| Literature DB >> 35893299 |
Yu-Jen Fang1,2, Arvind Mukundan3, Yu-Ming Tsao3,4, Chien-Wei Huang5,6, Hsiang-Chen Wang3.
Abstract
Early detection of esophageal cancer has always been difficult, thereby reducing the overall five-year survival rate of patients. In this study, semantic segmentation was used to predict and label esophageal cancer in its early stages. U-Net was used as the basic artificial neural network along with Resnet to extract feature maps that will classify and predict the location of esophageal cancer. A total of 75 white-light images (WLI) and 90 narrow-band images (NBI) were used. These images were classified into three categories: normal, dysplasia, and squamous cell carcinoma. After labeling, the data were divided into a training set, verification set, and test set. The training set was approved by the encoder-decoder model to train the prediction model. Research results show that the average time of 111 ms is used to predict each image in the test set, and the evaluation method is calculated in pixel units. Sensitivity is measured based on the severity of the cancer. In addition, NBI has higher accuracy of 84.724% when compared with the 82.377% accuracy rate of WLI, thereby making it a suitable method to detect esophageal cancer using the algorithm developed in this study.Entities:
Keywords: ResNet150V2; U-Net; encoder–decoder model; esophageal cancer; narrowband imaging; semantic segmentation; small data; white light imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893299 PMCID: PMC9331549 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Figure 1Overall experimental flow chart.
Figure 2(a,b) Input images after cropping the original WLI images; (c,d) input images after cropping the original NBI images. (e–h) Ground-truth maps marked by doctors based on the corresponding input images. (i–l) Prediction results of the corresponding graphs; the orange mark corresponds to SCC, whereas the purple mark corresponds to dysplasia.
Confusion matrix for narrow-band imaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Normal | 525,422 | 100,490 | 83.95% | 0.857922 | 67.89% | |
| Dysplasia and SCC | 73,537 | 439,809 | 85.67% | 0.834833 | 71.35% | |
| True Positive Rate | 87.72% | 81.40% | ||||
Confusion matrix for white-light imaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Normal | 504,168 | 82,798 | 85.89% | 0.852622 | 71.79% | |
| Dysplasia and SCC | 91,495 | 310,531 | 77.24% | 0.780861 | 54.48% | |
| True Positive Rate | 84.64% | 78.95% | ||||