| Literature DB >> 35893875 |
Yi-Seon Jeon1,2, Seungyeong Yu1, Chaeyeon Kim1, Hyuk Joo Lee3, In-Young Yoon4,5, Tae Kim1.
Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in many developed countries, and several studies suggest that vitamin D plays an essential role in brain function. A recent study showed that vitamin D deficiency was closely associated with daytime sleepiness and shorter sleep time. The relationshipbetween vitamin D levels and calcium levels is well established, and calcium level regulates slow-wave sleep generation. It is conceivable that the sleep disturbance in vitamin D deficiency may be due to an altered calcium level. Nonetheless, calcium levels, sleep disturbances, and activity rhythms have not been investigated directly. Therefore, we hypothesized that calcium and vitamin D levels might be important in regulating sleep and activity rhythm, and we analyzed the correlation with calcium levels by actigraphy analysis. Interestingly, a negative correlation was found between calcium level and sleep latency, total sleep time, use of sleep medicine, and daytime dysfunction among shift workers. In contrast, non-shift workers showed a negative correlation between the calcium level and the circadian phase. These findings suggest that low serum calcium levels may disrupt sleep-wake control and rest-activity rhythm, even if they are within the normal range.Entities:
Keywords: actigraphy; calcium; non-shift worker; rest-activity rhythm; shift worker; sleep; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893875 PMCID: PMC9331058 DOI: 10.3390/nu14153021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow chart of study design.
Figure 2Flowchart of cosinor analysis process to collect actigraphy-based activity parameters. Raw actigraphy data were transformed as vector magnitude (VM) values, and rest–activity rhythm parameters were collected by cosinor analysis. This analysis was performed using R software.
Demographic characteristics of shift workers and non-shift workers.
| Characteristics | Shift Workers | Non-Shift Workers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, male, | 11 (7.3) | 18 (8.9) | 0.604 |
| Age, years | 32.86 ± 0.62 | 40.40 ± 0.88 | <0.001 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 21.12 ± 0.22 | 22.00 ± 0.20 | <0.001 |
| Marital status, married, | 36 (24.0) | 91 (44.8) | <0.001 |
| Education, college graduates, | 140 (93.3) | 153 (75.3) | <0.001 |
| Current smoking, | 9 (6.0) | 23 (11.3) | 0.017 |
| Drinking, | 94 (62.7) | 112 (55.2) | 0.158 |
| Coffee consumption, cups/day | 1.12 ± 0.07 | 1.23 ± 0.07 | 0.18 |
| Physical activity, | 90 (60.0) | 113 (55.7) | 0.415 |
| Medication use, | 29 (16.5) | 57 (23.0) | 0.058 |
| Medical comorbidities, | 20 (13.3) | 33 (16.3) | 0.447 |
Data are presented as numbers (percentage) or mean ± standard error of means (S.E.M). The independent t-test and chi-square test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
A comparison of collected parameters of shift and non-shift workers.
| Shift Workers | Non-Shift Workers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 13.45 ± 0.46 | 14.58 ± 0.59 | - |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.31 ± 0.03 | 9.38 ± 0.02 | * |
|
| |||
| SL, min | 5.83 ± 0.31 | 5.53 ± 0.30 | - |
| TST, min | 406.87 ± 3.61 | 385.73 ± 3.37 | *** |
| WASO, min | 70.94 ± 2.01 | 58.51 ± 1.59 | *** |
| SE, % | 84.08 ± 0.39 | 85.84 ± 0.33 | *** |
| TIB, min | 484.10 ± 7.56 | 441.17 ± 5.11 | - |
|
| |||
| Phase | 14.72 ± 0.49 | 12.08 ± 0.42 | *** |
| Fit | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | *** |
| Amplitude | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | *** |
| SD | 612.07 ± 24.56 | 759.03 ± 32.77 | - |
| Mean | 1054.62 ± 55.53 | 1042.83 ± 52.67 | - |
| Intercept | 714.62 ± 53.53 | 744.96 ± 33.23 | - |
|
| |||
| MEQ | 42.58 ± 0.61 | 47.78 ± 0.59 | *** |
| ESS | 9.19 ± 0.27 | 7.80 ± 0.22 | *** |
| HADS | 12.65 ± 0.49 | 11.42 ± 0.38 | * |
| PSQI | 7.91 ± 0.26 | 6.37 ± 0.20 | *** |
| FSS | 45.23 ± 1.18 | 36.05 ± 1.03 | *** |
| CD-RISC | 62.28 ± 1.06 | 63.06 ± 1.07 | - |
Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 denotes statistical significance by two-sample t-test. a Parameters for sleep based on actigraphy. b Parameters for rest–activity rhythm based on actigraphy. The italics indicate the category titles. c Clinical parameters were collected through self-report questionnaires. Abbreviations: SL, sleep latency (min); TST, total sleep time (min); WASO, wake after sleep onset (min); SE, sleep efficiency (TST/TIP * 100%); TIB, time in bed (min). Phase, the time of day of the peak of the curve; Fit, the value of the correlation with the fitted curve; Amplitude, the height of the rhythm; SD, standard deviation; Mean, the mean of the rhythm (=MESOR); Intercept, the activity intensity when the time is 0. MEQ, morningness-eveningness questionnaire; ESS, Epworth sleepiness scale; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index; FSS, fatigue severity scale; CD-RISC, Connor–Davidson resilience scale.
Figure 3Representative cosinor plots of shift and non-shift worker. Activity intensity means vector magnitude values of activity recorded by actigraph. ID indicates phase (acrophase), and the x-axis is responding time. (A) A double plot of averaged 24-h activity rhythm with the fitted curve of shift worker 002. (B) A double plot of averaged 24-h activity rhythm with the fitted curve of non-shift worker 012.
Figure 4Correlation plots of each parameter from shift and non-shift workers. (A) Correlation plot of shift workers (n = 150) and (B) correlation plot of non-shift workers (n = 203). Only a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05) is shown in these plots. The color and size of each circle reflect the value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient r (blue: positive and red: negative).
Figure 5There are significant correlations between Ca levels, sleep latency, and total sleep time in shift workers. (A) Ca levels showed a negative correlation with sleep latency in the shift workers. (B) Ca levels negatively correlated with total sleep time in the shift workers. Red lines represent trend lines by linear regression. Abbreviations: SL, sleep latency; TST, total sleep time; R, Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Figure 6Significant correlations between Ca levels and phase in non-shift workers. In daytime non-shift workers, there was no meaningful relationship between sleep parameters. (A) Ca levels negatively correlated with circadian phase in non-shift workers. (B) In order to confirm correlation, the significance is also checked in the subjects with the phase between 8 and 20. Red lines represent trend lines by linear regression. Abbreviations: SL, sleep latency; TST, total sleep time; R, Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Correlation between serum 25(OH)D levels and PSQI components.
| Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSQI Complex | Shift Workers | Non-Shift Workers | ||
| r | r | |||
| Component 1; subjective sleep quality | 0.140 | 0.088 | −0.024 | 0.737 |
| Component 2; sleep latency | −0.029 | 0.725 | 0.080 | 0.254 |
| Component 3; sleep duration | 0.132 | 0.108 | −0.037 | 0.596 |
| Component 4; habitual sleep efficiency | 0.066 | 0.421 | 0.053 | 0.450 |
| Component 5; sleep disturbance | 0.070 | 0.396 | −0.023 | 0.744 |
| Component 6; use of sleep medicine | −0.172 | 0.036 * | 0.081 | 0.248 |
| Component 7; daytime dysfunction | −0.200 | 0.014 * | 0.039 | 0.578 |
Data are presented as r and p-value. r, Pearson’s correlation coefficient. * p < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.
Correlation between serum calcium level and PSQI components.
| Serum Calcium Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSQI Complex | Shift Workers | Non-Shift Workers | ||
| r | r | |||
| Component 1; subjective sleep quality | 0.040 | 0.627 | 0.018 | 0.794 |
| Component 2; sleep latency | −0.041 | 0.619 | 0.016 | 0.824 |
| Component 3; sleep duration | 0.004 | 0.959 | −0.049 | 0.491 |
| Component 4; habitual sleep efficiency | −0.019 | 0.817 | 0.020 | 0.775 |
| Component 5; sleep disturbance | −0.017 | 0.834 | 0.020 | 0.780 |
| Component 6; use of sleep medicine | −0.171 | 0.036 * | 0.014 | 0.837 |
| Component 7; daytime dysfunction | −0.201 | 0.014 * | −0.010 | 0.888 |
Data are presented as r and p-value. r, Pearson’s correlation coefficient. * p < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.