| Literature DB >> 35893639 |
Gabriel Tan Hong Tzuan1, Fazida Hanim Hashim1,2, Thinal Raj1, Aqilah Baseri Huddin1, Mohd Shaiful Sajab2,3.
Abstract
The capacity of palm oil production is directly affected by the ripeness of the fresh fruit bunches (FFB) upon harvesting. Conventional harvesting standards rely on rigid harvesting scheduling as well as the number of fruitlets that have loosened from the bunch. Harvesting is usually done every 10 to 14 days, and an FFB is deemed ready to be harvested if there are around 5 to 10 empty sockets on the fruit bunch. Technology aided by imaging techniques relies heavily on the color of the fruit bunch, which is highly dependent on the surrounding light intensities. In this study, Raman spectroscopy is used for ripeness classification of oil palm fruits, based on the molecular assignments extracted from the Raman bands between 1240 cm-1 and 1360 cm-1. The Raman spectra of 52 oil palm fruit samples which contain the fingerprints of different organic compounds were collected. Signal processing was applied to perform baseline correction and to reduce background noises. Characteristic data of the organic compounds were extracted through deconvolution and curve fitting processes. Subsequently, a correlation study between organic compounds was developed and eight hidden Raman peaks including protein, beta carotene, carotene, lipid, guanine/cytosine, chlorophyll-a, and tryptophan were successfully located. Through ANOVA statistical analysis, a total of six peak intensities from proteins through Amide III (β-sheet), beta-carotene, carotene, lipid, guanine/cytosine, and carotene and one peak location from lipid were found to be significant. An automated oil palm fruit ripeness classification system deployed with artificial neural network (ANN) using the seven signification features showed an overall performance of 97.9% accuracy. An efficient and accurate ripeness classification model which uses seven significant Raman peak features from the correlation analysis between organic compounds was successfully developed.Entities:
Keywords: ANN; Raman spectrum; chemometrics; oil palm; ripeness
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893639 PMCID: PMC9331806 DOI: 10.3390/plants11151936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Fresh oil palm fruitlet samples: (a) Under-ripe fruitlets; (b) Ripe fruitlets; (c) Over-ripe fruitlets.
Figure 2Thin film preparation from the fruit exocarp (T: top, M: middle, B: bottom).
Figure 3Raman spectra after deconvolution and curve fitting between the range of 1240 cm−1 to 1360 cm−1, where 7 hidden peaks are revealed, labeled as P1-P7.
Figure 4Raman spectra of oil palm fruit in the range from 700 to 1360 cm−1.
Summary of Raman bands and their molecular assignments and vibrational modes from this study and previous works.
| Peak | This Study | Villar et al. 2005 [ | Heraud et al. 2007 [ | Jehlicka et al. 2014 [ | Trebolazabala et al. 2017 [ | Molecular Assignment | Vibrational Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak 1 | 744 | n/a | 744 | 757 | 742–744 | Chlorophyll-a |
|
| Peak 2 | 915 | n/a | 915 | 900–915 | 915 | Chlorophyll-a |
|
| Peak 3 | 986 | n/a | 988 | 986 | 982–985 | Chlorophyll-a |
|
| Peak 4 | 1325 | 1340 | 1325 | 1325 | 1325 | Chlorophyll-a |
|
Figure 5Trend sample A for Raman peak intensity value of chlorophyll-a in fresh oil palm fruit throughout ripening process.
Summary of Raman bands and their molecular assignments with intensity values for five oil palm fruit ripening classes for sample A without spectrum pre-processing.
| Peak | Band | Molecular | Chlorophyll-a Raman Peak Intensity Value (a.u) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unripe | Under Ripe | Ripe | Over Ripe | Rotten | |||
| Peak 1 | 744 | Chlorophyll-a [ | 76.37 | 36.06 | - | - | 78.73 |
| Peak 2 | 915 | Chlorophyll-a [ | 13.35 | - | - | - | - |
| Peak 3 | 985 | Chlorophyll-a [ | 2.00 | 172.70 | 692.75 | 623.58 | 253.20 |
| Peak 4 | 1325 | Chlorophyll-a [ | 164.65 | 204.40 | 39.33 | 122.13 | 18.69 |
Figure 6Trend sample B for Raman peak intensity value of chlorophyll-a and guanine-cytosine in fresh oil palm fruit throughout ripening process.
Summary of Raman bands and their molecular assignments with intensity values for three oil palm fruit ripening classes for sample B without spectrum pre-processing.
| Peak | Band | Molecular | Organic Compounds Raman Peak Intensity Value (a.u) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under Ripe | Ripe | Over Ripe | |||
| Peak 1 | 744–746 | Chlorophyll-a [ | 61.01 | 57.17 | 84.79 |
| Peak 2 | 915 | Chlorophyll-a [ | - | - | - |
| Peak 3 | 986 | Chlorophyll-a [ | - | - | - |
| Peak 4 | 1317–1318 | Guanine-Cytosine [ | 306.03 | 472.78 | 616.37 |
Summary of Raman bands and their molecular assignments with intensity values for four oil palm fruit ripening classes for sample A in the range of 1240 cm−1 to 1360 cm−1 after spectrum pre-processing and deconvolution.
| Peak | Band (Raman Peak cm−1) | Molecular Assignment | Organic Compounds Raman Peak Intensity Value (a.u) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unripe | Under Ripe | Ripe | Over Ripe | |||
| P1 | 1244 | Proteins through Amide III (β-sheet) | 172.79 | 205.08 | 385.40 | 665.57 |
| P2 | 1258 | Beta carotene [ | 118.42 | 127.57 | 184.36 | 424.79 |
| P3 | 1281 | Carotene [ | 185.73 | 413.50 | 778.01 | 1364.08 |
| P4 | 1306 | Lipid [ | 45.78 | 200.61 | 240.54 | 391.19 |
| P5 | 1318 | Guanine/cytosine [ | - | 13.43 | 43.44 | 232.21 |
| P6 | 1325 | Chlorophyll-a [ | 161.66 | 35.88 | 26.40 | - |
| P7 | 1335 | Tryptophan [ | 16.23 | - | - | - |
| P8 | 1357 | Carotene [ | 293.68318 | 361.46494 | 421.66796 | 597.97796 |
Summary of Raman bands and their molecular assignments with intensity values for three oil palm fruit ripening classes for sample B in the range of 1240 cm−1 to 1360 cm−1 after spectrum pre-processing and deconvolution.
| Peak | Band | Molecular Assignment | Organic Compounds Raman Peak Intensity Value (a.u) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under Ripe | Ripe | Over Ripe | |||
| P1 | 1244–1250 | Proteins through Amide III (β-sheet) | 343.00 | 701.73 | 894.58 |
| P2 | 1261–1266 | Beta carotene [ | 174.87 | 357.81 | 526.63 |
| P3 | 1280–1281 | Carotene [ | 685.53 | 1134.91 | 1354.20 |
| P4 | 1297–1305 | Lipid [ | 233.06 | 448.38 | 563.21 |
| P5 | 1317–1320 | Guanine-cytosine [ | 283.94 | 411.87 | 637.68 |
| P6 | 1325 | Chlorophyll-a [ | - | - | - |
| P7 | 1331–1335 | Tryptophan [ | 147.96 | 205.07 | 169.18 |
| P8 | 1351–1354 | Carotene [ | 333.58 | 568.25 | 749.752 |
Figure 7Trend of Raman peak intensity for the four ripeness classes in sample A.
Figure 8Trend of Raman peak intensity for the three ripeness classes in sample B.
Figure 9All Confusion Matrix generated from ANN model based on seven significant features.
Classification results from previous researchers and this study.
| Researcher | Overall Performance | Algorithm | Technique |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Shabdin et al. 2016) [ | 70% | ANN | HIS color model |
| (Bensaeed et al. 2014) [ | 98.67% | ANN | Hyperspectral |
| (May et al. 2011) [ | 88.74% | Fuzzy logic | RGB color model |
| (Sameen et al. 2015) [ | 67.10% | Genetic Algorithm | Image processing |
| (Astuti et al. 2019) [ | 65% | KNN | Sobel edge detection |
| (Raj et al. 2021) [ | 100% | KNN | Raman spectroscopy (1495 to 1535 cm−1 band) |
| This study (2022) | 97.9% | ANN | Raman spectroscopy (1240 to 1360 cm−1) |