C) of respective enzyme activity (across the row).
ab Superscript shows the significant difference with both C and T1 of respective enzyme activity (across the row).
abc Superscript indicated significant difference as compared to C, T1 and T2 of respective enzyme activity (across the row).
Nitrogen and phosphorous content of broiler excreta.
| Parameters | Control | T1 (Phytezyme) | T2 (Biomax) | T3 (IE) | SEM | p- value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMI (g) | 683.81±21.88 | 609.0933 | 611.40 | 621.02 | 11.4 |
|
| DME (g) | 185.27±10.5 | 153.233 | 163.44 | 150.05 | 4.4 |
|
| NI (g) | 18.9±0.7 | 18.7±1.4 | 17.9±1.2 | 16.5±1.3 | 0.41 | 0.15 |
| NE (g) | 10.8±0.4 | 9.5±0.4 | 9.2 | 9.3±0.9 | 0.2 |
|
| PI (g) | 4.5±0.6 | 3.8±0.1 | 3.7±0.1 | 3.7±0.2 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| PE (g) | 3.17±0.03 | 2.4 | 2.5a | 2.8a | 0.09 |
|
Values represent mean and standard deviation
Abbreviations: DMI, dry matter intake; DME, Dry Matter excreted; NI, Nitrogen intake; NE, nitrogen in excreta; PI, Phosphorous intake; PE, Phosphorous excreted; IE, indigenously produced enzyme; SEM, standard error of the mean
* p value ≤ 0.05
** p value ≤ 0.01
a Superscript shows significant differences as compared to control (C) across the row.
ab Superscript shows the significant difference with both C and T2 (across the row).
Determination of tibia ash content in the broiler chicken.
| Tibia dimension mm | Control | T1 (Phytezyme) | T2 (Biomax) | T3 (IE) | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 75.7± 0.4 | 75.6± 0.4 | 75.8± 0.9 | 75.7± 0.3 | 0.14 | 0.95 |
| Width | 6.2± 0.3 | 6.3± 0.3 | 6.2± 0.26 | 6.2± 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.87 |
| Tibia Ash | 37.3 | 43.5 | 42.9 | 42.8 | 0.76 |
|
| Phosphorous | 16.2 | 17.3b ± 0.3 | 17.1 | 17.3 | 0.16 |
|
Values represent mean and standard deviation
Abbreviations: IE, indigenously produced enzyme; SEM, standard error of the mean.
** p value ≤ 0.01
a b Mean values (C, T1, T2, T3) within a row which do not have common superscript are different (p <0.05).
1 Expressed as the percentage of bone ash relative to the weight of bone
2 Expressed as a percentage of tibia ash content