| Literature DB >> 35893963 |
Mariana Roldi-Oliveira1, Layse M Diniz1, Anastasia L Elias2, Sandra M Luz1.
Abstract
With growing environmental concerns over synthetic polymers, natural polymeric materials, such as hemicellulose, are considered a good sustainable alternative. Curaua fibers could be an excellent source of biopolymer as they have a relatively high hemicellulose content (15 wt%) and only a small amount of lignin (7 wt%). In this work, hemicellulose was extracted by an alkaline medium using KOH and the influence of the alkali concentration, temperature, and time was studied. A hemicellulose film was produced by water casting and its mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties were characterized. The results show that the best method, which resulted in the highest hemicellulose yield and lowest contamination from lignin, was using 10% (w/v) KOH concentration, 25 °C, and time of 3 h. The hemicellulose film exhibited better thermal stability and elongation at break than other polymeric films. It also exhibited lower rigidity and higher flexibility than other biodegradable polymers, including polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB).Entities:
Keywords: curaua fibers; experimental design; hemicellulose; thermal characterization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893963 PMCID: PMC9331607 DOI: 10.3390/polym14152999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
The 23 factorial design resulting in 16 experiments.
| Level | KOH Solution | Temperature (°C) | Time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| − | 10 | 25 | 3 |
| + | 20 | 50 | 5 |
Figure 1Hemicellulose films obtained by water casting.
Design matrix with hemicellulose yield and values of main effects with their interactions.
| Method | Concentration | Temperature (°C) | Time (h) | Yield (%) | Standard Deviation | Factors | Values Effects and Interactions | t 95% * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | ≈25 °C | 3 | 16.03 | ±0.03 | A | 1.50 | >0.24 |
| 2 | 20 | ≈25 °C | 3 | 18.11 | ±0.30 | C | 0.30 | >0.24 |
| 3 | 10 | 50 | 3 | 14.22 | ±0.14 | T | 0.02 | <0.24 |
| 4 | 20 | 50 | 3 | 15.31 | ±0.01 | t | 0.11 | <0.24 |
| 5 | 10 | ≈25 °C | 5 | 13.17 | ±0.04 | CT | −0.03 | <0.24 |
| 6 | 20 | ≈25 °C | 5 | 18.39 | ±0.22 | Ct | 0.16 | <0.24 |
| 7 | 10 | 50 | 5 | 15.97 | ±0.15 | Tt | 0.23 | <0.24 |
| 8 | 20 | 50 | 5 | 20.86 | ±0.02 | CTt | 0.02 | <0.24 |
A = average; C = concentration; T = temperature; t = time; CT = interaction between concentration and temperature factors; Ct = interaction between concentration and time factors; Tt = interaction between temperature and time factors; CTt = interaction between concentration, temperature, and time factors; * The value to the Student’s t distribution with eight degrees of freedom for 95% confidence (2.31) multiplied by error (0.11) establishes 0.24 as the minimum value for the effects to be considered statistically significant.
Figure 2(A) TG curves and (B) DTG curves of the hemicellulose samples obtained by each extraction method; (C) TG curves and (D) DTG curves for extracted fibers subjected to the two most extreme methods of experimental design.
Thermal degradation for hemicellulose extracted by the different methods.
| Method/Test Conditions | Thermal Stability (°C) | Hemicellulose | Cellulose | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak 1 (°C) | Peak 2 (°C) | Weight Loss at Peaks (%) | Peaks (°C) | Weight Loss (%) | Residue at 900 °C (%) | |||
| 1 | 10%_25 °C_3 h | 216 | 220 | 272 | 48 | 448 | 7 | 17 |
| 2 | 20%_25 °C_3 h | 222 | 226 | 269 | 43 | 459 | 11 | 10 |
| 3 | 10%_50 °C_3 h | 231 | 230 | 276 | 43 | 446 | 8 | 18 |
| 4 | 20%_50 °C_3 h | 233 | 229 | 274 | 46 | 455 | 10 | 11 |
| 5 | 10%_25 °C_5 h | 235 | 229 | 272 | 43 | 453 | 7 | 17 |
| 6 | 20%_25 °C_5 h | 234 | 220 | 273 | 41 | 457 | 9 | 15 |
| 7 | 10%_50 °C_5 h | 224 | 227 | 274 | 49 | 444 | 8 | 19 |
| 8 | 20%_50 °C_5 h | 220 | 225 | 272 | 42 | 455 | 11 | 10 |
Figure 3DSC curves of hemicellulose samples obtained by each method.
Figure 4FTIR spectrum of the degradation products obtained at 311°C for hemicellulose prepared by method 1 (10%_25 °C_3 h).
The absorbance of identified components in the higher intensity spectrum obtained for each sample of hemicellulose in its degradation range.
| Method | H2O | CH4 | CO2 | CO | C=O | H2O | C-O-C | CO2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10%_25 °C_3 h | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| 2 | 20%_25 °C_3 h | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.07 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| 3 | 10%_50 °C_3 h | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.08 |
| 4 | 20%_50 °C_3 h | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.08 |
| 5 | 10%_25 °C_5 h | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| 6 | 20%_25 °C_5 h | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| 7 | 10%_50 °C_5 h | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.10 | <0.01 | 0.04 |
| 8 | 20%_50 °C_5 h | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Figure 5(A) Scanning electron microscopy of hemicellulose film at 200× magnification, indicating inorganic particles; (B) with 1000× magnification, indicating probable potassium residues resulting from the extraction process.
Mechanical properties of hemicellulose film compared to PHB and PLA films.
| Properties | Hemicellulose Film | Polyhydroxybutyrate Film | Polylactic Acid Film |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa) | 2.22 ± 0.13 | 20.87 ± 0.85 A | 58.0 ± 2.8 C |
| Young′s Modulus (MPa) | 4.17 ± 0.36 | 801.30 ± 24.46 A | 2240 ± 0.04 C |
| Elongation Percentage, ɛ (%) | 14.9 ± 2.65 | 4.12 ± 0.41 A | 3.6 ± 0.2 C |
A (Marina P. Arrieta, López, Hernández, and Rayón, 2014) [50]; B (Giaquinto et al., 2017) [49]; C (Marina P. Arrieta et al., 2014) [2]; D (Jamshidian et al., 2012) [51].
Figure 6DMA curves of the hemicellulose film.