| Literature DB >> 35893898 |
Asma Bouazza1, Roland Favier2, Eric Fontaine2, Xavier Leverve2, Elhadj-Ahmed Koceir1.
Abstract
3,5-Diiodothyronine (3,5-T2) has been shown to exert pleiotropic beneficial effects. In this study we investigated whether 3,5-T2 prevent several energy metabolism disorders related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in gerbils diabetes-prone P. obesus. 157 male gerbils were randomly to Natural Diet (ND-controlled) or a HED (High-Energy Diet) divided in: HED- controlled, HED-3,5-T2 and HED- Placebo groups. 3,5-T2 has been tested at 25 µg dose and was administered under subcutaneous pellet implant during 10 weeks. Isolated hepatocytes were shortly incubated with 3,5-T2 at 10-6 M and 10-9 M dose in the presence energetic substrates. 3,5-T2 treatment reduce visceral adipose tissue, prevent the insulin resistance, attenuated hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and reversed liver steatosis in diabetes P. obesus. 3,5-T2 decreased gluconeogenesis, increased ketogenesis and enhanced respiration capacity. 3,5-T2 potentiates redox and phosphate potential both in cytosol and mitochondrial compartment. The use of 3,5-T2 as a natural therapeutic means to regulate cellular energy metabolism. We suggest that 3,5-T2 may help improve the deleterious course of obesity and T2DM, but cannot replace medical treatment.Entities:
Keywords: 3,5-Diiodothyronine (3,5-T2); Psammomys obesus; basal metabolic rate; gluconeogenesis; isolated hepatocytes; ketogenesis; obesity; oxygen consumption; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893898 PMCID: PMC9329750 DOI: 10.3390/nu14153044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Experimental protocol design in desert gerbils Psammomys obesus.
In vivo effects of 3,5-T2 on thyroid hormones plasma levels from experimental P. obesus.
| Parameters/Groups | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ND-controlled | HED-controlled | HED-3,5-T2-treated | HED-Placebo | |
| Body weight (g) | 81 ± 3 | 144 ± 10 *** | 108 ± 3 ***/¶¶¶ | 141 ± 7 *** |
| Thyroid weight (mg) | 11.5 ± 1.32 | 10.7 ± 2.69 ns | 10.3 ± 1.18 ns/ns | 10.1 ± 1.47 ns |
| Thyroid mass (% body wt) | 14.1 ± 0.44 | 7.43 ± 0.26 *** | 9.53 ± 0.39 ***/¶¶¶ | 7.16 ± 0.21 *** |
| TSH (µIU/mL) | 1.63 ± 0.52 | 1.37 ± 0.17 ns | 1.19 ± 0.49 ns/ns | 1.46 ± 0.81 ns |
| TT4 (ng/mL) | 29.4 ± 2.23 | 24.3 ± 4.11 ns | 23.9 ± 3.22 ns/ns | 23.7 ± 1.34 ns |
| FT4 (pg/mL) | 3.88 ± 0.11 | 3.75 ± 0.57 ns | 3.71 ± 0.66 ns/ns | 3.79 ± 0.45 ns |
| TT3 (ng/mL) | 0.661 ± 0.08 | 0.344 ± 0.07 *** | 0.362 ± 0.03 ***/ns | 0.377 ± 0.09 *** |
| FT3 (pg/mL) | 1.92 ± 0.08 | 1.77 ± 0.07 ** | 1.10 ± 0.09 ***/¶¶¶ | 1.83 ± 0.02 ** |
| 3,5-T2 (pg/mL) | 0.30 ± 0.09 | 0.24 ± 0.07 ns | 0.51 ± 0.05 ***/¶¶¶ | 0.27 ± 0.08 ns |
| FT3/FT4-ratio | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.47 ± 0.01 ns | 0.29 ± 0.03 ***/¶¶¶ | 0.48 ± 0.04 ns |
| FT3/3,5-T2-ratio | 6.41 ± 0.88 | 7.37 ± 0.11 ns | 2.15 ± 0.18 ***/¶¶¶ | 6.77 ± 0.25 ns |
| FT4/3,5-T2-ratio | 12.9 ± 1.22 | 15.6 ± 1.42 ** | 7.27 ± 1.32 ***/¶¶¶ | 14.1 ± 0.11 ** |
Groups: I (n = 32); II (n = 30); III (n = 65) and IV (n = 30). ND: Natural Diet; HED: High Energy Diet; TSH: Thyreostimulating hormone; TT4: total Thyroxine; TT3: total 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine; FT4: Free Thyroxine or 3,5,3′,5′-tetraiodothyronine; FT3: Free 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine; 3,5-T2: 3,5-diiodothyronine. Normal range are as follows: TSH = 0.25–4 µIU/mL; TT4 = 45–126 ng/mL; FT4 = 7–18 pg/mL; TT3 = 0.80–2.20 ng/mL; FT3 = 2.2–5.3 pg/mL; 3,5-T2: 1.5 ± 4.6 pg/mL; FT3/FT4-ratio = 1.42–3.05. Normal range of FT3/3,5-T2-ratio and FT4/3,5-T2-ratio were not defined. Plasma thyroid hormones were assayed in 16 h-fasted P. obesus. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group to HED placebo group. ¶¶¶ p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group to ND placebo group. ns: no significant.
In vivo effects of 3,5-T2 on resting energy expenditure and plasma metabolic biomarkers from experimental P. obesus.
| Parameters/Groups | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ND-controlled | HED-controlled | HED-3,5-T2-treated | HED-Placebo | |
| Body weight (g) | 81 ± 3 | 144 ± 10 *** | 108 ± 3 ***/¶¶¶ | 141 ± 7 *** |
| BMI (g/cm2) | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.01 *** | 0.32 ± 0.03 ns/¶¶¶ | 0.47 ± 0.02 *** |
| Caloric intake (Kcal/100g BW) | 43.5 ± 1.9 | 316 ± 11 *** | 534 ± 10 ***/¶¶¶ | 322 ± 17 *** |
| Respiratory quotient | 0.913 ± 0.09 | 0.975 ± 0.03 ns | 0.753 ± 0.05 ***/¶¶¶ | 0.944 ± 0.07 ns |
| BMR (mLO2/h/g BW) | 0.521 ± 0.02 | 0.643 ± 0.09 *** | 0.891 ± 0.05 ***/¶¶¶ | 0.675 ± 0.03 *** |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 3.21 ± 0.51 | 15.2 ± 1.04 *** | 3.88 ± 0.17 ns/¶¶¶ | 14.9 ± 1.82 *** |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 17.9 ± 0.65 | 68.2 ± 9.44 *** | 20.5 ± 3.85 ns/¶¶¶ | 65.3 ± 7.11 *** |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 130 ± 21 | 580 ± 47 *** | 110 ± 14 ***/¶¶¶ | 608 ± 85 *** |
| HOMA-IR | 2.57 ± 0.14 | 5.33 ± 0.23 *** | 2.68 ± 0.11 ns/¶¶¶ | 5.58 ± 0.44 *** |
| ALT (IU/L) | 26.3 ± 1.58 | 74.1 ± 2.35 *** | 23.9 ± 1.47 ns/¶¶¶ | 81.3 ± 1.71 *** |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.81 ± 0.07 | 4.09 ± 0.61 *** | 1.58 ± 0.01 ***/¶ | 3.07 ± 0.06 *** |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.48 ± 0.70 | 8.06 ± 1.22 *** | 2.81 ± 0.64 ***/¶¶¶ | 7.98 ± 1.15 *** |
| NEFA (μmol/L) | 291 ± 33 | 578 ± 41 *** | 898 ± 66 ***/¶¶¶ | 609 ± 23 *** |
| Ketone bodies (µmol/L) | 250 ± 16 | 303 ± 30 *** | 588 ± 57 ***/¶¶¶ | 278 ± 21 *** |
| Lactate (mM) | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 1.13 ± 0.25 *** | 0.73 ± 0.14 ***/¶¶¶ | 1.05 ± 0.03 *** |
Groups: I (n = 32); II (n = 30); III (n = 65) and IV (n = 30). ND: Natural Diet; HED: High Energy Diet; BW: body weight; BMR: basal metabolic rate. BMI: body mass index; HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin; HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; NEFA: non-esterified fatty acids. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus HED placebo group. ¶ p < 0.05; ¶¶¶ p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus ND placebo group. ns: no significant. Ketone bodies are représented by the somme of β- hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate.
In vivo effects of 3,5-T2 on body adipose tissue repartition and hepatic metabolic biomarkers from experimental P. obesus.
| Parameters/Groups | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ND-controlled | HED-controlled | HED-3,5-T2-treated | HED-Placebo | |
| Total visceral fat (mg/g BW) | 10.3 ± 3.38 | 25.8 ± 4.32 *** | 10.1 ± 1.85 ***/¶¶¶ | 26.3 ± 4.38 *** |
| Retroperitoneal fat (mg/g BW) | 2.75 ± 0.66 | 3.02 ± 0.57 ns | 2.11 ± 0.44 ns/ns | 2.98 ± 0.75 ns |
| Omental fat (mg/g BW) | 1.27 ± 0.91 | 9.95 ± 1.33 *** | 2.79 ± 0.68***/¶¶¶ | 10.1 ± 2.22 *** |
| Mesenteric fat (mg/g BW) | 6.33 ± 1.81 | 12.9 ± 2.42 *** | 5.18 ± 0.73 ***/¶¶¶ | 13.2 ± 1.41 *** |
| Epididymal fat (mg/g BW) | 3.14 ± 0.72 | 8.69 ± 1.47 *** | 2.25 ± 0.65 *** | 9.02 ± 0.73 *** |
| Subcutaneous fat (mg/g BW) | 1.93 ± 0.17 | 8.33 ± 1.18 *** | 2.09 ± 0.15 ***/¶¶¶ | 7.92 ± 0.22 *** |
| Perirenal fat (mg/g BW) | 2.13 ± 0.51 | 2.82 ± 1.61 ns | 2.03 ± 0.34 ns/ns | 2.57 ± 1.91 ns |
| Suprascapular fat (mg/g BW) | 5.91 ± 2.14 | 12.5 ± 1.08 ** | 4.11 ± 1.33 ***/¶¶¶ | 11.9 ± 2.01 ** |
| Gonadal fat (mg/g BW) | 1.78 ± 0.61 | 1.93 ± 0.22 ns | 1.66 ± 0.55 ns/ns | 1.86 ± 1.24 ns |
| Intramuscular fat (mg/g BW) | 2.51 ± 0.33 | 3.74 ± 0.27 ** | 1.81 ± 0.24 ***/¶¶¶ | 3.67 ± 0.45 ** |
| Adiposity index (% BW) | 2.61 ± 0.35 | 3.87 ± 0.95 *** | 1.07 ± 0.13 **/¶¶¶ | 3.91 ± 0.47 *** |
| Brown adipose tissue (mg/g BW) | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.07 * | 0.55 ± 0.05 */¶ | 0.31 ± 0.02 * |
| Total hepatic lipids (g 100 g wet/wt) | 2.97 ± 0.31 | 6.17 ± 0.94 *** | 3.19 ± 0.11 ***/¶¶¶ | 5.83 ± 0.76 *** |
| Hepatic glycogen (g/100 g wet/wt) | 2.77 ± 0.84 | 2.44 ± 0.93 * | 1.18 ± 0.02 ***/¶¶¶ | 2.65 ± 0.79 |
| Liver mass (% body BW) | 2.51 ± 0.45 | 4.05 ± 0.78 *** | 2.89 ± 0.33 ***/¶¶¶ | 3.64 ± 1.49 *** |
Groups: I (n = 32); II (n = 30); III (n = 65) and IV (n = 30). ND: Natural Diet; HED: High Energy Diet; BW: body weight. wt: weight. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus HED placebo group. ¶ p < 0.05; ¶¶¶ p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus ND placebo group. ns: no significant.
Figure 2Effects of 3,5-T2 on oxygen consumption in isolated hepatocytes from experimental P. obesus fed ND or HED. ND: Natural Diet, HED: High Energy Diet. Freshly isolated hepatocytes from 16 h-fasted P. obesus were incubated in Krebs/bicarbonate, buffer containing alanine or lactate (L) + pyruvate (P) together with octanoate (A,B) in the absence or presence of 3,5-T2 (10−9 or 10−6 M). The oxygen consumption rate was determined polarographically at 37 °C with a Clark electrode and expressed as natoms O2/min/mg protein. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus HED placebo group. ¶ p < 0.05; ¶¶¶ p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus ND placebo group. ns: no significant.
In vitro effects of 3,5-T2 on hepatic gluconeogenesis, glycolysis, ketogenesis and intracellular intermediary metabolites fluxes from experimental P. obesus.
| Metabolic Fluxes | Energy | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose synthesis | Ala+Octa | 4.33 ± 0.22 | 8.38 ± 0.54 | 2.55 ± 0.31 ***/¶¶¶ | 2.19 ± 0.11 ***/¶¶¶ | 4.22 ± 0.62 | 3.87 ± 0.22 |
| (L+P)+Octa | 5.66 ± 0.31 | 12.1 ± 0.27 | 4.87 ± 0.17 ***/¶ | 2.66 ± 0.33 ***/¶¶¶ | 5.33 ± 0.41 | 5.02 ± 0.77 | |
| Glycolysis | Ala+Octa | 1.83 ± 0.12 | 3.27 ± 0.14 | 1.65 ± 0.41 ***/¶¶¶ | 1.09 ± 0.53 ***/¶¶¶ | 2.02 ± 0.33 | 2.11 ± 0.12 |
| Ketogenesis | Ala+Octa | 4.77 ± 0.33 | 5.65 ± 0.61 | 5.87 ± 0.55 ***/¶¶ | 6.29 ± 0.11 ***/¶¶¶ | 4.08 ± 0.34 | 3.95 ± 0.61 |
| (L+P)+Octa | 3.76 ± 0.51 | 4.61 ± 0.37 | 4.97 ± 0.11 ***/¶ | 5.44 ± 0.13 ***/¶¶¶ | 3.05 ± 0.21 | 3.02 ± 0.17 | |
| G6P (nmol/g dry cells) | 184 ± 62 | 227 ± 51 | 108 ± 31 ***/¶¶¶ | 97 ± 14 ***/¶¶¶ | 172 ± 23 | 181 ± 55 | |
| F6P (nmol/g dry cells) | 299 ± 24 | 338 ± 55 | 317 ± 11 ***/¶¶¶ | 379 ± 19 ***/¶¶¶ | 304 ± 31 | 310 ± 22 | |
| 3PG (nmol/g dry cells) | 951 ± 16 | 1331 ± 77 | 1016 ± 33 ***/¶¶¶ | 1287 ± 46 ***/¶¶¶ | 997 ± 32 | 1008 ± 57 | |
| PEP (μmol/g dry cells) | 575 ± 30 | 805 ± 44 | 895 ± 41 ***/¶¶¶ | 1034 ± 27 ***/¶¶¶ | 609 ± 22 | 645 ± 18 | |
Groups: I (n = 32); II (n = 30); III (n = 65) and IV (n = 30). ND: Natural Diet; HED: High Energy Diet; Freshly isolated hepatocytes from 16 h-fasted P. obesus were incubated in Krebs/bicarbonate, buffer containing Alanine (Ala) or Lactate (L) + Pyruvate (P) together with Octanoate (Octa), in the absence or presence of 3,5-T2 (10−9 or 10−6 M). G6P: Glucose 6-phosphate, F6P: Fructose 6-phosphate, PEP: phosphoenolpyruvate, 3PG: 3-phosphoglycerate are procuded from L + P + Octa. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus HED placebo group. ¶ p < 0.05; ¶¶ p < 0.01; ¶¶¶ p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus ND placebo group. ns: no significant.
Figure 3Effects of 3,5-T2 on both cytosolic and mitochondrial redox potential (NADH/NAD+) in isolated hepatocytes from experimental P. obesus fed ND or HED. ND: Natural Diet, HED: High Energy Diet. Freshly isolated hepatocytes from 16 h-fasted P. obesus were incubated in Krebs/bicarbonate, buffer containing alanine or lactate (L) + pyruvate (P) together with octanoate in the absence or presence of 3,5-T2 (10−9 or 10−6 M). Cytosol redox potential is represented by the L/P ratio (A). Mitochondrial redox potential is represented by the β- hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate ratio (β-HB/AcAc) (B,C). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus HED placebo group. ¶ p < 0.05; ¶¶¶ p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus ND placebo group. ns: no significant.
Figure 4Effects of 3,5-T2 on both cytosolic and mitochondrial phosphate potential (ATP/ADP) in isolated hepatocytes from experimental P. obesus fed ND or HED. ND: Natural Diet, HED: High Energy Diet. Freshly isolated hepatocytes from 16 h-fasted P. obesus were incubated in Krebs/bicarbonate, buffer containing alanine or lactate (L) + pyruvate (P) together with octanoate in the absence or presence of 3,5-T2 (10−9 or 10−6 M). Cytosol (A,B) and mitochondrial (C,D) phosphate potential is represented by the ATP/ADP ratio. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus HED placebo group. ¶¶¶ p < 0.001 compared 3,5-T2-treated group versus ND placebo group. ns: no significant.