| Literature DB >> 35895361 |
Manikandan Srinivasan1, Kulandaipalayam Natarajan Sindhu1, J Senthil Kumar1, Ranjith Kumar Ramasamy1, Agila Kumari Pragasam2, Pratheepa Aasaithampi1, Venkata Raghava Mohan3, Gagandeep Kang1, Jacob John3.
Abstract
We report an outbreak of typhoid fever between April and June 2019 in the Surveillance for Enteric Fever in India cohort, a pediatric cohort from four contiguous semi-urban settlements of Vellore in South India. This cohort of children 6 months to 15 years of age was under surveillance from October 2017 to December 2019. A clustering of typhoid cases in the cohort was noted with reference to time, place, and person. The overall typhoid attack rate in the cohort was 0.9%, with the highest attack rate of 1.7% being documented in one of the four areas. The rate of hospitalization and complications in children who were typhoid positive during the outbreak was 28% and 2%, respectively. Given the background of suboptimal water, sanitation, and hygiene, and the risk of typhoid fever outbreaks in these settings, it is imperative that a typhoid vaccine be considered for introduction as a pragmatic preventive approach.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35895361 PMCID: PMC9294687 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 3.707
Figure 1.Epidemic curve showing the number of children with typhoid fever in the Surveillance for Enteric Fever in India cohort between January and September 2018 and 2019 overall (A) and area-wise in 2019 (B). (C) Spot map showing cases of typhoid fever in the four urban areas of Vellore during 2019 indicating the sporadic and outbreak cases using a geographic information system. This figure appears in color at www.ajtmh.org.
Baseline characteristics of the children with typhoid fever during the outbreak in the Surveillance for Enteric Fever in India cohort (N = 51)
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Age group, years | |
| < 5 | 9 (17.7) |
| 5–10 | 25 (49) |
| 10–15 | 17 (33.3) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 28 (54.9) |
| Female | 23 (45.1) |
| Area-wise attack rates (per 100 children) | |
| Chinnallapuram | 2 of 1,527 (0.1) |
| Ramnaickanpalayam | 10 of 1,516 (0.7) |
| Vasanthapuram | 8 of 838 (1.0) |
| Kaspa | 31 of 1,824 (1.7) |
| Clinical features | |
| Fever | 51 (100) |
| Headache | 28 (54.9) |
| Cough | 22 (43.1) |
| Vomiting | 21 (41.2) |
| Abdominal pain | 20 (39.2) |
| Diarrhea | 13 (25.5) |
| Constipation | 1 (2) |
| Blood in stool | 1 (2) |
| Jaundice | 1 (2) |
| Duration of fever, days; median (IQR) | 8 (7–10) |
| Highest temperature, °F; median (IQR) | 103 (102–103.6) |
| Children with blood culture–confirmed typhoid fever who were hospitalized | 14 (27.5) |
| Complication of subsultus tendinum | 1 (2) |
| Antibiotic susceptibility testing | |
| Ampicillin sensitive | 51 (100) |
| Chloramphenicol sensitive | 51 (100) |
| Cotrimoxazole sensitive | 51 (100) |
| Ceftriaxone sensitive | 51 (100) |
| Azithromycin sensitive | 51 (100) |
| Ciprofloxacin sensitive* | 1 (2) |
Of the 51 typhoid outbreak cases, 24 children received azithromycin for a median duration of 9 days; 11 received any two of the antibiotics- azithromycin, amoxycillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, and ofloxacin, for a median duration of 12 days; and 16 received any three of the antibiotics- azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, amoxycillin, cefotaxime, gentamycin, ampicillin, doxycycline, linezolid, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and cotrimoxazole, for a median duration of 15 days.
Of the 51 isolates, only one isolate was susceptible to ciprofloxacin, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.06 μg/mL; 47 were of intermediate susceptibility, with an MIC ranging between 0.12 and 0.5 μg/mL; and three were resistant to ciprofloxacin, with an MIC ≥ 1 μg/mL.
Risk factors studied at the household level for typhoid fever (N = 917)
| Risk factors | Households* ( | Households with typhoid fever ( | Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source of drinking water† | |||
| Unimproved | 758 (82.7) | 41 (93.2) | 3.0 (1.0–15.2) |
| Improved | 159 (17.3) | 3 (6.8) | Ref. |
| Sanitation facility‡ | |||
| Unimproved | 693 (75.6) | 37 (84.1) | 1.8 (0.8–4.1) |
| Improved | 224 (24.4) | 7 (15.9) | Ref. |
| Socio-economic status§ | |||
| Low | 619 (67.5) | 30 (68.2) | 1.0 (0.5–2) |
| Middle | 274 (29.9) | 14 (31.8) | Ref. |
| High | 24 (2.6) | 0 | – |
| Presence of preschool children in the household | |||
| Yes | 113 (12.3) | 10 (22.7) | 2.2 (0.9–4.7) |
| No | 804 (87.7) | 34 (77.3) | Ref. |
| Consumption of raw salads (onion/cucumber/tomato) ( | |||
| Ever | 493 (54.2) | 30 (69.8) | 2.0 (1.0–4.3) |
| Never | 416 (45.8) | 13 (30.2) | Ref. |
| Consumption of locally prepared popsicles | |||
| Ever | 328 (35.8) | 24 (54.6) | 2.2 (1.2–4.4) |
| Never | 589 (64.2) | 20 (45.5) | Ref. |
| Consumption of fruit juices ( | |||
| Ever | 335 (37.3) | 13 (52) | 1.9 (0.8–4.5) |
| Never | 563 (62.7) | 12 (48) | Ref. |
| Consumption of locally prepared flavored drinks ( | |||
| Ever | 523 (58.2) | 16 (64) | 1.3 (0.5–3.3) |
| Never | 375 (41.8) | 9 (36) | Ref. |
Ref. = reference value.
N = 917 households unless specified otherwise.
Municipal water supply was classified as unimproved drinking water because of it being at risk of contamination before the point of collection at the household level.
Households with toilets with its effluents being discharged into drains without treatment were classified as having unimproved sanitation. Those households with effluents from toilets contained in a septic tank were classified as having improved sanitation.
Socioeconomic status classification was done using modified Kuppuswamy scale that accounted for occupation, education, and selected assets.