| Literature DB >> 35893690 |
Gao Chen1, Haoyue Li2, Mingzhao Hao3, Xiaolei Li2, Yizhi Dong2, Yue Zhang2, Xiping Liu2, Cheng Lu2, Jing Zhao2.
Abstract
Influenza A virus (IAV) requires the host cellular machinery for many aspects of its life cycle. Knowledge of these host cell requirements not only reveals molecular pathways exploited by the virus or triggered by the immune system but also provides further targets for antiviral drug development. To uncover critical pathways and potential targets of influenza infection, we assembled a large amount of data from 8 RNA sequencing studies of IAV infection for integrative network analysis. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to investigate modules and genes correlated with the time course of infection and/or multiplicity of infection (MOI). Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were performed to explore the biological functions and pathways of the genes in 5 significant modules. Top hub genes were identified using the cytoHubba plugin in the protein interaction network. The correlation between expression levels of 7 top hub genes and time course or MOI was displayed and validated, including BCL2L13, PLSCR1, ARID5A, LMO2, NDRG4, HAP1, and CARD10. Dysregulated expression of these genes potently impacted the development of IAV infection through modulating IAV-related biological processes and pathways. This study provides further insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms and potential targets in IAV infection.Entities:
Keywords: bioinformatics; hub gene; influenza A virus; protein interaction; weighted gene co-expression network analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893690 PMCID: PMC9332270 DOI: 10.3390/v14081625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.818
The main features of 8 selected datasets in this analysis.
| GEO Datasets | Size | Cell Type | Hours | MOI | Abbreviations of Experiment Design |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE165340 | 6 | A549 | 9 | 5 | AC9-5; AN9-5 |
| GSE97672 | 16 | MDM | 3; 6; 12; 18 | 2 | M3-2; M6-2; M12-2; M18-2 |
| GSE104168 | 18 | A549WT; A549KO | 24 | 0.5 | AW24-0.5; AK24-0.5 |
| GSE156152 | 6 | 293T | 6 | 1 | T6-1 |
| GSE163959 | 64 | Turbinate; Lung | 24 | 1 | TN24-1; TR24-1; LN24-1; LR24-1 |
| GSE193164 | 6 | HBEC | 48 | 0.01 | HB48-0.01 |
| GSE186908 | 162 | HAE | 4; 18 | 0.1 | A4-0.1; H4-0.1; A18-0.1; H18-0.1; AP18-0.1; HP18-0.1 |
| GSE89008 | 20 | HTBE | 3; 6; 12; 18; 24 | 5 | HT3-5; HT6-5; HT12-5; HT18-5; HT24-5 |
Figure 1Module detection and network heatmap plot construction using WGCNA in the training group. Each colored row represents a color-coded module that contains a group of highly connected genes. (A,B) Dendrogram obtained by hierarchical clustering of genes based on their topological overlap is shown at the top; (C) Dendrogram of module eigengenes obtained from WGCNA on the correlation; (D) Module eigengene adjacency heatmap (each colored row in x- or y-axis represents a color-coded module).
Figure 2Distribution of module eigengene change in each experiment design of training group. The red graduates with –log (p-value), which the maximum is limited to 2. X label: module eigengene and number of p < 0.05. Y label: cell type, time point, and MOI (Table 1).
Figure 3The relationships between module eigengenes and traits. The colors represent modules. (A) Correlation of module eigengenes with time course (height: coefficients × 100); (B) Correlation of module eigengenes with MOI (height: coefficients × 100); (C) Scatter plots of module eigengenes in the salmon module (for Time); (D) Scatter plots of module eigengenes in the greenyellow module; (E) Scatter plots of module eigengenes in the skyblue module; (F) Scatter plots of module eigengenes in the salmon module (for MOI); (G) Scatter plots of module eigengenes in the purple module; (H) Scatter plots of module eigengenes in the orange module.
Figure 4GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of module genes in the training group. The length of red bars displays –log10(p-value). (A) Salmon module: GO; (B) Salmon module: KEGG; (C) Purple module: GO; (D) Purple module: KEGG; (E) Skyblue module: GO; (F) Skyblue module: KEGG; (G) Orange module: GO; (H) Orange module: KEGG; (I) Greenyellow module: GO; (J) Greenyellow module: KEGG.
Figure 5The PPI networks of IAV-related modules. The clearly labeled node was the top hub gene. The red: positive coefficient; the green: negative coefficient. (A) Salmon module; (B) Greenyellow module; (C) Orange module; (D) Skyblue module; (E) Purple module.
Figure 6The relationships between top hub genes and traits. The coefficients were the above numbers and the p-values were the below numbers. (A) In the training group; (B) In the validation group.