| Literature DB >> 35893762 |
Rehana Khan1, Sajib K Saha2, Shaun Frost2, Yogesan Kanagasingam3, Rajiv Raman1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess various retinal vessel parameters of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients and their correlations with systemic factors in type 2 DM. A retrospective exploratory study in which 21 pairs of baseline and follow-up images of patients affected by DM were randomly chosen from the Sankara Nethralaya-Diabetic Retinopathy Study (SN DREAMS) I and II datasets. Patients' fundus was photographed, and the diagnosis was made based on Klein classification. Vessel thickness parameters were generated using a web-based retinal vascular analysis platform called VASP. The thickness changes between the baseline and follow-up images were computed and normalized with the actual thicknesses of baseline images. The majority of parameters showed 10~20% changes over time. Vessel width in zone C for the second vein was significantly reduced from baseline to follow-up, which showed positive correlations with systolic blood pressure and serum high-density lipoproteins. Fractal dimension for all vessels in zones B and C and fractal dimension for vein in zones A, B and C showed a minimal increase from baseline to follow-up, which had a linear relationship with diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, serum triglycerides (p < 0.05). Lacunarity for all vessels and veins in zones A, B and C showed a minimal decrease from baseline to follow-up which had a negative correlation with pulse pressure and positive correlation with serum triglycerides (p < 0.05). The vessel widths for the first and second arteries significantly increased from baseline to follow-up and had an association with high-density lipoproteins, glycated haemoglobin A1C, serum low-density lipoproteins and total serum cholesterol. The central reflex intensity ratio for the second artery was significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up, and positive correlations were noted with serum triglyceride, serum low-density lipoproteins and total serum cholesterol. The coefficients for branches in zones B and C artery and the junctional exponent deviation for the artery in zone A decreased from baseline to follow-up showed positive correlations with serum triglycerides, serum low-density lipoproteins and total serum cholesterol. Identifying early microvascular changes in diabetic patients will allow for earlier intervention, improve visual outcomes and prevent vision loss.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes mellitus type 2; diabetic retinopathy; microvascular changes; retinal vessels; vascular analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893762 PMCID: PMC9326718 DOI: 10.3390/vision6030045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vision (Basel) ISSN: 2411-5150
Figure 1An example registration by Saha et al.’s method [23]. (a) Baseline image; (b) follow-up image; (c) mosaic image after registration. Only a fundus area that was common to both of the images was used for the analysis (c).
Vessel parameters generated by VASP that are used in this study.
| Vessel Thickness Parameters | Description |
|---|---|
| equiAVRB | Vessel width ratio for zone B |
| equiWidth3BA | Width ratio of artery for zone B |
| equiWidth3BV | Width ratio of vein for zone B |
| equiAVRB2 | Width ratio for zone B (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiAVRB’) |
| equiWidth3BA2 | Width ratio of artery for zone B (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiWidth3BA’) |
| equiWidth3BV2 | Width ratio of vein for zone B (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiWidth3BV’) |
| equiAVRC | Width ratio for zone C |
| equiWidth3CA | Width ratio of artery for zone C |
| equiWidth3CV | Width ratio of vein for zone C |
| equiAVRC2 | Width ratio for zone C (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiAVRC’) |
| equiWidth3CA2 | Width ratio of artery for zone C (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiAVRC’) |
| equiWidth3CV2 | Width ratio of vein for zone C (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiWidth3CV’) |
| equiAVRD | Width ratio for zone D |
| equiWidth3DA | Width ratio of artery for zone D |
| equiWidth3DV | Width ratio of vein for zone D |
| equiAVRD2 | Width ratio for zone D (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiAVRD’) |
| equiWidth3DA2 | Width ratio of artery for zone D (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiWidth3DA’) |
| equiWidth3DV2 | Width ratio of vein for zone D (computed using a different algorithmic approach than ‘equiWidth3DV’) |
| SimTort | Simple tortuosity for all vessels in zones B and C |
| CurvTort | Curvature tortuosity for all vessels in zones B and C |
| ThickTort | Thick tortuosity for all vessels in zones B and C |
| SimTortA | Simple tortuosity for artery in zones B and C |
| CurvTortA | Curvature tortuosity for artery in zones B and C |
| ThickTortA | Thick tortuosity for artery in zones B and C |
| SimTortV | Simple tortuosity for vein in zones B and C |
| CurvTortV | Curvature tortuosity for vein in zones B and C |
| ThickTortV | Thick tortuosity for vein in zones B and C |
Figure 2Zones in the retinal photograph. The left figure shows an example optic disc centred image, and the right figure shows an example macular centred image. The right figure also shows vessels classified into arteries and veins. Arteries are shown in red and veins are shown blue.
Figure 3Example demonstration of the six major vessels (three arteries and three veins) used in computing VASP parameters. Vessels in different zones are represented in different colours for illustration purposes.
The basic characteristics of the subjects at baseline and at follow-up.
| Basic Characteristics | Base Line | Follow-Up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years (Mean ± SD) | 49.73 ± 4.76 | 53.73 ± 4.76 | 0.010 |
| Gender | |||
| Male, N (%) | 9 (60) | 9 (60) | - |
| Female, N (%) | 6 (40) | 6 (40) | |
| BCVA (Log MAR), (Mean ± SD) | 0.04 ± 0.21 | 0·04 ± 0.21 | - |
| Cataract | |||
| Present, N (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (6.66) | 0.235 |
| Absent, N (%) | 15 (100) | 14 (93.33) | |
| BMI (kg/m2), (Mean ± SD) | 27.37 ± 5.59 | 26.52 ± 5.29 | 0.616 |
| FBS (mg/dL), (Mean ± SD) | 140.07 ± 43.54 | 161.87 ± 57.33 | 0.173 |
| HbA1c (%), (Mean ± SD) | 6.96 ± 0.98 | 7.58 ± 0.99 | 0.052 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), (Mean ± SD) | 135.73 ± 14.20 | 126.00 ± 17.65 | 0.056 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), (Mean ± SD) | 88.00 ± 12.65 | 77.33 ± 9.61 | 0.004 |
| Serum Triglycerides (mg/dL), (Mean ± SD) | 120.13 ± 33.96 | 134.67 ± 43.88 | 0.237 |
| HDL (mg/dL), (Mean ± SD) | 34.00 ± 5.33 | 32.67 ± 8.40 | 0.544 |
| LDL (mg/dL), (Mean ± SD) | 122.71 ± 25.60 | 122.07 ± 27.95 | 0.939 |
| Serum total Cholesterol (mg/dL), (Mean ± SD) | 180.73 ± 27.30 | 193.80 ± 31.30 | 0.157 |
| Nephropathy | |||
| Present, N (%) | 2 (13.33) | 4 (26.66) | 0.286 |
| Absent, N (%) | 13 (86.66) | 11(73.33) | |
| Neuropathy | |||
| Present, N (%) | 0(0) | 4(26·66) | 0.012 |
| Absent, N (%) | 15(100) | 11(73.33) | |
| Smoking Status | |||
| Yes (%) | 1 (6.66) | 1 (6.66) | - |
| No (%) | 14 (93.33) | 14 (93.33) | |
| Alcohol Status | |||
| Yes (%) | 1 (6.66) | 1 (6.66) | - |
| No (%) | 14 (93.33) | 14 (93.33) |
BCVA: Best Corrected Visual Acuity; BMI: Body Mass Index; FBS: Fasting Blood sugar; HDL: High-density Lipoprotein; LDL: Low-density Lipoprotein; SD: Standard Deviation.
The differences in parameters at baseline and 4-year follow-up.
| Parameters | Base Line | Follow-Up |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Mean ± SD) | (Mean ± SD) | |||
| Disc Radius | 78.00 ± 8.42 | 77.87 ± 7.96 | 0.884 | |
| Disc Centre_row | 305.86 ± 50.47 | 305.00 ± 49.46 | 0.421 | |
| Disc Centre_col | 500.93 ± 430.76 | 500.20 ± 430.64 | 0.587 | |
| Fovea Centre_row | 365.20 ± 61.55 | 367.07 ± 55.29 | 0.707 | |
| Fovea Centre_col | 466.27 ± 73.84 | 481.47 ± 62.15 | 0.309 | |
| Disc Zone C_IOU | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.982 | |
| MCZone3_IOU | 0.81 ± 0.12 | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 0.699 | |
| Equi AVR_C | 0.85 ± 0.17 | 0.92 ± 0.21 | 0.05 | |
| equiWidth_3C_V | 146.81 ± 31.32 | 140.52 ± 25.65 | 0.037 | |
| equiAVR_C2 | 0.84 ± 0.16 | 0.92 ± 0.22 | 0.054 | |
| equiWidth_3C_V2 | 148.61 ± 32.48 | 142.04 ± 26.69 | 0.030 | |
| equiWidth_3D_V | 130.24 ± 31.74 | 117.63 ± 29.70 | 0.000 | |
| equiWidth_3D_V2 | 130.46 ± 31.94 | 118.16 ± 30.25 | 0.000 | |
| Width Gradient_Inf_A | 0.001 ± 0.01 | 0.003 ± 0.01 | 0.057 | |
| Width Gradient_A | 0.001 ± 0.01 | 0.005 ± 0.004 | 0.046 | |
| Fractal Dimension | Fractal Dim | 1.25 ± 0.07 | 1.28 ± 0.07 | 0.002 |
| Fractal Dim_V | 1.09 ± 0.10 | 1.12 ± 0.11 | 0.014 | |
| Curv Tort_A | 0.0003 ± 0.0001 | 0.0002 ± 0.0001 | 0.032 | |
| Thick Tort_V | 4.69 ± 17.24 | 0.01 ± 0.04 | 0.31 | |
| Lacunarity | Lac | 0.52 ± 0.14 | 0.51 ± 0.13 | 0.003 |
| Lac_ A | 0.61 ± 0.22 | 0.60 ± 0.25 | 0.028 | |
| Lac_ V | 0.58 ± 0.24 | 0.58 ± 0.15 | 0.015 | |
| Central Reflex | CR_Ratio_A1 | 0.36 ± 0.72 | 0.08 ± 0.57 | 0.033 |
| CR_InRatio_A1 | 0.08 ± 1.02 | 0.60 ± 0.83 | 0.014 | |
| CR_VesWidth_A1 | 46.05 ± 53.19 | 75.90 ± 43.71 | 0.052 | |
| CR_InRatio_A2 | 0.86 ± 0.55 | 0.19 ± 1.02 | 0.038 | |
| CR_VesWidth_A2 | 9.83 ± 29.14 | 27.64 ± 36.99 | 0.057 | |
| Branch Parameters | Num Br | 4.60 ± 1.96 | 5.47 ± 2.75 | 0.043 |
| Branch Coef_A | 1.41 ± 0.57 | 1.20 ± 0.53 | 0.035 | |
| JED_A | 0.31 ± 0.69 | 0.0005 ± 0.52 | 0.033 |