| Literature DB >> 35894147 |
Yan Jia1, Jigao Sun2, Zhaoxu Jia1,3, Zhipeng Xue1, Rongtian Wang1, Haijun He4, Weiheng Chen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although tongue manifestation is a vital component of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), relevant research on patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is still lacking. This study will explore the characteristic tongue manifestation of ONFH patients to inform future research and clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-sectional study; Osteonecrosis of the femoral head; Tongue manifestation; Traditional chinese medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35894147 PMCID: PMC9483080 DOI: 10.1111/os.13388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Surg ISSN: 1757-7853 Impact factor: 2.279
Classification of tongue diagnosis
| Tongue manifestation | Design and classification |
|---|---|
| Tongue body shape | Normal, Enlarged, Thin |
| Tongue body color | Pale, Pale red, Red, Crimson, Purple, Petechia |
| Tongue coating thickness | Thin, Thick |
| Tongue coating color | White, Yellow |
| Tongue coating moisture | Moist, Dry |
Characteristics of 375 ONFH patients
| Variables | Number | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 276 | 73.6 |
| Female | 99 | 26.4 |
| Age group | ||
| 18–39 | 119 | 31.7 |
| 40–59 | 201 | 53.6 |
| ≥60 | 55 | 14.7 |
| ARCO stage | ||
| I | 2 | 0.5 |
| II | 109 | 29.1 |
| III | 175 | 46.7 |
| IV | 89 | 23.7 |
| Etiology | ||
| Idiopathic | 177 | 47.2 |
| Alcoholic | 138 | 36.8 |
| Corticosteroid | 44 | 11.7 |
| Trauma | 16 | 4.3 |
| Harris score | ||
| ≥70 | 76 | 20.3 |
| <70 | 299 | 79.7 |
| VAS score | ||
| ≥6 | 169 | 45.1 |
| <6 | 206 | 54.9 |
Tongue manifestation of 375 ONFH patients
| Tongue manifestation | Number | Percent |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue body shape | |||
| Normal | 121 | 32.3 | |
| Enlarged | 50 | 13.3 | 0.000 |
| Thin | 204 | 54.4 | |
| Tongue body color | |||
| Pale | 120 | 32.0 | |
| Pale red | 67 | 17.9 | 0.000 |
| Red | 114 | 30.4 | |
| Crimson | 33 | 8.8 | |
| Purple | 38 | 10.1 | |
| Petechia | 3 | 0.8 | |
| Tongue coating thickness | |||
| Thin | 133 | 35.5 | 0.000 |
| Thick | 242 | 64.5 | |
| Tongue coating color | |||
| White | 216 | 57.6 | 0.003 |
| Yellow | 159 | 42.4 | |
| Tongue coating moisture | |||
| Moist | 299 | 79.7 | 0.000 |
| Dry | 76 | 20.3 |
Gender and age analysis of tongue manifestation (n, %)
| Tongue manifestation | Tongue body shape | Tongue body color | Tongue coating thickness | Tongue coating color | Tongue coating moisture | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Enlarged | Thin | Pale | Pale red | Red | Crimson | Purple | Petechia | Thin | Thick | White | Yellow | Moist | Dry | |
| Sex | |||||||||||||||
| Male | 92 (76.0) | 36 (72.0) | 148 (72.5) | 95 (79.2) | 49 (73.1) | 82 (71.9) | 23 (69.7) | 24 (63.2) | 3 (100.0) | 92 (69.2) | 184 (76.0) | 159 (73.6) | 117 (73.6) | 223 (74.6) | 53 (69.7) |
| Female | 29 (24.0) | 14 (28.0) | 204 (27.5) | 25 (20.8) | 18 (26.9) | 32 (28.1) | 10 (30.3) | 14 (36.8) | 0 | 41 (30.8) | 58 (24.0) | 57 (26.4) | 42 (26.4) | 76 (25.4) | 23 (30.3) |
| χ2 | 0.55 | 5.165 | 2.079 | 0 | 0.732 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.759 | 0.377 | 0.149 | 0.995 | 0.392 | ||||||||||
| Age group | |||||||||||||||
| 18–39 | 46 (38.0) | 9 (18.0) | 64 (31.4) | 42 (35.0) | 22 (32.8) | 32 (28.1) | 12 (36.4) | 11 (28.9) | 0 | 42 (31.6) | 77 (31.8) | 66 (30.6) | 53 (33.3) | 94 (31.4) | 25 (32.9) |
| 40–59 | 64 (52.9) | 28 (56.0) | 109 (53.4) | 63 (52.5) | 32 (47.8) | 65 (57.0) | 16 (48.5) | 22 (57.9) | 3 (100.0) | 72 (54.1) | 129 (53.3) | 119 (55.1) | 82 (51.6) | 160 (53.5) | 41 (53.9) |
| ≥60 | 11 (9.1) | 13 (26.0) | 31 (15.2) | 15 (12.5) | 13 (19.4) | 17 (14.9) | 5 (15.2) | 5 (13.2) | 0 | 19 (14.3) | 36 (14.9) | 31 (14.4) | 24 (15.1) | 45 (15.1) | 10 (13.2) |
| χ2 | 11.534 | 5.37 | 0.033 | 0.469 | 0.191 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.021 | 0.872 | 0.984 | 0.791 | 0.909 | ||||||||||
Comparison of tongue body and tongue color with different causes (n, %)
| Tongue manifestation | Trauma | Alcoholic | Corticosteroid | Idiopathic |
| χ2 value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue body shape | ||||||
| Normal | 3 (18.8) | 54 (39.1) | 19 (43.2) | 45 (25.4) | 0.000 | 64.078 |
| Enlarged | 10 (62.5) | 84 (60.9) | 24 (54.6) | 86 (48.6) | ||
| Thin | 3 (18.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.3) | 46 (26.0) | ||
| Tongue body color | ||||||
| Pale | 6 (37.5) | 53 (38.4) | 7 (15.9) | 54 (30.5) | ||
| Pale red | 2 (12.5) | 27 (19.6) | 6 (13.6) | 32 (18.1) | 0.120 | 20.266 |
| Red | 6 (37.5) | 33 (23.9) | 20 (45.5) | 55 (31.1) | ||
| Crimson | 0 (0.0) | 12 (8.7) | 6 (13.6) | 15 (8.5) | ||
| Purple | 2 (12.5) | 12 (8.7) | 5 (11.4) | 19 (10.7) | ||
| Petechia | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.1) |
Comparison of tongue coating with different causes (n, %)
| Tongue manifestation | Trauma | Alcoholic | Corticosteroid | Idiopathic |
| χ2 value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue coating thickness | ||||||
| Thick | 12 (75.0) | 91 (65.9) | 25 (56.8) | 114 (64.4) | 0.556 | 2.031 |
| Thin | 4 (25.0) | 47 (34.1) | 19 (43.2) | 63 (35.6) | ||
| Tongue coating color | ||||||
| White | 8 (50.0) | 79 (57.3) | 26 (59.1) | 103 (58.2) | 0.930 | 0.451 |
| Yellow | 8 (50.0) | 59 (42.8) | 18 (40.9) | 74 (41.8) | ||
| Tongue coating moisture | ||||||
| Moist | 15 (93.8) | 111 (80.4) | 33 (75.0) | 140 (79.1) | 0.478 | 2.490 |
| Dry | 1 (6.3) | 27 (19.6) | 11 (25.0) | 37 (20.9) |
Fig. 1Three categories of tongue manifestation clustering analysis when the rescaled distance was set as 20. Category 1 (9 items): normal or thin tongue shape; pale, pale red, red, crimson or purple tongue color; thin and dry tongue coating. Category 2 (2 items): enlarged tongue shape; white tongue coating. Category 3 (3 items): thick, moist and yellow tongue coating
Correspondence between tongue manifestation clustering analysis and TCM Syndrome of ONFH
| Tongue manifestation clustering analysis | TCM syndrome type | Pathogenesis and pathological implications |
|---|---|---|
|
Category 1 (1) Normal or thin, crimson or purple tongue, thin and dry tongue coating |
Type I: Type II: meridian obstruction |
Hip trauma injuries local blood network, resulting in the blocking of blood circulation in the femoral head. Or |
| (2) pale, pale red or red tongue | Type III: deficiency of the liver and kidney | Insufficient |
|
Category 2 Enlarged tongue body, white coating |
Type IV: phlegm‐stasis blocking collateral | The substances produced by alcohol, corticosteroid or other issues affect the blood vessels in the femoral head. |
|
Category 3 Thick moist yellow tongue coating |
The produced substances block the local blood vessels for a long time, leading to the changes in the metabolism of body fluids. |
Fig. 2(A) Normal tongue is shown as pale red tongue and thin white coating. Red point stands for tongue coating; yellow point stands for tongue body; black dotted line represents the tongue body shape relative to mouth. (B) TCM type I: red tongue, thin coating with petechia. A 48‐year‐old male patient with idiopathic ONFH, ARCO stage III, Harris score 69. (C) TCM type II: purple tongue, thick white coating. A 37‐year‐old male patient with alcoholic ONFH, ARCO stage III, Harris score 69. (D) TCM type III: pale tongue. A 38‐year‐old female with corticosteroid ONFH, ARCO stage II, Harris score 58. (E) TCM type IV: enlarged tongue bearing dental indentations on the margin, moist white coating. A 54‐year‐old female patient with idiopathic ONFH, ARCO stage IV, Harris score 65.