| Literature DB >> 35892536 |
Yang Meng1, Boqi Zhang2, Zhiyun Qin1, Yang Chen1, Xuesong Shan1, Limin Sun1, Huaizhi Jiang1.
Abstract
Liaoning cashmere goat is a well-known local cashmere goat breed in China and even in the world. It is famous for producing cashmere with superior quality and high yield. Cashmere yield, body measurements, and body weight are the primary indicators of cashmere goat breeding, but the correlation between them is not yet clear. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between certain body measurements, body weight, and cashmere yield in Liaoning cashmere goats using stepwise and factor score analyses in a multiple regression analysis. For this purpose, the body measurements (body slanting length (BSL), body height (BH), chest circumference (CC), pipe circumference (PC), chest depth (CD), chest width (CW), hip breadth (HB), body weight (BW) and cashmere yield (CY)) of 200 (2-year-old) Liaoning cashmere goats were collected. Stepwise analysis of the results showed that body weight had the greatest direct effect on cashmere yield, followed by hip breadth, while chest circumference mainly affected cashmere yield indirectly. The results of factor score analysis showed that the independent variable can be represented by two factors, which explained 49.596% and 12.095% of the total variance, respectively. The factor scores used in the regression analysis explained 75.8% of the total variance in Liaoning cashmere yield. The above studies show that the growth traits of Liaoning cashmere goats are closely related to the cashmere yield. Growth traits should be considered important factors in breed selection, germplasm identification, and rearing.Entities:
Keywords: Liaoning cashmere goats; body weight measurements; cashmere yield; factor analysis; regression analysis; stepwise analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35892536 PMCID: PMC9331259 DOI: 10.3390/ani12151886
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Descriptive statistics of certain body measurements, body weight, and cashmere yield of Liaoning cashmere goats.
| Parameter | n | Mean | Standard Deviation (SD) | Coefficient of Variation (CV) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body slanting length (BSL) | 200 | 49.51 | 0.81 | 1.63 |
| Body height (BH) | 200 | 42.46 | 1.62 | 3.82 |
| Chest circumference (CC) | 200 | 79.88 | 1.33 | 1.67 |
| Pipe circumference (PC) | 200 | 4.25 | 0.08 | 1.94 |
| Chest depth (CD) | 200 | 19.12 | 0.99 | 5.17 |
| Chest width (CW) | 200 | 17.8 | 0.92 | 5.16 |
| Hip breadth (HB) | 200 | 11.74 | 0.79 | 6.76 |
| Body weight (BW) | 200 | 46.26 | 2.62 | 5.66 |
| Cashmere yield (CY) | 200 | 566.37 | 32.93 | 5.81 |
Pearson correlation analysis of body measurements between body weight and cashmere yield of Liaoning cashmere goats.
| Traits | CY | BSL | BH | CC | PC | CD | CW | HB | BW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CY (Y) | — | ||||||||
| BSL (X1) | 0.413 ** | — | |||||||
| BH (X2) | 0.326 ** | 0.148 * | — | ||||||
| CC (X3) | 0.633 ** | 0.488 ** | 0.338 ** | — | |||||
| PC (X4) | 0.512 ** | 0.352 ** | 0.219 ** | 0.658 ** | — | ||||
| CD (X5) | 0.427 ** | 0.340 ** | 0.041 | 0.454 ** | 0.491 ** | — | |||
| CW (X6) | 0.571 ** | 0.254 ** | 0.319 ** | 0.460 ** | 0.338 ** | 0.309 ** | — | ||
| HB (X7) | 0.681 ** | 0.299 ** | 0.343 ** | 0.581 ** | 0.486 ** | 0.326 ** | 0.628 ** | — | |
| BW (X8) | 0.734 ** | 0.339 ** | 0.173 * | 0.537 ** | 0.382 ** | 0.328 ** | 0.480 ** | 0.529 ** | — |
Note: ** indicates an extremely significant correlation (p < 0.01); * indicates a significant correlation (p < 0.05); no asterisk indicates no significant correlation (p > 0.05). There is no comparative significance between the same data, — used to fill the gap.
Path coefficient analysis between body measurements, body weight, and cashmere yield of Liaoning cashmere goats.
| Traits | Correlation Coefficient | Direct Impact | Indirect Effects | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum | BSL | BH | CC | PC | CD | CW | HB | BW | |||
| BSL (X1) | 0.413 | 0.071 | 0.343 | 0.013 | 0.036 | 0.023 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.074 | 0.147 | |
| BH (X2) | 0.326 | 0.088 | 0.239 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.025 | 0.085 | 0.075 | |
| CC (X3) | 0.633 | 0.074 | 0.559 | 0.035 | 0.03 | 0.042 | 0.039 | 0.036 | 0.144 | 0.233 | |
| PC (X4) | 0.512 | 0.064 | 0.449 | 0.025 | 0.019 | 0.049 | 0.043 | 0.027 | 0.121 | 0.165 | |
| CD (X5) | 0.427 | 0.087 | 0.34 | 0.024 | 0.004 | 0.034 | 0.031 | 0.024 | 0.081 | 0.142 | |
| CW (X6) | 0.571 | 0.079 | 0.493 | 0.018 | 0.028 | 0.034 | 0.022 | 0.027 | 0.156 | 0.208 | |
| HB (X7) | 0.681 | 0.248 | 0.432 | 0.021 | 0.03 | 0.043 | 0.031 | 0.028 | 0.05 | 0.229 | |
| BW (X8) | 0.734 | 0.433 | 0.301 | 0.024 | 0.015 | 0.04 | 0.024 | 0.029 | 0.038 | 0.131 | |
Multiple linear regression analysis results.
| Traits | Coefficients | Std. Error | T-Value |
| Tol | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Constant) | −386.562 | 104.548 | −3.697 | 0.000 | ||
| BSL | 2.899 | 1.862 | 1.557 | 0.121 | 0.738 | 1.355 |
| BH | 1.781 | 0.883 | 2.016 | 0.045 | 0.811 | 1.233 |
| CC | 1.830 | 1.571 | 1.165 | 0.246 | 0.379 | 2.637 |
| PC | 25.707 | 21.996 | 1.169 | 0.244 | 0.507 | 1.974 |
| CD | 2.889 | 1.578 | 1.831 | 0.069 | 0.684 | 1.462 |
| CW | 2.836 | 1.888 | 1.502 | 0.135 | 0.553 | 1.808 |
| HB | 10.290 | 2.402 | 4.284 | 0.000 | 0.458 | 2.184 |
| BW | 5.443 | 0.633 | 8.592 | 0.000 | 0.605 | 1.654 |
Note: R2 = 70.7%; R2 (adjusted) = 69.4%.
Factor analysis results.
| Factor Score Coefficients | Rotated Factor Loadings and Communalities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Factor1 | Factor2 | Factor1 | Factor2 | Communality |
| BSL | 0.561 | −0.357 | 0.654 | 0.124 | 0.443 |
| BH | 0.419 | 0.628 | −0.124 | 0.745 | 0.570 |
| CC | 0.833 | −0.113 | 0.684 | 0.488 | 0.706 |
| PC | 0.715 | −0.285 | 0.716 | 0.282 | 0.592 |
| CD | 0.585 | −0.535 | 0.793 | 0.010 | 0.629 |
| CW | 0.702 | 0.333 | 0.284 | 0.723 | 0.604 |
| HB | 0.796 | 0.257 | 0.404 | 0.732 | 0.699 |
| BW | 0.741 | 0.043 | 0.511 | 0.539 | 0.552 |
| Variance | 4.464 | 1.089 | 5.553 | ||
| Variance% | 49.596 | 12.095 | 61.691 | ||
Regression analysis results according to the factor analysis results.
| Traits | Coefficients | Std. Error | T-Value |
| Tol | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Constant) | 566.365 | 1.154 | 490.613 | <0.001 | ||
| Factor1 | 18.816 | 1.157 | 16.259 | <0.001 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Factor2 | 21.730 | 1.157 | 18.777 | <0.001 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Note: R2 = 75.8%; R2 (adjusted) = 75.6%.